| Date |
Text |
| 2017-10-30 12:44:09 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION SECOND BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO. PROVISO |
| | MEANS THAT REQUIRED INFORMATION MAY BE SUBMITTED AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT BEFORE INSPECTIONS TO AVOID |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. REVISION FEES MAY APPLY. CONTRACTOR |
| | TO ADVICE IF THE PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS |
| | TIME OR IF RESUBMITTING REQUIRED INFORMATION BEFORE |
| | PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | NEED COUNTY IMPACT FEES STAMP ON PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| | RECEIPT BEFORE ISSUING THE PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT (2300 N. JOG RD.). |
| | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF |
| | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- REVISE ALL COMPONENTS AND CLADDING DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | ON SHEET S1 AND A2 TO REFLECT DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | EXPOSURE "C". SEC. R301.2.1.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | EXPOSURE WAS REVISED ON SHEET S1 BUT THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES SHOWN ON SHEET A2 FOR THE OVERHEAD GARAGE |
| | DOOR ARE NOT CLEAR. ACCORDING TO THE DESIGN DATA FOR |
| | WIND LOADS ON SHEET A2, THE DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ARE |
| | FOR THE 170 MPH ULTIMATE WIND SPEED. IT LOOKS LIKE THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE GIVEN BASE |
| | ON THE ULTIMATE WIND LOAD. BUT, THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR THE OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR ARE TOO LOW IF THEY ARE |
| | BASED ON THE 170 MPH ULTIMATE WIND SPEED WITH A "C" |
| | EXPOSURE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE DOOR LEADING |
| | FROM THE GARAGE TO THE MAIN HOUSE SHOWING COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF OPENING PROTECTION OF SEC. |
| | R302.5.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | NEED TO SPECIFY THE SELF CLOSING DEVICE AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. R302.5.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 4- ENGINEER OF RECORD IS DESIGNING AN UNVENTTED ATTIC. |
| | PROVIDE ICC EVALUATION REPORT (2 COPIES) FOR THE |
| | ICYNENE ROOF INSULATION SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD. NEED THE ICC EVALUATION REPORT TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R316 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- MASTER BATHROOM AND BATHROOM FOR OTHER BEDROOMS ARE |
| | SHOWING ONLY MECHANICAL VENTILATION FOR THE WATER |
| | CLOSET COMPARTMENT. NEED TO PROVIDE MECHANICAL |
| | VENTILATION FOR THE REST OF THE BATHROOM ALSO AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R303.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE INFORMATION ON MECHANICAL AND |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: MECHANICAL PLAN WAS REVISED, BUT ELECTRICAL |
| | PLAN WAS NOT. REVISE ELECTRICAL PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION |
| | AND SWITCH FOR THE EXHAUST FANS. |
| | |
| | 6- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | A) GARAGE OVERHEAD DOOR. DRAWINGS SUBMITTED ARE TOO |
| | LIGHT. THEY ARE NOT LEGIBLE. PROVIDE LEGIBLE DRAWINGS |
| | AND PROVIDE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE THAT |
| | CORRESPONDS TO DRAWINGS SUBMITTED. |
| | NOTE: PRODUCT APPROVAL WILL BE REVIEWED ONCE THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES ON ITEM #2 ABOVE ARE CLARIFIED. |
| | |
| | B) JAMES HARDI PLANK AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. PROVIDE |
| | COMPLETE INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROPOSED |
| | INSTALLATION THAT CORRESPOND TO FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL13192-R4 SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 8- PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE FOR THE |
| | BAHAMA SHUTTERS SHOWING PROPOSED INSTALLATION TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES AND NOA 14-1120.09 |
| | SUBMITTED. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE FOR THE |
| | COLONIAL SHUTTERS SHOWING PROPOSED INSTALLATION TO |
| | VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN PRESSURES AND NOA |
| | 14-1120.09 SUBMITTED. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 10- NO CLEAR WHAT KIND OF ROOFING IS GOING TO BE |
| | INSTALLED. METAL ROOF OR CONCRETE TILE. THERE ARE TWO |
| | DIFFERENT ROOFING PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. ONE IS |
| | FOR METAL ROOF AND THE OTHER ONE IS FOR CONCRETE TILE. |
| | PLANS CALL FOR METAL ROOFING. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO |
| | MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | NOTE: ROOF TILE REQUIRES REVISION ON THE DESIGN |
| | CRITERIA TO INCLUDE THE ADDITIONAL WEIGHT. |
| | |
| | ******ENGINEER TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING |
| | EACH COMMENT TO HELP EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***** PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWINGS. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
