| Date |
Text |
| 2017-07-12 18:55:12 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, THIRD BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | |
| | 1- NEW COMMENT: ENGINEER OF RECORD CHANGED THE SCOPE OF |
| | WORK SHOWN ON SHEET S-1. ALTERATION LEVEL WAS CHANGED |
| | FROM ALTERATION LEVEL 3 TO ALTERATION LEVEL 2. THIS IS |
| | 100% INCORRECT. THE SCOPE OF WORK IS CLEARLY ALTERATION |
| | LEVEL 3 AS STATED ON PREVIOUS SUBMITTAL. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. SEC. 505 FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). ALSO, THE SCOPE OF WORK WAS REVISED TO STATE |
| | THAT " NO MECHANICAL ON THIS PROJECT". THIS IS |
| | INCORRECT ALSO. MECHANICAL WORK IS REQUIRED BECAUSE |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE HEATING. AND, PROPOSED PLAN SHOWS A NEW |
| | AHU CLOSET AND CONDENSER UNIT OUTSIDE. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2- NEW COMMENT BASED ON THE NEW COMMENT ABOVE, PLANS |
| | NEED TO PROVIDE INFORMATION SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | HEATING REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R303.9 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, |
| | 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 3- ORIGINAL COMMENT: VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION IS TOO LOW BASED ON ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK. |
| | VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S |
| | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. CONTRACTOR TO |
| | REVISE THE VALUE. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. SINCE |
| | IT WAS NOT ADDRESSED AFTER THE 3RD REVIEW, THEN THE |
| | VALUE WAS ESTIMATED TO BE $60,000 +/-. THE PERMIT FEE |
| | BALANCE IS $1488.24. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS THAT MEET THE DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | CALCULATED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD ON SHEET S-2. |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON NEW SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS NOA |
| | 14-0908.09 SUBMITTED DON'T MEET THE ENGINEER'S |
| | CALCULATED DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | NOTE; ENGINEER OF RECORD TO CLARIFY WHY HE APPROVED |
| | THIS SINGLE HUNG PRODUCT APPROVAL IF IT DOESN'T MEET |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES HE CALCULATED. |
| | |
| | 5- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING). ALL DOORS, WINDOWS, WINDOW |
| | MULLIONS PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | 6- ACCORDING TO CITY RECORDS AND PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | PROPERTY APPRAISER THE PROPOSED UTILITY ROOM WAS A |
| | PORCH. AFTER PLANS ARE REVISED, BRING THEM TO PALM |
| | BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD) FOR IMPACT FEES |
| | ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED PLANS AND COPY OF |
| | PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY IMPACT FEE |
| | ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | *****ENGINEER OF RECORD TO PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER |
| | ADDRESSING EACH COMMENT. |
| | NOTE: PLANS MAY BE SENT TO THE BOARD OF ENGINEER'S FOR |
| | REVIEW IF PLANS KEEP FAILING THE PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
