| Date |
Text |
| 2017-04-11 13:25:44 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) |
| | SHEET CS - THERE IS AN INCORRECT REFERENCE TO THE |
| | CURRENT FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING |
| | THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER |
| | APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. |
| | FIRE SPRINKLER WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF NFPA 13, 2010 EDITION. |
| | FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | NFPA 72, 2010 EDITION. |
| | CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | NFPA 241, 2009 EDITION. |
| | |
| | |
| | PLEASE ENSURE THE PROJECT MEETS THE ABOVE REQUIRMENTS |
| | AND CORRECT THE THE REFENCES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) |
| | SHEET CS - THERE IS AN INDICATION OF MIXED USE; |
| | HOWEVER, WHAT IS THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, MIXED OR |
| | SEPARATED OCCUPANCY AND WHICH IS THE MOST STRINGENT YOU |
| | ARE COMPLYING WITH? |
| | |
| | 6.1.14 MULTIPLE OCCUPANCIES. |
| | 6.1.14.1 GENERAL. |
| | 6.1.14.1.1 MULTIPLE OCCUPANCIES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF 6.1.14.1 AND ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1) MIXED OCCUPANCIES ? 6.1.14.3 |
| | (2) SEPARATED OCCUPANCIES ? 6.1.14.4 |
| | 6.1.14.1.2 WHERE EXIT ACCESS FROM AN OCCUPANCY |
| | TRAVERSES ANOTHER OCCUPANCY, THE MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY |
| | SHALL BE TREATED AS A MIXED OCCUPANCY. |
| | |
| | 6.1.14.2.2 MIXED OCCUPANCY. A MULTIPLE OCCUPANCY WHERE |
| | THE OCCUPANCIES ARE INTERMINGLED. |
| | |
| | 6.1.14.3 MIXED OCCUPANCIES. |
| | 6.1.14.3.1 EACH PORTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE |
| | CLASSIFIED AS TO ITS USE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6.1 |
| | 6.1.14.3.2* THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MOST |
| | RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OCCUPANCIES INVOLVED, |
| | UNLESS SEPARATE SAFEGUARDS ARE APPROVED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE SPECIFIC DETAIL. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) |
| | BASED ON THE ABOVE MIXED OCCUPANCY, EXIT SEPARATION |
| | SHALL BE PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, MEANS OF EGRESS. THE |
| | SEPARATION DISTANCE IS NOT INDICATED. |
| | |
| | 7.5.1.3.3 IN BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN |
| | APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7, THE MINIMUM SEPARATION |
| | DISTANCE BETWEEN TWO EXITS, EXIT ACCESSES, OR EXIT |
| | DISCHARGES, MEASURED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 7.5.1.3.2, |
| | SHALL BE NOT LESS THAN ONE-THIRD THE LENGTH OF THE |
| | MAXIMUM OVERALL DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE BUILDING OR |
| | AREA TO BE SERVED. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW UNDER THE OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION |
| | DETERMINED ABOVE AND ENSURE COMPLIANCE OR CORRECT. |
| | |
| | THE CORRIDOR LEADS TO A CONTRACTOR AREA. |
| | |
| | 7.5.1.2 CORRIDORS SHALL PROVIDE EXIT ACCESS WITHOUT |
| | PASSING THROUGH ANY INTERVENING ROOMS OTHER THAN |
| | CORRIDORS, LOBBIES, AND OTHER SPACES PERMITTED TO BE |
| | OPEN TO THE CORRIDOR, UNLESS OTHERWISE PROVIDED IN |
| | 7.5.1.2.1 AND 7.5.1.2.2. |
| | 7.5.1.2.1 APPROVED EXISTING CORRIDORS THAT REQUIRE |
| | PASSAGE THROUGH A ROOM TO ACCESS AN EXIT SHALL BE |
| | PERMITTED TO CONTINUE TO BE USED, PROVIDED THAT ALL OF |
| | THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET: |
| | (1) THE PATH OF TRAVEL IS MARKED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | SECTION 7.10. |
| | (2) DOORS TO SUCH ROOMS COMPLY WITH 7.2.1. |
| | (3) SUCH ARRANGEMENT IS NOT PROHIBITED BY THE |
| | APPLICABLE OCCUPANCY CHAPTER. |
| | |
| | PLEASE ENSURE THE OCCUPANCY CHAPTER DETERMINED BY # 2 |
| | ABOVE ALLOWS THIS TYPE OF CORRIDOR USE. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) |
| | SHEET 6.0 - THE DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATES TYPE B FOR THE |
| | DOORS 107 & 114 IN THE RATED WALLS. TYPE B DOORS |
| | INDICATE WINDOWS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE MANUFACTURES SPEC SHEETS THAT THE GLASS |
| | MEETS THE RATED DOOR REQUIRERMENTS AND/OR PROVIDE AN |
| | APLLICABLE NOTE OF COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) |
| | SHEET A 1.1 - RACKS ARE INDICATED WITH RACKS ABOVE 12'. |
| | |
| | A SEPARATE PERMIT UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS IS |
| | REQUIRED FOR RACK STROAGE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HAZARD |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF THE STORAGE MATERILAS, INCLUDING |
| | PALLETS, PACKAGING, SHRINK WRAP, ETC. |
| | |
| | THE EXISTING SPRINKLER SYSTEM MAY REQUIRE SIGNIFICANT |
| | UPGRADES TO MEET THE SIZE AND AMOUNT OF THE COMMODITY. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPLICABLE NOTE INTENDING TO COMPLY |
| | WITH HIGH-PILED COMBUSTIBLE STORAGE, NFPA 230 AND NFPA |
| | 13.. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 7) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
