| Date |
Text |
| 2017-02-08 16:55:32 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET A5 - DOOR 102 IS NOT INDICATED AS BEING RATED. |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7 MEANS OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | 7.1.3.2 EXITS. |
| | 7.1.3.2.1 WHERE THIS CODE REQUIRES AN EXIT TO BE |
| | SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING, THE |
| | SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | SECTION 8.2 AND THE FOLLOWING: |
| | (1)* THE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE |
| | RESISTANCE RATING WHERE THE EXIT CONNECTS THREE OR |
| | FEWER STORIES. |
| | |
| | (8) OPENINGS IN THE SEPARATION SHALL BE PROTECTED BY |
| | FIRE DOOR ASSEMBLIES EQUIPPED WITH DOOR CLOSERS |
| | COMPLYING WITH 7.2.1.8. |
| | |
| | (9)* OPENINGS IN EXIT ENCLOSURES SHALL BE LIMITED TO |
| | DOOR ASSEMBLIES FROM NORMALLY OCCUPIED SPACES AND |
| | CORRIDORS AND DOOR ASSEMBLIES FOR EGRESS FROM THE |
| | ENCLOSURE, |
| | |
| | |
| | FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES AND INCLUDED IN THE NFPA 101 |
| | LIFE SAFETY HANDBOOK THE EXTERIOR DOOR DOES REQUIRED TO |
| | BE RATED; HOWEVER, IT MUST BE CONSIDERED IF THERE IS AN |
| | EXSPOSURE FROM AN ADJACENT SOURCE. |
| | |
| | FOR AREAS ALONG CLEMATIS IT IS COMMON TO PLACE TABLES |
| | AND CHAIRS AND OTHER COMBUSTIBLES ON THE FRONT EXTERIOR |
| | AREAS. FOR FUTURE POTENTIAL PROJECT USE IT IS STRONGLY |
| | RECOMMENDED THAT THIS RATED STAIRWELL DOOR BE RATED |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE ENTIRE STAIRWELL CONSTURCTION |
| | PROPERTIES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET T $ LS 1 - THERE IS INDICATIONS OF THE |
| | INSTALLATION OF A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH SHOP |
| | DRAWINGS. PER FAC THE DESIGN SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH |
| | THE REQUIREMENTS OF FAC 61G. |
| | |
| | PER FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE SECTION 61G15-32.004, |
| | FIRE PROTECTION ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS SHALL INCLUDE THE |
| | POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE WATER SUPPLY, A LIST OF |
| | APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT, |
| | CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR |
| | AREA, SUPPRESSION SYSTEM TYPE, DESIGN DENSITIES, WATER |
| | SUPPLY DATA (FIRE PUMP DATA, HYDRANT FLOW TEST DATA) |
| | AND ANY PERFORMANCE BASED INFORMATION SUCH AS |
| | PRE-ENGINEERED SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | 61G15-32.003 COMMON REQUIREMENTS TO ALL FIRE PROTECTION |
| | ENGINEERING |
| | DOCUMENTS. |
| | (1) THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS TO BE USED |
| | IN THE PREPARATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LAYOUT |
| | DOCUMENTS AND TO INDICATE THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE |
| | WORK, AND TO DESCRIBE, DETAIL, DIMENSION, LABEL AND |
| | DEFINE THE FIRE PROTECTION COMPONENTS, SYSTEM(S), |
| | MATERIALS, ASSEMBLIES, EQUIPMENT AND ITS STRUCTURAL AND |
| | UTILITY SUPPORT SYSTEM(S), INSOFAR AS THEY INVOLVE THE |
| | SAFEGUARDING OF LIFE, HEALTH OR PROPERTY. |
| | (2) THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS |
| | SHALL SPECIFY THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE |
| | ACCEPTANCE TESTING OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM AND |
| | COMPONENTS, WHICH SHALL BE BASED UPON APPLICABLE CODES |
| | AND STANDARDS, WHERE AVAILABLE. |
| | (3) THE OCCUPANCY OF THE AREA OR DESCRIPTION OF A |
