| Date |
Text |
| 2017-09-14 09:00:01 | ****HOLDS HAVE BEEN PLACED ON UNITS 26, 27, 28 - NO |
| | PERMITS OR BUSINESS TAX TO BE ISSUED UNTIL THE EXITING |
| | ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED - PERMIT AND BUSINESS TAX |
| | RECEIPT APPLICATIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED BUT WILL NOT BE |
| | ISSUED UNTIL THE EXITING ISSUE IS RESOLVED, SEE COMMENT |
| | #3**** |
| | |
| | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1-2. OK |
| | |
| | 3. COMMENT FROM PREVIOUS LIST: THIS RESTAURANT AREA |
| | PREVIOUSLY OCCUPIED UNITS 26, 27, AND 28 (WALL |
| | SEPARATING UNITS 27 AND 28 REMOVED WITH PERMIT |
| | 12060109, COMBINED UNITS 26-28 RENOVATED INTO ONE |
| | RESTAURANT). UNIT 28 THEN PROVIDED THE REQUIRED SECOND |
| | EXIT. |
| | |
| | PERMIT #17010091, PLAN PREPARED BY MARK S. BEATTY |
| | AR92184 WAS SUBMITTED AND ISSUED TO SEPARATE UNIT 28 |
| | FROM UNITS 26/27. THE PLAN DID NOT SHOW EXISTING |
| | OCCUPANCY OR ROOM DESIGNATIONS. THIS PERMIT CREATED A |
| | LIFE SAFETY ISSUE WHICH MUST BE CORRECTED BEFORE UNITS |
| | 26/27 CAN BE OCCUPIED. |
| | |
| | THE DINING AREA, WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 151, HAS BEEN |
| | DESIGNED TO HAVE ONLY ONE COMPLIANT EXIT, TWO REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | PAPA RECORDS SHOW YEAR BUILT AS 1987. STANDARD BUILDING |
| | CODE 1982 (ALSO SBC1985, SBC1988) REQUIREMENTS WERE |
| | SIMILAR TO CURRENT CODE - TWO EXITS REQUIRED, EXITING |
| | THROUGH KITCHENS PROHIBITED. |
| | |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY PERMIT 17010091 DID NOT DISCLOSE |
| | THAT INSTALLATION OF A WALL CREATED AN EXITING ISSUE, |
| | AND WHY PERMIT APPLICATION 17060359 DID NOT CORRECT THE |
| | LIFE SAFETY VIOLATION. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NO RESPONSE LETTER WAS PROVIDED. THE PLAN |
| | SHOWS THE AREA WHICH WAS FORMERLY PART OF THE |
| | RESTAURANT AS MERCANTILE, WAS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY |
| | APPLIED FOR AND ISSUED? |
| | |
| | THE NEW PLAN SHOWS A 2ND PROPOSED EXIT WHICH DOES NOT |
| | APPEAR TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC B 1015.2.1. |
| | REVISE. |
| | |
| | 5. OK |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE BAR SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | FBC A 226, 902. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 7. EVIDENCE THAT THE ADVANCED FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | COURSE WAS TAKEN IS REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO FBPE SO THAT |
| | THE DBPR WEBSITE CAN BE UPDATED (JAMES BIAGI,PE), |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL, FS471.0195. THIS |
| | COMMENT DOES NOT PREVENT THIS PERMIT FROM BEING ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THIS ENGINEER'S DBPR RECORD HAS NOT BEEN |
| | UPDATED. FAILURE TO HAVE IT UPDATED WILL RESULT IN |
| | REPORT TO FBPE AS REQUIRED BY FS471.0195. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REFER ENGINEER TO THIS WEBSITE: |
| | |
| | HTTPS://FBPE.ORG/FLORIDA-APPROVED-ADVANCED-BUILDING-COD |
| | E-COURSE-PROVIDERS/# |
| | |
| | 8. SHEET A1 SHOWS THIS UNIT AS IN THE "NORTH WEST |
| | WING"' NOT CLEAR WHAT THIS MEANS. REVISE THE PLANS AND |
| | APPLICATION TO INCLUDE UNIT NUMBERS. BASED ON THE |
| | PHOTOGRAPH, I WAS ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THIS IS LIKELY |
| | THE UNITS REFERENCED IN COMMENT #3, WHICH ARE IN THE |
| | CENTER OF THE STRIP MALL. IT HAS AN EAST/WEST |
| | ORIENTATION, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS IN A "NORTH WEST |
| | WING." |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 9. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC |
| | 109. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 10. THIS IS NOT A LEVEL 1 ALTERATION AS THE PREVIOUS |
| | ALTERATION (RECONFIGURATION OF WALLS) CREATED A |
| | CONDITION WHICH DID NOT COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA |
| | BUILDING CODE. REVISE; THIS IS A LEVEL II ALTERATION, |
| | FBC EB 504. WHEN A PLAN IS SEVERELY DEFICIENT (MARK S. |
| | BEATTY AR92184) AND LEADS TO A PERMIT ISSUED IN ERROR |
| | DUE TO LACK OF PERTINENT INFORMATION ON THE PLAN, AND |
| | THAT PLAN DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE CODE IN EFFECT AT |
| | THE TIME OF ISSUANCE, YOU CANNOT CONSIDER THIS WORK |
| | "EXISTING". |
| | |
| | PLEASE HAVE MR. BEATTY CONTACT ME; IS HE AWARE OF THIS |
| | ISSUE? |
| | |
| | 11. FBC 107, THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS AND DELEGATED ENGINEERING. A DOOR |
| | DETAIL SIGNED AND SEALED BY THOMAS TWOMEY, PE WAS |
| | INCLUDED AND DOES NOT INCLUDE PANIC DEVICES (STATES "NO |
| | PANIC") AND INCLUDES A LOCK, SEE FBC B 1008. THE DBPR |
| | RECORD FOR THIS ENGINEER ALSO DOES NOT REFLECT THAT HE |
| | HAS TAKEN THE ADVANCED FBC COURSE; SEND EVIDENCE |
| | DIRECTLY TO FBPE TO RESOLVE. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REFER MR. TWOMEY TO THIS SITE: |
| | |
| | HTTPS://FBPE.ORG/FLORIDA-APPROVED-ADVANCED-BUILDING-COD |
| | E-COURSE-PROVIDERS/# |
| | |
| | 12. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80, A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE WILL |
| | BE ASSESSED IF COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED A THIRD TIME. |
| | |
| | 13. REVISE APPLICATION TO INCLUDE UNIT NUMBER(S), FBC |
| | 107. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
