| Date |
Text |
| 2017-03-20 17:01:37 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) |
| | SHEET A 0.0 - THERE IS A NEW DOOR PROPOSED IN THE |
| | CORRIDOR. IT APPEARS THAT THIS SECTION OF THE HOSPITAL |
| | MAY BE WITHIN AN EXISITNG SMOKE BARRIER. DOES THIS |
| | PROSED DOOR CONFLICT WITH THE ORIGINAL SMOKE BARRIER |
| | REQUIREMENTS AND/OR AFFECT ANY SMIOKE REMOVAL |
| | CALCULATION AIR REQUIRERMENETS. |
| | |
| | DOES THIS DOOR NEED ANY SPECIAL SEALING AND OR |
| | HARDWARE? |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A REVEIW AND/ OR CHANGE.. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) |
| | SHEET A 1.0 - DOOR # 2 DOES NOT SHOW ANY HARDWARE OR |
| | LOCKING EQUIPMENT. THIS DOOR IS PROPOSED IN AN EXIT |
| | CORRIDOR. WHAT OCCUPANY NUMBER DOES IT SERVE? IS EXIT |
| | OR PANIC HARDWARE REQUIRED? DOES IT LOCK OR LATCH? DOES |
| | IT HAVE A KEY OR THUMB LOCKING BOLT? |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE APPLICABLE EXIT EQUIPMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) |
| | SHEET A 1.0 - DOOR # 1 DOES NOT SHOW ANY HARDWARE OR |
| | LOCKING EQUIPMENT. WILL THIS DOOR BE LOCKABLE? THE LOCK |
| | MUST MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, |
| | MENAS OF EGRESS AND CAN NOT BE LOCK IN THE PATH OF |
| | EGRESS UNLESS MEETING THOSE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A REVIEW AND/OR CHANGE |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) |
| | SHEET A 1.0 & E 0.1 - THE PROPOSED DOOR IN THE CORRIDOR |
| | IS NOT SHOWN WITH AN EXIT LIGHT LEADING TO THE EXIT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REIVEW AND PROVIDE FOR THE APPLICABLE EXIT |
| | SIGNAGE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
