| Date |
Text |
| 2017-08-07 09:51:49 | CODES IN EFFECT: |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2014 5TH EDITION |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ENERGY CONSERVATION 2014 5TH |
| | EDITION |
| | NFPA 70 2011 EDITION, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE |
| | |
| | ELECTRICAL REVIEW STATUS: DENIED, SEE COMMENTS BELOW. |
| | |
| | 1. PREVIOUS COMMENTS # 1 AND 2 NOT ADDRESSED |
| | SATISFACTORILY. THERE ARE SEVERAL DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN |
| | THE PLAN FOR PERMIT 16070183 AND THE PLAN SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THIS PERMIT. AS ONE EXAMPLE, THE NUMBERING OF MAINS AND |
| | THEIR LOCATIONS IS NOT CONSISTENT. ADDITIONALLY, ONE |
| | PLAN STATES THAT MAIN 1 IS 400 AMP SERVICE TO PHASE 1 |
| | WHILE THE OTHER STATES THAT MAIN 1 IS A 225 AMP |
| | SERVICE, BUT THE LOAD CALC SHOWS MAIN 1 WITH AN 800 AMP |
| | LINE GUTTER. SOME OF THE PREVIOUS REQUEST, SUCH AS A |
| | COMMON GROUNDING ELECTRODE SYSTEM ARE NOT SHOWN. WHAT |
| | IS THE MAIN LABELED AS "MAIN A'? IS THIS ON A BUIDLING |
| | WITH A DIFFERENT ADDRESS? WE ADVISE THAT THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBLE COME IN AND MEET WITH THE PLAN |
| | REVIEWER TO EXPLAIN ALL OF THESE DISCREPANCIES. FBC |
| | 107.2.1, NEC 220, 230.2, 250.58, 250.94 |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED |
| | MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RESUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, INSERT CORRECTED PAGES |
| | INTO THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND REMOVE OR VOID THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS. |
| | |
| | SINCERELY, |
| | |
| | JOHN PEARSON |
| | ELECTRICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6746 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
