| Date |
Text |
| 2017-03-23 17:57:40 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1. ALS1.1 LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS STATES THAT SF AREA |
| | IS 2367, BUT IT APPEARS THAT AN ADDITION IS PROPOSED. |
| | REVISE PLAN TO SHOW EXISTING SF AREA, PROPOSED NEW, NEW |
| | TOTAL; AREA SUMMARY SHOULD INCLUDE BOTH UNDER AIR AND |
| | OUTDOOR CALCS SEPARATELY, AREA SUMMARY SHOULD INCLUDE |
| | MEZZANINE, FBC 107, FBC EB CHAPTER 11. |
| | |
| | 2. ALS1.1 STATES THIS IS A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. OUR |
| | RECORDS APPEAR TO SHOW THE HISTORY OF THIS STRUCTURE AS |
| | CONSTRUCTED AS A RESTAURANT WITH CONTINUED USE AS A |
| | RESTAURANT. EITHER REVISE TO REMOVE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY |
| | DESIGNATION, OR CLARIFY BY INCLUDING EXISTING OCCUPANCY |
| | AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FBC EB |
| | CHAPTER 10 AS APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | 3. THIS APPEARS TO INCLUDE AN ADDITION; REVISE TO |
| | INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION, FBC EB CHAPTER 11. AN |
| | ACCURATE PLAN REVIEW WITH CORRECT CODE REFERENCES |
| | CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME. THEREFORE, A GENERAL PLAN |
| | REVIEW WILL BE PERFORMED. |
| | |
| | 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY, FBC |
| | 107, FBC B TABLE 602, TABLE 705.8. |
| | |
| | 5. FBC B 1008.2, 1008.1.10, OCCUPANT LOAD THAT THE GATE |
| | SERVES IS NOT CLEAR. EXIT STRATEGY NOT CLEAR. IT |
| | APPEARS THAT TWO EXITS ARE REQUIRED, BUT THE REAR EXIT |
| | DOOR APPEARS TO ROUTE THE OCCUPANT TO THE FRONT EXIT. |
| | |
| | REVISE PLAN TO SHOW THE TWO EXITS REQUIRED, CONTINUOUS |
| | TO THE PUBLIC WAY. IF THE PLAN IS NOT REVISED TO |
| | INCLUDE THE PATIO GATE AS HAVING PANIC BARS AND |
| | UTILIZED AS THE SECOND EXIT, SEND THE PROPOSED LIFE |
| | SAFETY PLAN VIA EMAIL FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 6. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC |
| | 109. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE COST BREAKDOWN FOR THIS JOB. |
| | VALUE IS TO INCLUDE LABOR, MATERIALS, OVERHEAD, PROFIT, |
| | DESIGN FEES, EVEN IF PROVIDED BY OTHERS. VALUE APPEARS |
| | TOO LOW. |
| | |
| | 7. FBC A 220.1.1, IT APPEARS THAT INTENT IS THAT |
| | VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY WILL NOT BE PROVIDED TO THE |
| | MEZZANINE. REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY UNDER WHICH EXEMPTION |
| | THIS FALLS. REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY THAT THE PROPOSED |
| | SPACE MEETS ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF SELECTED |
| | EXEMPTION(S). |
| | |
| | 8. NO EXIT SIGNS ARE SHOWN IN THE PATIO; REVISE TO ADD, |
| | FBC 1011.1. |
| | |
| | 9. FBC 1003.6, SOFT SEATING 101 TO PATIO, FBC B 1003.6, |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THE FOLDING DOOR COMPLIES WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 10. FBC B 1004.5, B 1027.1, IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THE OCCUPANT, AFTER BEING DIRECTED TO THE |
| | REAR EXIT DOOR, IS FORCED TO REENTER THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 10. FBC B CHAPTER 2, 505, THE PROPOSED MEZZANINE DOES |
| | NOT APPEAR TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF A MEZZANINE; |
| | REVISE. |
| | |
| | 11. FBC 107, ACCESS TO PROPOSED MEZZANINE, REVISE PLAN |
| | TO INCORPORATE EXCEPTIONS. |
| | |
| | 12. FBC A 902, 904, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | DINING SURFACE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | |
| | 13. PRODUCT APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR COMPONENTS AND |
| | CLADDING, INCLUDING THE ROOF HATCH, FBC B 1609. THIS |
| | MAY BE SUBMITTED AS A REVISION AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE, |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE |
| | REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC |
| | 107. |
| | |
| | 14. ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE PARKING SPACE TO THE |
| | ALTERED AREA NOT CLEAR; REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY, FBC A |
| | 202.3, CHAPTER 4. |
| | |
