| Date |
Text |
| 2017-05-24 18:10:31 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) RE-ROOF SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | NEED SIGNED AND SEALED RAS 117 CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) |
| | AS REQUIRED BY GENERAL LIMITATION #7 ON LAST PAGE OF |
| | NOA 13-1022.15 SUBMITTED. NOTE: HOUSE IS LOCATED IN |
| | EXPOSURE "D". TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN DOING |
| | THE CALCULATIONS. CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED TO MEET THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ENGINEER TO REVISE THE RAS 117 CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | (A) ACCORDING TO SEC. R301.2.1.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, THIS |
| | BUILDING IS LOCATED IN EXPOSURE "D" NOT EXPOSURE "C". |
| | REVISE THE EXPOSURE AND THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | ACCORDINGLY. |
| | NOTE: THIS WAS NOTED ON MY ORIGINAL COMMENT TO HELP |
| | EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | (B) SCOPE OF WORK IS NOT CLEAR. THIS IS NOT A "RECOVER" |
| | ROOF PROJECT. THIS IS A RE-ROOF PROJECT. SEE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL SUBMITTED AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | (C) SPECIFIC ROOFING ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED IS NOT |
| | CLEAR. THE SYSTEM TYPE SPECIFIED BY THE ENGINEER IS: "A |
| | PAGE 6,7". THIS IS AN INSULATED SYSTEM. IT DOESN'T |
| | MATCH THE SYSTEM TYPE HIGHLIGHTED BY THE ROOFING |
| | CONTRACTOR. ROOFING CONTRACTOR HIGHLIGHTED A |
| | NON-INSULATED SYSTEM TYPE E ON PAGE 14 AND 15 OF 16. |
| | COORDINATE WITH ROOFING CONTRACTOR EXACT SYSTEM TO BE |
| | INSTALLED AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
