| Date |
Text |
| 2017-11-28 16:03:16 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION/ALTERATION SIXTH BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | BUILDING REVIEW MAY BE APPROVED WITH PROVISO: PROVISO |
| | MEANS THAT CONTRACTOR MAY SUBMIT REQUIRED REVISED |
| | INFORMATION AFTER THE PERMIT IS ISSUED, BUT BEFORE ANY |
| | INSPECTIONS TO AVOID CONFLICTS/DELAYS. CONTRACTOR TO |
| | ADVICE IF THE PROVISO OPTION IS PREFERRED AT THIS TIME. |
| | REVISION FEES APPLY IF INFORMATION IS SUBMITTED AFTER |
| | THE PERMIT IS ISSUED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | 1- EQUIPMENT SPECIFIED ON THE NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | SUBMITTED DOESN'T MATCH EQUIPMENT SHOWN ON THE A/C PLAN |
| | SUBMITTED. EQUIPMENT SIZE AND MANUFACTURER DON'T MATCH. |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | NOTE: COORDINATE WITH EQUIPMENT CALCULATIONS REQUESTED |
| | ON THE MECHANICAL REVIEW. SEE MECHANICAL REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2- NEW ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM 405-2014 SUBMITTED: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS IS TAKING |
| | THE "WHOLE HOUSE FAN OPTION". IN ORDER TO TAKE THIS |
| | CREDIT THE REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R405.7.5 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014) MUST BE MET. |
| | ARCHITECTURAL PLANS DON'T SHOW ANY INFORMATION FOR |
| | WHOLE HOUSE FAN. PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS TO PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS SHOWING HOW THESE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | IT LOOKS LIKE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE REVISED BUT |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WERE NOT RESUBMITTED IN ITS |
| | ENTIRETY. ONLY A COUPLE OF PAGES WERE RESUBMITTED. |
| | SUBMIT 2 COPIES OF COMPLETE REVISED ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) DOORS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS. CLARIFY WHICH INSULATED DOORS ARE LOCATED EAST |
| | AND WEST. REVISE AS REQUIRED TO MATCH PLANS AND PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS SUBMITTED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | CALCULATIONS WERE REVISED BUT THEY DON'T MATCH PLANS. |
| | WHICH 36"X80" INSULATED DOOR IS LOCATED IN THE SOUTH |
| | WALL?. AND, WHICH 26"X80" INSULATED DOOR IS LOCATED IN |
| | THE NORTH WALL?. NOTE: ONLY THE DOORS THAT SEPARATE A/C |
| | AREA FROM NON A/C AREA ARE THE ONES TO BE CONSIDERED. |
| | |
| | 2- TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED; |
| | A) ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | TRUSS PACKAGE BEFORE SUBMITTAL TO THIS OFFICE. SEC. |
| | 107.3.4.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW STAMP IS MISSING THE ARCHITECT'S |
| | INFORMATION. IT DOESN'T IDENTIFY WHO REVIEW THE TRUSS |
| | PACKAGE. PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS REVIEW STAMP THAT |
| | INCLUDES THE ARCHITECT'S INFORMATION. |
| | |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
