| Date |
Text |
| 2018-03-29 16:57:04 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THESE PLANS ARE NOT BASED ON THE CURRENT 2014 |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE AND THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE |
| | STANDARDS THAT ARE REFERENCED BY THE 2014 FBC. PLEASE |
| | UPDATE THE PLANS TO THE 2014 FBC, THE 2014 FLORIDA FIRE |
| | PREVENTION CODE, AND THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND |
| | 101. THERE ARE STILL SOME CORRECTIONS THAT WERE MISSED. |
| | SEE SHEET 1 OF 10 AND SHEET A1.0. |
| | |
| | 2) REVISE THE CODE SECTIONS THAT ARE SPECIFIED ON THE |
| | PLANS TO CORRESPOND WITH THE APPROPRIATE SECTIONS IN |
| | THE 2014 FBC. ON SHEET 1 OF 10, SECTION 504 AND 504.1 |
| | OF THE 2014 FBC EXISTING BUILDING ARE THE SECTIONS FOR |
| | LEVEL 2 ALTERATIONS. |
| | |
| | 3) ON SHEET A3.0 THE ROOFING MATERIAL IS SPECIFIED AS |
| | ASPHALT TILE ROOF ON A 90# HOT MOPPED TO A 30# BASE |
| | SHEET. PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 WILL ASPHALT |
| | SHINGLES OR CONCRETE ROOF TILE BE INSTALLED? HOT MOPPED |
| | 90# IS NOT USED AS AN UNDERLAYMENT FOR ASPHALT |
| | SHINGLES. |
| | |
| | 4) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBERS THAT ARE SPECIFIED ON |
| | THE PLANS FOR THE WINDOWS IN THE SCHEDULE ON SHEET A4.0 |
| | AND THE TRUSS CONNECTORS ON SHEET S2.0 ARE EXPIRED. |
| | PLEASE UPDATE. |
| | |
| | 5) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY FAC |
| | 61G20-3.001 PER FLORIDA STATUTE 553.842 (5) THAT HAVE |
| | BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE DESIGNER |
| | OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH |
| | FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS |
| | AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT |
| | ROOFING MATERIALS, WINDOW/GLASS TYPES, STRUCTURAL |
| | MULLIONS, SKYLIGHTS AND EXTERIOR DOOR TYPES. |
| | |
| | 6) ON SHEET S1.0, UNDER GENERAL STRUCTURAL NOTES THE |
| | WINDSPEED IS INCORRECT AND THE EDITIONS OF ACI 318 AND |
| | ASCE 7 ARE INCORRECT. THE 2014 FBC REFERENCES ACI 318 - |
| | 11 AND ASCE 7 - 10. PLEASE CORRECT FBC-R CHAPTER 46. |
| | |
| | 10) THE WF12 MONOLITHIC FOUNDATION THAT IS SPECIFIED ON |
| | SHEET S1.0 FOR THE NEW ADDITION IS NOT ADEQUATE FOR THE |
| | EXTERIOR CBS WALL CONSTRUCTION. THERE IS ONLY ONE #5 |
| | CONTINUOUS RE-BAR SPECIFIED. THE FOOTER WILL HAVE TO BE |
| | A MINIMUM OF 16" THICK. FBC-R404.1.6 HEIGHT ABOVE |
| | FINISHED GRADE. CONCRETE AND MASONRY FOUNDATION WALLS |
| | SHALL EXTEND ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE ADJACENT TO THE |
| | FOUNDATION AT ALL POINTS A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES (102 MM) |
| | WHERE MASONRY VENEER IS USED AND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES |
| | (152 MM) ELSEWHERE. R403.1.4 MINIMUM DEPTH. ALL |
| | EXTERIOR FOOTINGS SHALL BE PLACED AT LEAST 12 INCHES |
| | (305 MM) BELOW THE UNDISTURBED GROUND SURFACE. THE |
| | EXTERIOR FOOTINGS THAT WILL SUPPORT THE NEW EXTERIOR |
| | CBS WALLS SHOULD BE LABELED DIFFERENTLY FROM THE 12" X |
| | 12" THICKENED EDGE THAT IS AGAINST THE EXISTING |
| | FOUNDATION WHERE THE DOWELS WILL BE INSTALLED. PROVIDE |
| | A SECTION FOR EACH OF THE DIFFERENT FOUNDATION TYPES. |
| | |
| | 11) THE VALUATION LISTED ON THE PERMIT APPLICATION OF |
| | $12,000.00 IS LOW. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ADEQUATE VALUATION |
| | BASED ON FBC 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR |
| | PERMITTING PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS |
| | SHALL BE TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, |
| | ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, |
| | RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, |
| | MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY |
| | LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST |
| | PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS |
| | SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY |
| | INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT |
| | VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 12) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
