| Date |
Text |
| 2017-11-22 10:33:15 | 3RD REVIEW. |
| | |
| | PREVIOUS PROVISO COMMENTS ARE RE-POSTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY PETER LEDUC, |
| | FIRE MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING AS PROVISO: |
| | |
| | THESE PROVISO COMMENTS WILL BE VERIFIED AND CONFIRMED |
| | AT THE TIME OF FIRE INSPECTION. FAILURE TO FOLLOW THESE |
| | PROVISO COMMENTS WILL RESULT IN A FAILED FIRE |
| | INSPECTION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) THE DOOR TO THE DRY STORAGE ROOM OPENS INTO THE PATH |
| | OF EGRESS. PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS, |
| | 7.2.1.4.3 - DOOR LEAF ENCROACHMENT |
| | 7.2.1.4.3.1 - DURING ITS SWING, ANY DOOR LEAF IN A |
| | MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL LEAVE NOT LESS THAN ONE-HALF OF |
| | THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A |
| | PASSAGEWAY, OR A LANDING UNOBSTRUCTED AND SHALL NOT |
| | PROJECT NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED WIDTH OF |
| | AN AISLE, A CORRIDOR, A PASSAGE WAY, OR A LANDING, WHEN |
| | FULLY OPEN, UNLESS BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS ARE |
| | MET: |
| | (1) THE DOOR OPENING PROVIDES ACCESS TO A STAIR IN AN |
| | EXISTING BUILDING. |
| | (2) THE DOOR OPENING MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS THAT LIMITS |
| | PROJECTION TO NOT MORE THAN 7 IN. INTO THE REQUIRED |
| | WIDTH OF THE STAIR LANDING WHEN THE DOOR LEAF IS FULLY |
| | OPEN. |
| | |
| | THOUGH THE STORAGE ROOM IS NOT CONSTANTLY OCCUPIED, AN |
| | AUTOMATIC DOOR CLOSER SHALL BE INSTALLED TO ENSURE THIS |
| | DOOR REMIANS CLOSED AT ALL TIMES AND WILL NOT BLOCK THE |
| | PATH OF TRAVEL TO THE EXIT DOOR. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ENSURE A DOOR CLOSER IS INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, |
| | CHAPTER 36, (NOT CHAPTER 10) |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) THE EXISTING HOOD AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEM SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH NFPA 96 AND HAVE A CURRENT SERVICE TAG. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
