| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-01 16:34:15 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | 1) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF A RECENT SURVEY SHOWING THE |
| | EXISTING LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS. TWO OF THE THREE SHEETS |
| | THAT YOU PROVIDED ARE FROM THE EARLY 90'S AND ARE |
| | OBSOLETE. YOU NEED TO BASE YOUR SITE PLAN ON EXISTING |
| | CONDITIONS. PLEASE NOTE: YOU CAN'T REPLACE WHAT DOES |
| | NOT EXIST. |
| | |
| | 2) PROVIDE TWO COPIES OF THE SITE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE |
| | THAT SHEET E1.1 IS NOT AN ACCURATE BASE SITE PLAN FOR |
| | EXISTING CONDITIONS (THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE |
| | NOW CONTAINS THREE PARKING SPACES WHERE ONE LIGHT POLE |
| | IS SHOWN) BUT IT DIFFERS FROM THE RECENTLY APPROVED |
| | SITE PLAN THAT YOU INCLUDED AS SHEET 1 OF 5). |
| | |
| | 3) PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO VERIFY THAT THERE IS |
| | NO GLARE BEING CAST ONTO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL |
| | PROPERTIES OR THE PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THE CITY |
| | STANDARD IS THAT ILLUMINATION LEVELS SHALL NOT EXCEED |
| | ONE FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY AND THAT GLARE |
| | DOES NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOT CANDLES IN A RESIDENTIAL |
| | DISTRICT. |
| | |
| | 4) THE PLAN SHOWS THE REPLACEMENT OF FOUR POLES (TYPE |
| | 1) ALONG DIXIE HIGHWAY ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PARKING |
| | GARAGE. CURRENTLY, TWO OF THE POLES HAVE BEEN REMOVED |
| | (ONLY THE BASE STILL REMAINS). PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THEY |
| | WERE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 5) THE PLAN SHOWS THE REPLACEMENT OF NINE POLES (TYPE |
| | 3) ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES AND THE PARKING LOT TO THE |
| | WEST OF THE BUILDING. CURRENTLY, THE TWO WESTERN POLES |
| | ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES HAVE BEEN REMOVED. PLEASE |
| | EXPLAIN WHY THEY WERE REMOVED. AS MENTIONED IN COMMENT |
| | NO. 1, THERE NO LONGER IS A POLE WHERE THE PARKING |
| | SPACES NOW EXIST. ADDITIONALLY, THE NORTHERNMOST POLE |
| | IS IN A LOCATION WHERE A NEW PARKING SPACE IS PLANNED. |
| | IT SEEMS COUNTER INTUITIVE TO REPLACE THIS POLE IN A |
| | LOCATION WHERE IT IS SLATED TO BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 6) THE NARRATIVE STATES 12 BOLLARDS WILL BE REPLACED. |
| | THE PLANS SHOW EIGHT BOLLARDS. HOWEVER, THE EXISTING |
| | SITE ONLY CONTAINS SIX BOLLARDS. |
| | |
| | 7) THE NARRATIVE STATES THAT THERE ARE 10 WALL PACKS |
| | (TYPE 5) BEING REPLACED. THE PLANS SHOW SIX TYPE 5 |
| | LIGHTS; HOWEVER, THESE LIGHTS ARE SHOWN IN A SODDED |
| | LANDSCAPE AREA WHERE NO LIGHTS EXIST OR A WALL TO MOUNT |
| | THEM ON. PLEASE REVIEW YOUR PLANS. |
| | |
| | 8) PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF LIGHT TYPE 6 FROM |
| | GRADE. |
| | |
| | 9) MANY OF THE TYPE 7 POLES ARE NOT IN THE LOCATIONS |
| | APPROVED ON THE LATEST SITE PLAN. YOU HAVE SHOWN THEM |
| | IN DIFFERENT LOCATIONS ON YOUR MARKUP, WHICH PUTS THEM |
| | INTO DIRECT CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED TREES. THE POLES |
| | MUST GO IN THE APPROVED LOCATIONS. |
| | |
| | 10) PROVIDE THE OVERALL HEIGHT OF LIGHT TYPE 7 FROM |
| | GRADE. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| 2017-05-19 17:04:41 | ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER |
