| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-28 11:08:03 | ***CORRECTION**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1. REPEAT COMMENT - FBC B 1008, PANIC DEVICE REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE DOORS (ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY WITH OCC LOAD OVER |
| | 50). AS DISCUSSED AND NOTED IN PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEWS, |
| | THE STOREFRONT AND DOORS ARE A SIGNIFICANT PORTION OF |
| | THE PROPOSED WORK AND NON COMPLIANT INFORMATION HAS |
| | BEEN SUBMITTED IN EACH OF THE FIVE REVIEWS. FOR THIS |
| | REASON, THIS INFORMATION IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE AND WILL NOT BE A PROVISO ITEM AS IS OUR |
| | GENERAL PRACTICE. |
| | |
| | THE DOOR PRODUCT APPROVAL SUBMITTED IS FOR A NON IMPACT |
| | DOOR AND DOES NOT INCLUDE A PANIC DEVICE. |
| | |
| | IMPACT PROTECTION IS REQUIRED PER FBC B 1609.1.2. |
| | |
| | A SHUTTER IS NOT PERMITTED AT THE DOORS PER FBC B |
| | 1003.6. SHUTTERS ARE PERMITTED AT EXITS WHEN THEY FALL |
| | UNDER THE EXEMPTION FBC B 1008.1.4, BUT THIS EXEMPTION |
| | DOES NOT INCLUDE ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY. USE OF NON IMPACT |
| | DOORS WOULD REQUIRE APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL; |
| | APPLICANT MUST PROVIDE RATIONALE IN A SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | LETTER. |
| | |
| | USE OF REMOVABLE SHUTTERS IN A COMMERCIAL BUILDING |
| | REQUIRES APPROVAL BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHETHER FIXED OR REMOVABLE IMPACT PROTECTION IS |
| | PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | NO THRESHOLD INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED; ADA THRESHOLD |
| | REQUIRED ON BOTH DOORS; IS THIS WHAT IS PROPOSED? |
| | |
| | YOU MAY SEND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION VIA EMAIL AND A |
| | COURTESY REVIEW WILL BE PERFORMED. |
| | |
| | 2. BUILDING TYPE NOT CLEAR; IIB IS STATED IN SOME |
| | LOCATIONS, IIIB IN ANOTHER, CLARIFY. THIS WILL BE |
| | REDLINED UPON REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 3. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO: |
| | |
| | THE EXISTING DOOR IS SHOWN AS PERMANENTLY LOCKED. SEE |
| | FBC B 1008.1.9, |
| | |
| | THIS WILL BE SUBJECT TO THE FIELD INSPECTOR'S APPROVAL. |
| | IF THE DOOR LOOKS LIKE A DOOR, REMOVAL OF THE HARDWARE |
| | WILL NOT BE ADEQUATE TO RESOLVE THE COMMENT. IF |
| | APPLICANT IS ABLE TO MODIFY THE DOOR IN SUCH A WAY THAT |
| | IT IS CLEARLY NOT A DOOR, THAT IS ACCEPTABLE. A |
| | REVISION SHOWING MODIFICATIONS IMPLEMENTED MAY BE |
| | REQUIRED, SUBJECT TO FIELD INSPECTOR'S DISCRETION. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
