| Date |
Text |
| 2017-05-04 12:58:12 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SP 1 - A INDUSTRIAL ZONING IS INDICATED; HOWEVER, |
| | THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION PER NFPA 101 IS NOT. |
| | |
| | 6.1 CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPANCY. |
| | 6.1.1 GENERAL. |
| | 6.1.1.1 OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION. THE OCCUPANCY OF A |
| | BUILDING OR STRUCTURE, OR PORTION OF A BUILDING OR |
| | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE CLASSIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 6.1.2 |
| | THROUGH 6.1.13. OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION SHALL BE |
| | SUBJECT TO THE RULING OF THE AUTHORITY HAVING |
| | JURISDICTION WHERE THERE IS A QUESTION OF PROPER |
| | CLASSIFICATION IN ANY INDIVIDUAL CASE. |
| | |
| | 6.1.14 MULTIPLE OCCUPANCIES. |
| | 6.1.14.1 GENERAL. |
| | 6.1.14.1.1 MULTIPLE OCCUPANCIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF 6.1.14.1 AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) MIXED OCCUPANCIES ? 6.1.14.3 |
| | (2) SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES ? 6.1.14.4 |
| | |
| | WHAT IS THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION AND IS IT MIXED OR |
| | SEPARATED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET 1.0 - THE EXISTING DOOR LEADING FROM THE |
| | OFFICE AREA TO THE NEW WAREHOUSE IS NOT INDICATED WITH |
| | A FIRE RATING. PER # 1 ABOVE FIRE SEPARATION RATING MAY |
| | BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CORRECT OR CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET E 1.0 - THERE IS NOT EXIT SIGN AT THE NEW |
| | WAREHOUSE MAN DOOR. AN EXIT IS REQUIRED FROM THIS NEW |
| | SPACE AND IT IS REQUIRED TO BE ILLUMINATED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CORRECT OR CLARITY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
