| Plan Review Notes For Permit 17020913 |
| Permit Number |
17020913 |
|
| Review Stop |
B |
| Sequence Number |
2 |
|
| Notes |
| Date |
Text |
| 2017-03-27 13:20:13 | ****CORRECTIONS**** | | | | | | SAMANTHA HILL | | | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-805-6724 | | | | | | 1. FBC 107, DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO REVIEW PRODUCT | | | APPROVALS AND DELEGATED ENGINEERING PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. THE DESIGNER OF RECORD IS TO | | | REVIEW THE PRODUCT APPROVALS, EITHER WITH A SHOP | | | DRAWING REVIEW STAMP OR A LETTER. A REFERENCE TO A TYPE | | | OF PRODUCT ON THE PLAN, UNLESS IT SPECIFICALLY | | | REFERENCES THE MANUFACTURER AND PRODUCT, DOES NOT | | | DEMONSTRATE THAT DOR HAS REVIEWED THE SPECIFIC PRODUCT | | | AND METHOD OF INSTALLATION PROPOSED. | | | | | | 2.OK | | | | | | 3. FBC 107, WHEN RESUBMITTING APPLICANT IS TO PREPARE | | | TWO IDENTICAL COLLATED SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS FOR | | | PERMIT ISSUANCE. | | | | | | OLD SHEETS ARE TO BE RETAINED IN THE SUBMITTAL, REMOVED | | | FROM THE TWO PERMIT ISSUE SETS, AND THOSE DOCUMENTS | | | SHOULD BE MARKED "VOID" OR "OLD SHEETS". | | | | | | THE TWO COLLATED PERMIT SETS ARE TO INCLUDE ANY | | | DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED AS WELL AS | | | THE NEW DOCUMENTS WHICH SHOULD ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. | | | | | | 2ND REVIEW, NOT CLEAR WHAT SHOULD BE REVIEWED, NOT | | | CLEAR WHAT IS PROPOSED TO BE ISSUED. NOTHING WAS MARKED | | | VOID. | | | | | | 4. THIS PERMIT WILL NOT BE ISSUED UNTIL THE MASTER IS | | | ISSUED. | | | | | | |
|
