| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-08 14:30:37 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. |
| | BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF PAID |
| | RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF |
| | THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | |
| | 2- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R101.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). NOTE: PLEASE MAKE SURE CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | COMPLETE AND CORRECT. OWNER TO CERTIFY AT THE BOTTOM OF |
| | THE FORM CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 3- PROPOSED ADDITION IS LOCATED NEXT TO THE EXISTING |
| | MASTER BEDROOM. A WINDOW WAS ELIMINATED TO ALLOW FOR |
| | THE ADDITION. SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE BEDROOM EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS. SPECIFY SIZE AND TYPE OF EXISTING BEDROOM |
| | WINDOW THAT IS GOING TO BE BLOCKED TO ALLOW FOR THE |
| | ADDITION. AND, SPECIFY SIZE AND TYPE OF ANY WINDOW ON |
| | THE REMAINING EXTERIOR BEDROOM WALL TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. SEC. 704 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014) AND SEC. R310 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 4- FOOTING SIZE SPECIFIED ON THE TYPICAL WALL SECTION |
| | DOESN'T MATCH SIZE SHOWN ON THE FOUNDATION PLAN. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED TO MATCH. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- BUILDING CODE REFERENCED ON THE UPPER LEFT HAND SIDE |
| | OF SHEET 1 IS INCORRECT. THE CURRENT CODE IS THE FBC- |
| | 2014 NOT FBC-2010. REVISE AS REQUIRED. CHAPTER 553 F.S. |
| | ALSO, CLARIFY WHAT'S BUILDING CATEGORY III THAT IS |
| | SPECIFIED ON THE SAME CODE INFORMATION CHART. WHERE WAS |
| | THIS INFORMATION TAKEN FROM?. DOES ENGINEER MEANS |
| | CONSTRUCTION TYPE?. IF SO, THEN THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE |
| | IS INCORRECT. CONSTRUCTION TYPE WILL BE TYPE VB. SEE |
| | TABLE 601 AND SEC. 602.5 FBC-BUILDING, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014) AND REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE OF |
| | WINDOWS TO BE INSTALLED. ARE THEY FIXED OR OPERABLE |
| | WINDOWS?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO SPECIFY ON PLANS HOW COMPLYING |
| | WITH THE VENTILATION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BATHROOM AND |
| | THE WATER CLOSET COMPARTEMENT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | R303.3 FBCB-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 8- TYPICAL WALL SECTION ON SHEET 1: |
| | A) ROOF PITCH OF 3:12 REQUIRES TWO LAYERS OF |
| | UNDERLAYMENT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R905.2.2 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE SPECIFICATIONS AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | B) SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHINGLES UNDERLAYMENT AND ROOF |
| | SHEATHING ARE NOT CLEAR AND ARE INCOMPLETE. PROVIDE |
| | CLEAR AND COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR SHINGLES |
| | UNDERLAYMENT FASTENING AND ROOF SHEATHING FASTENING. |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SPECIFIC TYPE |
| | OF NAILS TO BE USED. SEC. R803.2.3.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | C) SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT |
| | CLEAR. WHAT'S 1/2" SOFFIT"? PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SOFFIT CONSTRUCTION SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R703.1.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. SPECIFY |
| | MATERIALS AND FASTENING. |
| | |
| | 9- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | A) EXTERIOR SWING DOOR AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | B) FIBERGLASS SHINGLES AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) WINDOWS AS SPECIFIED ON PLANS. |
| | |
| | D) SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON PLANS AND |
| | DETAILS. PROVIDE ONLY THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR |
| | ENGINEER OF RECORD TO LIST THE FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | E) HURRICANE SHUTTERS IF THE WINDOWS AND DOOR WITH |
| | GLAZING DON'T HAVE IMPACT GLASS. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. SEE CITY SAMPLE. |
| | |
| | 10- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 17.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 11- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW. VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, |
| | CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT (EVEN FOR |
| | OWNER/BUILDERS) AND ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS |
| | UPDATED TO $25,000 +/-. THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS |
| | $609.56. |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
