Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 17060359
Permit Number 17060359
Review Stop M
Sequence Number 3
Notes
Date Text
2018-01-10 14:44:173RD REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL, ENERGY CONSERVATION
 CODES.
 PERMIT #17060359
 1/10/18
  
 PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED.
  
 1) SHEET M1: RECIRCULATION OF AIR FROM THE KITCHEN AC
 SYSTEM (RTU-1) INTO THE BAR AREA IS PROHIBITED PER
 TABLE 403.3 FOOTNOTE B.
  
 2) M1: THE REQUESTED EXHAUST VENTILATION CALULATION AND
 EXHAUST SYSTEM FOR THE KITCHEN WERE NOT PROVIDED.
  
 3) M1: THE PLAN SHOWS INADEQUATE AMOUNTS OF OUTDOOR AIR
 TO BE PROVIDED TO THE DINING ROOM AND BAR AREA. USING
 TABLE 403.3 I AM CALCULATING 1118 CFMS OF O/A REQUIRED
 FOR THE DINING ROOM AND BAR: 70 PERSONS PER 1000 SQ.
 FT.= 111 PERSONS FOR 1584 SQ. FT. X 7.5 CFMS PER SQ.
 FT= (833 CFMS) + 0.18 CFMS X 1584 SQ. FT.= (285 CFMS)-
 (TOTAL 1118 CFMS REQUIRED).
  
 4) M1: DS DETECTORS SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE RETURN AIR
 SYSTEMS OF THE AIR HANDLERS- SECTION 606.2.1. THE PLAN
 SHOWS THE DETECTORS IN THE SUPPLY DUCTS.
  
 5) M1: AUTOMATICALLY CONTROLLED SHUTOFF DAMPERS ARE
 REQUIRED FOR THE O/A DUCTS SUPPLYING THE AC SYSTEMS-
 SECTION C403.2.4.4 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. THE PLAN
 IS INCORRECTLY SPECIFYING MANUAL DAMPERS- PLEASE
 CORRECT.
  
 6) M1: THE REQUESTED AIR BALANCE CALCULATIONS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED.
  
 7) M2: PLEASE PROVIDE THE BTUH CAPACITIES OF ALL THE
 GAS-FIRED COOKING APPLIANCES IN THE EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE,
 AND CIRCLE, HIGHLIGHT THE MODEL NUMBERS AND BTUH
 CAPACITIES ON THE PRODUCT SUBMITTALS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 THE SUBMITTED COMBUSTION AIR CALCULATIONS APPEAR TO BE
 BASED ON 166,000 BTU'S WHICH IS AN INCORRECT, VERY LOW
 AMOUNT WHEN COMPARED WITH THE CAPACITIES
  
 LISTED ON THE SUBMITTALS, AND SHOWN IN THE ISOMETRIC
 DRAWING- PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 8) PROVIDE AC CALCULATIONS FOR THE NEW 5-TON RTU
 SYSTEM- SECTION C403.2.1 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION.
  
 9) M1, DETAIL M/6: REFER TO TABLE 1509.6.5 FBC-BUILDING
 AND PROVIDE THE CLEARANCE DISTANCE HEIGHT FROM THE
 FINISHED ROOF SURFACE TO THE BOTTOM SIDE OF THE RTU.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE RTU IS BEING IDENTIFIED AS
 A"CONDENSING " UNIT INSTEAD OF "PACKAGE" UNIT IN THE
 DETAIL. IT APPEARS THIS DETAIL DOES NOT ACTUALLY DEPICT
 WHAT TH3E ACTUAL INSTALLATION WILL BE BECAUSE NO
 DUCTWORK IS
  
 SHOWN CONNECTING TO THE UNIT.
  
 10) M1, DETAIL M/6: THE ATTACHMENT DETAIL IS
 INCOMPLETE. MISSING DETAILS INCLUDE: A) NUMBER OF
 ANCHORING STRAPS AND HOW THEY ARE ATTACHED TO THE BEAM.
 B) ATTACHMENT OF THE CABLES TO THE BEAM. C) ENGINEERING
 FOR THE STAND, AND ATTACHMENT OF THE STAND TO THE
 STRUCTURE. D) WIND DESIGN CRITERIA: WIND SPEED,
 EXPOSUIRE CATEGORY, IMPORTANCE FACTOR, HEIGHT ABOVE
 GRADE, ETC.
  
  
 WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE
 LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY
 RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT
 CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE
 PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND
 KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS.
  
 CHRISTOPHER L. COLE
 MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401
 561-805-6719
 [email protected]
  
  
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved