| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-30 13:55:42 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. I |
| | AM IN RECEIPT OF AN EMAIL WHICH STATES: |
| | |
| | "I?M EMAILING YOU TODAY IN REGARDS TO THE CORRECTIONS |
| | SUBMITTED THIS MORNING. NOW THAT WE?VE DETERMINED |
| | PRESSURES BASED ON RAS 128, ARE WE GOOD TO GO? THE |
| | EXISTING MECHANICAL PERMIT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH OUR |
| | PROJECT, AND THE PREVIOUS ROOFING PERMIT IS BEING |
| | REPLACED BY OUR NEW ONE. WE ARE THE ONLY ROOFER ON THIS |
| | JOB." |
| | |
| | THIS IS IN CONFLICT WITH THE APPLICATION (WHICH HAS THE |
| | QUALIFIER'S NOTARIZED SIGNATURE), PERMIT DOCUMENTS, AND |
| | OUR DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | A LOCATION PLAN WAS REQUESTED AT THE COUNTER; I PRINTED |
| | AN AERIAL AND GAVE TO CJ TO FACILITATE THE LOCATION |
| | PLAN. |
| | |
| | IF THIS PERMIT IS UNRELATED TO THE MECHANICAL PERMIT, |
| | PROVIDE A SITE PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF THE MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT WORK, LOCATION OF THIS PROPOSED WORK. |
| | |
| | THE PREVIOUS ROOFING PERMIT IS RELATED TO THE |
| | MECHANICAL PERMIT. HOW CAN THIS PERMIT REPLACE THAT |
| | ROOFING PERMIT AND BE UNRELATED TO THE MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT? |
| | |
| | ADDRESS THE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. OPEN MECHANICAL PERMIT, 17050350 STATES THAT THE |
| | DESIGN CRITERIA IS FOR AN OPEN BUILDING, APPROXIMATELY |
| | 119' HIGH, 170MPH EXPOSURE C. |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THIS PROJECT IS APPROXIMATELY 20' HIGH, |
| | EITHER PARTIALLY ENCLOSED OR ENCLOSED. |
| | SEOR (JOE MINCUZZI, PE, ONM&J) DID NOT SPECIFY |
| | COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES. |
| | |
| | SEOR IS TO SPECIFY C&C PRESSURES FOR THIS PROJECT, FBC |
| | B 1609. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. ONE COPY OF STRUCTURAL |
| | CALCULATIONS FOR THE CURB WAS PROVIDED. PROVIDE TWO |
| | ORIGINALS. THIS CAN BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO THAT AN |
| | ORIGINAL IS MAILED TO ME, OR DIGITALLY SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED AND SENT VIA EMAIL, UPON REQUEST BY THE |
| | ENGINEER. (CONTRACTOR CANNOT COMMIT ON BEHALF OF THE |
| | ENGINEER) |
| | |
| | 2. THE VALUE OF PERMIT 17050350 APPEARS TOO LOW TO |
| | INCLUDE THIS PERMIT; PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR |
| | THIS JOB. |
| | |
| | 3. SEOR IS TO REVIEW THE ROOFING SUBMITTAL PRIOR TO |
| | SUBMITTAL TO THE CITY, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 4. PROVIDE A LETTER FROM MECHANICAL CONTRACTOR (WHO IS |
| | ACTING AS PRIME CONTRACTOR ON THIS JOB) REQUESTING THAT |
| | THE OTHER OPEN ROOFING PERMIT (17051222) BE REVOKED, |
| | FBC 107. THIS MAY BE SENT DIRECTLY TO ME VIA EMAIL. THE |
