| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-13 12:03:39 | ****HOLDS HAVE BEEN PLACED ON UNITS 26, 27, 28 - NO |
| | PERMITS OR BUSINESS TAX TO BE ISSUED UNTIL THE EXITING |
| | ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED - PERMIT AND BUSINESS TAX |
| | RECEIPT APPLICATIONS MAY BE SUBMITTED BUT WILL NOT BE |
| | ISSUED UNTIL THE EXITING ISSUE IS RESOLVED, SEE COMMENT |
| | #3**** |
| | |
| | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1. P1 HAS INCORRECT JOB INFORMATION IN THE TITLE BLOCK, |
| | REVISE. |
| | |
| | 2. THIS PROPERTY HAS A NUMBER OF EXPIRED PERMITS, |
| | PLEASE CONTACT [email protected] TO RESOLVE. PLEASE |
| | ADVISE AS TO ACTION PROPOSED TO GET THE EXPIRED PERMITS |
| | CLOSED. PERMITS AND APPLICATIONS EXPIRE AFTER 180 DAYS |
| | OF INACTIVITY; NOTE THAT SOME PERMITS OR PERMIT |
| | APPLICATIONS MAY BE EXPIRED EVEN IF OUR SYSTEM SHOW |
| | THEM IN "OPEN" STATUS RATHER THAN "EXPIRED". |
| | |
| | 3. THIS RESTAURANT AREA PREVIOUSLY OCCUPIED UNITS 26, |
| | 27, AND 28 (WALL SEPARATING UNITS 27 AND 28 REMOVED |
| | WITH PERMIT 12060109, COMBINED UNITS 26-28 RENOVATED |
| | INTO ONE RESTAURANT). UNIT 28 THEN PROVIDED THE |
| | REQUIRED SECOND EXIT. |
| | |
| | PERMIT #17010091, PLAN PREPARED BY MARK S. BEATTY |
| | AR92184 WAS SUBMITTED AND ISSUED TO SEPARATE UNIT 28 |
| | FROM UNITS 26/27. THE PLAN DID NOT SHOW EXISTING |
| | OCCUPANCY OR ROOM DESIGNATIONS. THIS PERMIT CREATED A |
| | LIFE SAFETY ISSUE WHICH MUST BE CORRECTED BEFORE UNITS |
| | 26/27 CAN BE OCCUPIED. |
| | |
| | THE DINING AREA, WITH AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 151, HAS BEEN |
| | DESIGNED TO HAVE ONLY ONE COMPLIANT EXIT, TWO REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | PAPA RECORDS SHOW YEAR BUILT AS 1987. STANDARD BUILDING |
| | CODE 1982 (ALSO SBC1985, SBC1988) REQUIREMENTS WERE |
| | SIMILAR TO CURRENT CODE - TWO EXITS REQUIRED, EXITING |
| | THROUGH KITCHENS PROHIBITED. |
| | |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHY PERMIT 17010091 DID NOT DISCLOSE |
| | THAT INSTALLATION OF A WALL CREATED AN EXITING ISSUE, |
| | AND WHY PERMIT APPLICATION 17060359 DID NOT CORRECT THE |
| | LIFE SAFETY VIOLATION. |
| | |
| | 5. THE SEATING PLAN ON A4 DOES NOT INCLUDE AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, FBC A CHAPTER 4, COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | ACCESSIBLE SEATING REQUIREMENTS NOT SHOWN. ALTHOUGH |
| | THIS REVIEW DOES NOT COVER MOVEABLE SEATS, A PLAN WHICH |
| | OBVIOUSLY DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAW CANNOT BE |
| | STAMPED AS APPROVED. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE BAR SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | FBC A 226, 902. |
| | |
| | 7. EVIDENCE THAT THE ADVANCED FLORIDA BUILDING CODE |
| | COURSE WAS TAKEN IS REQUIRED TO BE SENT TO FBPE SO THAT |
| | THE DBPR WEBSITE CAN BE UPDATED (JAMES BIAGI,PE), |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL, FS471.0195. THIS |
| | COMMENT DOES NOT PREVENT THIS PERMIT FROM BEING ISSUED. |
| | |
| | 8. SHEET A1 SHOWS THIS UNIT AS IN THE "NORTH WEST |
| | WING"' NOT CLEAR WHAT THIS MEANS. REVISE THE PLANS AND |
| | APPLICATION TO INCLUDE UNIT NUMBERS. BASED ON THE |
| | PHOTOGRAPH, I WAS ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT THIS IS LIKELY |
| | THE UNITS REFERENCED IN COMMENT #3, WHICH ARE IN THE |
| | CENTER OF THE STRIP MALL. IT HAS AN EAST/WEST |
| | ORIENTATION, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS IS IN A "NORTH WEST |
| | WING." |
| | |
| | 9. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC |
| | 109. |
