| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-21 15:23:33 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET LS 1.1 - ONLY ONE MEANS OF EGRESS IS INDICATED |
| | OF THE SUBMITTED DRAWING. ONLY 1 EXIT IS INDICATED IN |
| | THE LIFE SAFETY CALCULATION BOX. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 39 EXISITNG BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES |
| | AND CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS, TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED |
| | FROM THE PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | 39.2.4 NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | 39.2.4.1 MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL OF THE |
| | FOLLOWING, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE PERMITTED BY 39.2.4.2 |
| | THROUGH 39.2.4.6: |
| | (1) THE NUMBER OF MEANS OF EGRESS SHALL BE IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 7.4.1.1 AND 7.4.1.3 THROUGH 7.4.1.6. |
| | (2) NOT LESS THAN TWO SEPARATE EXITS SHALL BE PROVIDED |
| | ON EVERY STORY. |
| | (3) NOT LESS THAN TWO SEPARATE EXITS SHALL BE |
| | ACCESSIBLE FROM EVERY PART OF EVERY STORY. |
| | |
| | 39.2.4.6 A SINGLE EXIT SHALL BE PERMITTED FOR A |
| | SINGLE-TENANT SPACE OR BUILDING TWO OR FEWER STORIES IN |
| | HEIGHT, PROVIDED THAT BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA |
| | ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE BUILDING IS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN |
| | APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH 9.7.1.1(1). |
| | (2) THE TOTAL TRAVEL TO THE OUTSIDE DOES NOT EXCEED 100 |
| | FT (30 M). |
| | |
| | 39.2.5 ARRANGEMENT OF MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | 39.2.5.3* LIMITATIONS ON COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH 39.2.5.3.1, 39.2.5.3.2, AND |
| | 39.2.5.3.3. |
| | 39.2.5.3.1 COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL NOT EXCEED 100 |
| | FT (30 M) ON A STORY PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN |
| | APPROVED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | 9.7.1.1(1). |
| | 39.2.5.3.2 COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL NOT BE LIMITED |
| | IN A SINGLETENANT SPACE WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD NOT |
| | EXCEEDING 30 PEOPLE. |
| | 39.2.5.3.3 IN BUILDINGS OTHER THAN THOSE COMPLYING WITH |
| | 39.2.5.3.1 OR 39.2.5.3.2, COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL |
| | NOT EXCEED 75 FT (23 M). |
| | |
| | YOUR PROPOSED OCCUPNACY REQUIRES TWO MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND CORRECT, OR JUSTIFY YOUR POSITION |
| | WITH SPECIFIC CODE REFERNCES AND NARRATIVE EXPLANATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET A 1.1 - THERE ARE TWO DOORS WITH EXIT SIGNS |
| | OVER THEM. THE DOOR SCHEDULE AND NOTE INDICATE THE |
| | HARDWARE IS GROUPD B, PASSAGE. HOWEVER, THE HANDLE OR |
| | LATCH IS NOT INDICATED AS BEING COMPLIANT WITH NFPA |
| | 101, CHAPTER 7. |
| | |
| | 39.2.2 MEANS OF EGRESS COMPONENTS. |
| | 39.2.2.1 COMPONENTS PERMITTED. MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | COMPONENTS SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE TYPES DESCRIBED IN |
| | 39.2.2.2 THROUGH 39.2.2.12. |
| | 39.2.2.2 DOORS. |
| | |
| | 39.2.2.2.2* LOCKS COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.5.5 SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED ONLY ON PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE/EXIT DOORS. |
| | |
| | 7.2.1.5.10* A LATCH OR OTHER FASTENING DEVICE ON A DOOR |
| | LEAF SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A RELEASING DEVICE THAT HAS |
| | AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF OPERATION AND THAT IS READILY |
| | OPERATED UNDER ALL LIGHTING CONDITIONS. |
| | 7.2.1.5.10.1 THE RELEASING MECHANISM FOR ANY LATCH |
| | SHALL BE LOCATED AS FOLLOWS: |
| | (1) NOT LESS THAN 34 IN. (865 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED |
| | FLOOR FOR OTHER THAN EXISTING INSTALLATIONS |
| | (2) NOT MORE THAN 48 IN. (1220 MM) ABOVE THE FINISHED |
| | FLOOR 7.2.1.5.10.2 THE RELEASING MECHANISM SHALL OPEN |
| | THE DOOR LEAF WITH NOT MORE THAN ONE RELEASING |
| | OPERATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN 7.2.1.5.10.3, |
| | 7.2.1.5.10.4, OR 7.2.1.5.10.6. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, ENSURE COMPLIANCE AND PROVIDE AN |
| | APPLICABLE NOTE OF HARDWARE SPEC SHEET AND/OR PICTURE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
