| Date |
Text |
| 2018-09-07 14:27:42 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | W.P.B. PERMIT: 17020796 |
| | 3RD REVIEW: SEPTEMBER 6, 2018 |
| | |
| | DYLAN BATTLES |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER I |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6718 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 6TH EDITION (2017) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | FBC R = FBC RESIDENTIAL |
| | |
| | 1. OK |
| | |
| | 2. COMMENT FROM FIRST REVIEW: A1.2.01 EXIT DISCHARGE |
| | NOT CLEAR; REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B |
| | 1027. |
| | |
| | ON THE ELECTRICAL PAGES, I WAS NOT ABLE TO LOCATE VOICE |
| | EVAC. SHEET E2.1.01 SHOWS A FIRE ALARM CONTROL PANEL, |
| | DETAILS ON E3.1.02, BUT I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE |
| | LABEL "EVAC" ON THE FLOOR PLANS (PER ELECTRICAL LEGEND) |
| | AND E3.1.02 WAS NOT CLEAR. PLEASE DIRECT WHERE THIS |
| | INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND OR CLARIFY INTENT. NOTE THAT |
| | FBC B 1005.3.1 REQUIRES .3" PER OCCUPANT, BUT .2" WAS |
| | USED PER EXCEPTION. |
| | |
| | 2- 3RD REVIEW |
| | MOST OF THIS IS WAS ADDRESSED IN COMMENT RESPONSE, BUT |
| | NOT THE VOICE EVAC PORTION. THE FACP ON SHEET E-3.1.02 |
| | DOESN'T SHOW AS A VOICE EVAC SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | (SEE NEW COMMENTS FROM LIFE SAFETY SHEETS PROVIDED AT |
| | BOTTOM STARTING COMMENT #35) |
| | |
| | 3-6. OK |
| | |
| | 7-11. OK |
| | |
| | 12. 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. ENGINEER OF RECORD IS TO |
| | REVIEW THE SOILS, EITHER WITH A SHOP DRAWING REVIEW |
| | STAMP OR BY INCORPORATING A REFERENCE INTO THE PLAN. |
| | THE SOILS REPORT WAS PROVIDED FOR THE FOUNDATION PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION (17010911). AFTER THE FOUNDATION PERMIT IS |
| | ISSUED, THE SOILS WILL BE PUBLIC RECORD AND IS NOT |
| | NEEDED FOR THIS PERMIT. IF YOU RESUBMIT PRIOR TO |
| | ISSUANCE OF FOUNDATION PERMIT, PLEASE INCLUDE IN YOUR |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 12- 3RD REVIEW THE NOTES ADDED WILL REFER TO SOILS |
| | REPORT FOR BEARING CAPACITY, BUT STRUCTURAL SHEETS |
| | S-2.00, S-2.00A AND S-2.00B SHOW THE TOP OF FOOTERS AT |
| | 12" BELOW GRADE. THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT STATES THAT |
| | TOP OF FOOTERS SHOULD BE PLACED 18" BELOW GRADE. PLEASE |
| | REVIEW AND REVISE AS APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | 13-37. OK (26-28 MOVED TO PROVISO) |
| | |
| | 38. (MOVED TO PROVISO) |
| | |
| | 39-40. OK |
| | |
| | 41. (MOVED TO PROVISO) |
| | |
| | 42. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISOS: |
| | |
| | A. COMPLIANCE WITH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE |
| | 78-123 REQUIRED: MS. SYBILLE WELTER, 561-822-1515, |
| | [email protected]. MS. WELTER WILL ADVISE VIA EMAIL WHEN |
| | THIS IS COMPLETE. |
| | |
| | B. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. SUB PERMITS FOR |
| | MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ARE REQUIRED. SEPARATE |
| | PERMITS (APPLICATION, FEES, PLANS, REVIEWS) REQUIRED |
