| Date |
Text |
| 2017-07-27 09:40:00 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THIS SINGLE FAMILY DWELLING HAS A VALUE OF MORE THAN |
| | $300,000.00. SHOW HOW YOU WILL COMPLY WITH FBC EXISTING |
| | BUILDING SECTION 708.8. WHEN A ROOF COVERING ON AN |
| | EXISTING SITE-BUILT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE |
| | IS REMOVED AND REPLACED ON A BUILDING THAT IS LOCATED |
| | IN THE WIND-BORNE DEBRIS REGION AS DEFINED IN THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, BUILDING AND THAT HAS AN INSURED |
| | VALUE OF $300,000 OR MORE OR, IF THE BUILDING IS |
| | UNINSURED OR FOR WHICH DOCUMENTATION OF INSURED VALUE |
| | IS NOT PRESENTED, HAS A JUST VALUATION FOR THE |
| | STRUCTURE FOR PURPOSES OF AD VALOREM TAXATION OF |
| | $300,000 OR MORE: |
| | |
| | (A) ROOF TO WALL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE IMPROVED AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SECTION 708.8.1. |
| | |
| | (B) MANDATED RETROFITS OF THE ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTION |
| | SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED BEYOND A 15-PERCENT INCREASE IN |
| | THE COST OF REROOFING. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTION: SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES |
| | PERMITTED SUBJECT TO THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ARE NOT |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THIS SECTION. |
| | |
| | 708.8.1 ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS FOR SITE-BUILT |
| | SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. |
| | WHERE REQUIRED BY SECTION 708.8, THE INTERSECTION OF |
| | ROOF FRAMING WITH THE WALL BELOW SHALL PROVIDE |
| | SUFFICIENT RESISTANCE TO MEET THE UPLIFT LOADS |
| | SPECIFIED IN TABLE 708.8.1, EITHER BECAUSE OF EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS OR THROUGH RETROFIT MEASURES. AS AN |
| | ALTERNATIVE TO AN ENGINEERED DESIGN, THE PRESCRIPTIVE |
| | RETROFIT SOLUTIONS PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 708.8.1.1 |
| | THROUGH 708.8.1.7 SHALL BE ACCEPTED AS MEETING THE |
| | MANDATED ROOF-TO-WALL RETROFIT REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | EXCEPTIONS: |
| | |
| | 1. WHERE IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED (BY CODE ADOPTION DATE |
| | DOCUMENTATION AND PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE) THAT |
| | ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS AND/OR ROOF-TO-FOUNDATION |
| | CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH REQUIREMENTS WERE REQUIRED AT THE |
| | TIME OF ORIGINAL CONSTRUCTION. |
| | |
| | 2. ROOF-TO-WALL CONNECTIONS SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED |
| | UNLESS EVALUATION AND INSTALLATION OF CONNECTIONS AT |
| | GABLE ENDS OR ALL CORNERS CAN BE COMPLETED FOR 15 |
| | PERCENT OF THE COST OF ROOF REPLACEMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