| | LETTER IS TO BE ON LETTERHEAD, SIGNED BY THE QUALIFIER. |
| | |
| | 5. A BUILDING PERMIT OR A REVISION IS REQUIRED. THE |
| | PLAN SPECIFIES STRUCTURAL WORK INCLUDING STRUCTURAL |
| | REPAIR; THIS IS NOT WITHIN THE SCOPE OF A MECHANICAL OR |
| | A ROOFING CONTRACTOR LICENSE. THE REQUESTED ROOF WORK |
| | CANNOT BE DONE UNTIL THE STRUCTURAL WORK IS INSPECTED. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, SCOPE IS NOT CLEAR. APPLICATION AND ALL |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED INDICATES THAT THIS ROOF PERMIT IS |
| | RELATED TO MECHANICAL PERMIT. EMAIL STATES OTHERWISE. |
| | IF THIS PERMIT IS UNRELATED, PROVIDE A NEW APPLICATION |
| | AND LOCATION PLAN AS REQUESTED. IF THIS PERMIT IS |
| | RELATED TO THE MECHANICAL PERMIT, THIS PERMIT WILL NOT |
| | BE ISSUED UNTIL A BUILDING SUB PERMIT IS OBTAINED. |
| | |
| | 6. TO RESOLVE, APPLICANT HAS THREE OPTIONS: |
| | |
| | ADDRESS THE COMMENTS AND RESUBMIT. PLEASE CALL ME AFTER |
| | THE PACKAGE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND I WILL TRY TO DO THE |
| | REVIEW WHILE YOU ARE HERE, ALTHOUGH THIS IS NOT THE WAY |
| | WE DO REVIEWS. COMMERCIAL RE-ROOFS HAVE A THREE |
| | BUSINESS DAY TARGET TURNAROUND TIME, RESIDENTIAL |
| | REROOFS HAVE A ONE BUSINESS DAY TARGET. YOUR |
| | APPLICATION IS RELATED TO AN EXISTING ALTERATION PERMIT |
| | (NOT CONSIDERED A REROOF), SO TARGET IS A WEEK. MY |
| | ATTEMPT TO ASSIST YOU AT THE COUNTER THAT DAY AND ISSUE |
| | A TURNAROUND PERMIT WAS UNUSUAL - WE CANNOT DO THIS FOR |
| | EVERY PERMIT. |
| | |
| | OR, |
| | |
| | CLARIFY SCOPE VIA EMAIL (ALL DOCUMENTS ARE FOR A CURB |
| | AND REROOF RELATED TO MECHANICAL PERMIT 17050350). IF |
| | THIS IS A ROOF SUB TO MECHANICAL PERMIT 17050350, I CAN |
| | PASS THE REVIEW WITH PROVISO: ENGINEER'S LETTER |
| | APPROVING REDUCED DESIGN CRITERIA SPECIFIED BY ROOFING |
| | CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, BUILDING SUB |
| | PERMIT TO BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ROOFING SUB |
| | PERMIT. |
| | |
| | OR, |
| | |
| | SUBMIT A REVISION TO THE MASTER PERMIT TO CHANGE SCOPE |
| | TO INCLUDE A REROOF, CHANGE OF CONTRACTOR FORM FOR THE |
| | ROOF PERMIT, OBTAIN A BUILDING SUB PERMIT. |
| | |
| | IF THIS IS UNRELATED TO THE OPEN MECHANICAL PERMIT: |
| | |
| | PROVIDE A ROOF PLAN SHOWING LOCATION OF THAT WORK, |
| | LOCATION OF YOUR WORK |
| | PROVIDE AN APPLICATION WITHOUT REFERENCES TO THE |
| | MECHANICAL PERMIT |
| | PROVIDE DOCUMENTS WITHOUT REFERENCES TO THE MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT |
| | A CURB IS PROPOSED; PROVIDE A MECHANICAL PERMIT FOR THE |
| | MECHANICAL WORK |
| | |
| | SCOPE IS NOT CLEAR AS THE TELEPHONE MESSAGE, MY |
| | CONVERSATIONS WITH APPLICANT, PERMIT DOCUMENTS, AND |
| | EMAIL HAVE CONFLICTING INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