| | FOR ALL OTHER ITEMS SUCH AS PARKING, SIGNAGE, ETC. |
| | |
| | C. COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 1006, MEANS OF EGRESS |
| | ILLUMINATION, INCLUDING EXIT DISCHARGE, REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | D. VOICE EVAC REQUIRED (NOTE 35, SHEET E3.1.02). |
| | |
| | E. ADVISORY ONLY; THE LANDSCAPE PLANS APPEAR TO |
| | CONFLICT WITH THE EXIT DISCHARGE. LANDSCAPE PERMIT |
| | REQUIRES A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL; PERMIT APPLICATION, |
| | FEES, AND PLANS AND ARE NOT REVIEWED BY BUILDING. |
| | |
| | F. PRODUCT APPROVALS FOR ALL COMPONENTS AND CLADDING |
| | ARE TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF RECORD, |
| | REVIEWED AND ISSUED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | G. SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING ARE REQUIRED TO BE |
| | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND ISSUED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | FAILURE TO DO SO WILL RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. |
| | |
| | H. AN ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTION GUARD RAIL DETAIL IS |
| | REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THIS MAY BE SUBMITTED |
| | AS A SUBMITTAL ALONG WITH THE SHORING/RESHORE, BUT MAY |
| | BE PROVIDED IN THE FIELD TO KEN CONRAD, SUBJECT TO HIS |
| | APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | I. RECORDED REPLAT REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O.; PROVIDE |
| | BOOK/PAGE VIA EMAIL. |
| | |
| | J. BUILT IN BENCHES TO COMPLY WITH FBC A 903. |
| | |
| | K. DRESSING, FITTING AND LOCKER ROOMS TO COMPLY WITH |
| | FBC A 222, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | L. SPA RECEPTION/ RETAIL DESK, ANY OTHER CHECK OUT |
| | AREAS, SEE FBC A 904 NOTE ON PLAN AND PROVIDE A DETAIL |
| | 2ND REVIEW: RESPONSE TO 26, 27, 28 REFERS TO D SHEETS; |
| | THESE PAGES ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED AND IT IS NOT |
| | CLEAR WHO IS TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PAGES. |
| | PLEASE REMOVE THE SHEETS AS IT APPEARS MOST OF THE |
| | INFORMATION IS NOT REQUIRED. ITEMS 26, 27, AND 28 CAN |
| | BE A PROVISO ITEM. |
| | |
| | M. FBC B 603.1, A4.4.02 DETAIL 12 SHOWS POLYSTYRENE |
| | OUTRIGGER AT METAL ROOFS AND POSSIBLY OTHER LOCATIONS, |
| | OTHER DETAILS. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE INFORMATION VIA |
| | EMAIL REGARDING HEIGHT OF LOCATIONS PROPOSED (OVER |
| | 30'?), OVER EXITS. A4.4.03 SHOWS EXTERIOR FOAM; PROVIDE |
| | INFORMATION VIA EMAIL. ARE THESE PRODUCTS |
| | NONCOMBUSTIBLE? |
| | |
| | N. ADVISORY ONLY; SHEET D0.0.00 SHOWS A PLATFORM BED. |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR IF THIS BED COMPLIES WITH FBC A |
| | 806.4(II), OPEN-FRAME TYPE BEDS REQUIRED. THIS WILL BE |
| | A PROVISO ITEM. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 43. [FBC 1011.1]SHEET A-1.2.01 EXIT SIGNS. EXIT SIGNS |
| | ARE ONLY LOCATED AT THE EGRESS DOORS AND NO |
| | INTERMEDIATE SIGNS ARE PROVIDED WHEN THE EGRESS DOOR |
| | ISN'T VISABLE. FLOORS 2-4 DO A GOOD JOB OF THIS, BUT |
