| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-02 09:45:25 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | ARCHITECT OF RECORD: JEFFREY W. SMITH, AR9772 |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD: DAVID R. CARMO, PE35857 |
| | |
| | THIS SUBMITTAL WAS PULLED FROM REVIEW ON 6/2/2017 DUE |
| | TO PLANS WHICH LACK ENOUGH INFORMATION TO PERFORM A |
| | BASIC PLAN REVIEW |
| | |
| | 1. FBC EXISTING BUILDING CODE 301.1 STATES THAT "THE . |
| | . . ALTERATION . . . OF ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH ONE OF THE METHODS LISTED IN SECTIONS |
| | 301.1.1 THROUGH 301.1.3 AS SELECTED BY THE APPLICANT. |
| | APPLICATION OF A METHOD SHALL BE THE SOLE BASIS FOR |
| | ASSESSING THE COMPLIANCE OF WORK PERFORMED UNDER A |
| | SINGLE PERMIT UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED BY THE CODE |
| | OFFICIAL." |
| | |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THE METHOD OF COMPLIANCE WAS NOT |
| | SELECTED BY EITHER ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER. WITHOUT THIS |
| | INFORMATION, CORRECT CODE REFERENCES IN THE EXISTING |
| | BUILDING CODE CANNOT BE PROVIDED. IF THIS INFORMATION |
| | IS IN THE PLANS SUBMITTED, PLEASE ADVISE. |
| | |
| | 2. INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 2014 |
| | EXISTING BUILDING ??? REGARDING CONSTRUCTION IN THE |
| | SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SEE INDEX FOR MULTIPLE CODE |
| | REFERENCES; SEVERAL PATHS FOR COMPLIANCE, NOT CLEAR |
| | WHICH IS SELECTED SO THE EXACT CODE REFERENCE CANNOT BE |
| | PROVIDED AT THIS TIME) |
| | |
| | FBC 2014 RESIDENTIAL 301.1, 322, THIS PROPERTY IS |
| | LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA WITH A BASE |
| | FLOOD ELEVATION OF 7' NGVD29 / 7' NAVD88; DESIGN FLOOD |
| | ELEVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 9.5 NGVD29 (PENDING BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL DECISION). EXISTING FLOOR IS AT 7' 1.5" |
| | NGVD29. |
| | |
| | BASED ON PROPERTY APPRAISER VALUATION ($329,065 FOR THE |
| | STRUCTURES) AND SCOPE OF WORK, FIVE YEAR CUMULATIVE |
| | ($560,000), THIS APPEARS TO BE A SUBSTANTIAL |
| | IMPROVEMENT. |
| | |
| | A SHEETS AND S SHEETS DO NOT ADDRESS FLOOD LOADS. |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH NFIP (FEMA) REQUIREMENTS AS WELL AS THE |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE IS NOT CLEAR; IT IS NOT CLEAR IF |
| | THE DESIGN PROPOSED CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. |
| | |
| | 3. COMMENTS #1 AND #2 ARE TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO |
| | REVIEW. APPLICANT MAY REQUEST A REFUND FOR PLAN REVIEW |
| | FEES PAID. IF APPLICANT ELECTS TO PROCEED, A NEW PERMIT |
| | NUMBER AND APPLICATION DATE MAY BE ASSIGNED. |
| | |
| | 4. YOU MAY FIND THE FOLLOWING WEBSITES HELPFUL: |
| | |
| | HTTPS://WWW.FEMA.GOV/MEDIA-LIBRARY-DATA/1411731781834-D |
| | 0C7D7F9FF0D195CE3C33901BA73DAAC/REDUCINGFLOODLOSSES_4TH |
| | ED_FINAL_508.PDF |
| | |
| | HTTPS://WWW.FEMA.GOV/MEDIA-LIBRARY-DATA/20130726-1734-2 |
| | 5045-8822/FEMA_P_758_CVR_TOC_R2.PDF |
| | |
| | |