| | FIRST FLOOR NEEDS REVIEW OF EXIT SIGN PLACEMENT. |
| | |
| | 44. [FBC 1011.2]FLOOR-LEVEL EXIT SIGNS IN GROUP R-1. |
| | WHERE EXIT SIGNS ARE REQUIRED IN GROUP R-1 OCCUPANCIES |
| | BY SECTION 1011.1, ADDITIONAL LOW-LEVEL EXIT SIGNS |
| | SHALL BE PROVIDED IN ALL AREAS SERVING GUESTROOMS IN |
| | GROUP R-1 OCCUPANCIES AND SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION |
| | 1011.5. |
| | |
| | 45. [FBC 701]GENERAL COMMENT-CHECK THAT LIFE SAFETY |
| | SHEET FOR 1ST FLOOR SHOWS DESIGNATED LINES TO CORESPOND |
| | WITH FIRE RATED WALLS AND THAT FLOORS PLAN WALL TYPES |
| | MATCH THE REQ?D FIRE RATINGS. MAINLY ON SHEET A-1.2.01 |
| | THE CORRIDORS DON?T SHOW THE 1 HOUR RATED DASHED LINES |
| | (SEE BELOW FOR EXAMPLES ON THE FLOOR PLANS) |
| | |
| | 46. [FBC 701]SHEET A-1.4.01B WALLS IN WOMENS LOUNGE AND |
| | SPA THAT DEFINE COORIDOR ARE LABLED TYPE C4 WHICH IS |
| | NON-RATED, BUT LIFE SAFETY STATES ALL CORRIDORS ARE TO |
| | BE 1 HR WHICH WOULD BE TYPE C1 ACCORDING TO SHEET |
| | A-6.6.02. |
| | |
| | 47. [FBC 701]SHEET A-1.4.01A MECH RM 116 SHOWS C1 ON |
| | CORRIDOR WALL, BUT THE REST OF ROOM IS 2 HR. |
| | SAME FOR RM 1112C. ALSO, MECH ROOM 1103A BACK WALL IS |
| | NOT LABELED WITH WALL TYPE. |
| | |
| | 48. [FBC 701]SHEET A-1.4.01A WHY ARE FIRE RATED WALLS |
| | IN RM 1107 & 1108 CALLED OUT FOR THE BATHROOM |
| | PARTITIONS? ARE THEY SUPPOSED TO BE C4 FOR SOUND ONLY? |
| | ALSO, FOR RESTROOMS 1149 & 1150 NO WALL TYPES ARE |
| | SHOWN. |
| | IN GENERAL PLEASE LOOK AT RESTROOMS AND PROVIDE |
| | INTENDED WALL TYPES. |
| | |
| | 49. WHAT IS THE RATING, ASSEMBLY AND GLASS TYPE FOR |
| | WALLS/WINDOWS ATDINING BOOTHS THAT LOOK INTO CORRIDOR |
| | 1122? |
| | |
| | 50. [NO CODE REF]CHECK SHEET A-1.3.01 1ST FLOOR PLAN. |
| | THE PERIMETER HAS A LIGHTER OFF-SET LAYER THAT SHOWS |
| | ITEMS ON A LAYER THAT I THINK SHOULD BE TURNED OFF. |
| | |
| | 51. [FBC ACCESSIBILITY 233.3.1]MINIMUM NUMBER: NEW |
| | CONSTRUCTION. |
| | IN FACILITIES WITH RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST |
| | 5 PERCENT, BUT NO FEWER THAN ONE UNIT, OF THE TOTAL |
| | NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL PROVIDE |
| | MOBILITY FEATURES COMPLYING WITH 809.2 THROUGH 809.4 |
| | AND SHALL BE ON AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AS REQUIRED BY 206. |
| | I SEE 5 ROOMS PROVIDED, BUT 5% OF 150 ROOMS WOULD BE 8 |
| | ROOMS NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH REQUIRED AMOUNT. |
| | |
| | 52. [FBC ACCESSIBILITY 233.3.1.2]RESIDENTIAL DWELLING |
| | UNITS WITH COMMUNICATION FEATURES. |
| | IN FACILITIES WITH RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, AT LEAST |
| | 2 PERCENT, BUT NO FEWER THAN ONE UNIT, OF THE TOTAL |
| | NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS SHALL PROVIDE |
| | COMMUNICATION FEATURES COMPLYING WITH 809.5. |
| | I SEE 11 ROOMS PROVIDED WHICH EXCEEDS THE RE'D 2% (3 |
| | ROOMS). THIS EXCEEDS CODE AND I ONLY MENTION BECAUSE I |
| | WONDER IF SOME OF THESE WERE INTENED TO PROVIDE |
| | MOBILITY FEATURES INSTEAD OF COMMUNICATION FEATURES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