| | SPECIFIC HAZARD BEING PROTECTED BY THE FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEM(S) SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| | (4) THE APPLICABLE CODE AND STANDARD TO BE USED IN THE |
| | PREPARATION OF THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM LAYOUT |
| | DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. WHEN CODES AND STANDARDS ARE NOT |
| | AVAILABLE OR APPLICABLE, AND SAID LAYOUT DOCUMENTS ARE |
| | TO BE BASED ON ENGINEERING JUDGMENT, ANY REASONS AND |
| | ASSUMPTIONS MADE TO DEVELOP THE FIRE PROTECTION CONCEPT |
| | SHALL BE IDENTIFIED ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| | (5) STRUCTURAL SUPPORT AND STRUCTURAL OPENINGS REQUIRED |
| | BY THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE |
| | FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS AND SHALL |
| | BE REFERENCED ON STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| | (6) WHEN LAYOUT DOCUMENTS CONTAIN MATERIAL DEVIATION |
| | FROM THE ENGINEER OF RECORD'S FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENT, SUCH LAYOUT DOCUMENTS ARE NOT |
| | COMPLIANT UNLESS THEY ARE ACCOMPANIED BY REVISED |
| | ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS MADE AND SEALED BY THE ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM. |
| | (7) REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIVATION CONTROL SYSTEMS, |
| | SEQUENCE, OPERATING PARAMETERS, INTERLOCKS, SAFETY |
| | RELATED DEVICES, INDICATORS AND ALARMS, SHALL BE SHOWN |
| | ON THE FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, |
| | UNLESS SHOWN ON OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS. |
| | (8) ANY INFORMATION DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY THE ENGINEER |
| | OF RECORD TO ASSIST THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION |
| | IN UNDERSTANDING THE OWNER?S INTENDED USE AND PROPOSED |
| | PROTECTION OF THE BUILDING OR FACILITY AND TO PROVIDE |
| | SUFFICIENT DIRECTION TO THE INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR OR |
| | OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES REGARDING THE LAYOUT OF THE |
| | SYSTEM(S), SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS. |
| | SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.008, 471.033(2), FS |
| | LAW IMPLEMENTED 471.005(7), 471.033(2), FS |
| | HISTORY?NEW 5-19-93, FORMERLY 21H-32.003, AMENDED |
| | 4-2-2000, 6-26-01 |
| | |
| | 61G15-32.004 DESIGN OF WATER BASED FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEMS. |
| | (1) WATER BASED FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS INCLUDE, BUT |
| | ARE NOT LIMITED TO, AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS OF WET, |
| | DRY, FINE WATER SPRAY (MIST), MANUAL, AND DELUGE VALVE |
| | CONTROLLED TYPES, PUMPING SYSTEMS, STANDPIPES, FIRE |
| | WATER MAINS AND DEDICATED FIRE PROTECTION WATER |
| | SOURCES. |
| | (2) TO ENSURE MINIMUM DESIGN QUALITY IN FIRE PROTECTION |
| | SYSTEM ENGINEERING DOCUMENTS, SAID DOCUMENTS SHALL |
| | INCLUDE AS A MINIMUM THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WHEN |
| | APPLICABLE: |
| | (A) THE POINT OF SERVICE FOR THE FIRE PROTECTION WATER |
| | SUPPLY AS DEFINED BY 633.021(18) F.S. |
| | (B) APPLICABLE NFPA STANDARD TO BE APPLIED, OR IN THE |
| | CASE WHERE NO SUCH STANDARD EXISTS, THE ENGINEERING |
| | STUDY, JUDGMENTS, AND/OR PERFORMANCE BASED ANALYSIS AND |
| | CONCLUSIONS. |
| | (C) CLASSIFICATION OF HAZARD OCCUPANCY FOR EACH ROOM OR |
| | AREA. |
| | (D) DESIGN APPROACH, WHICH INCLUDES SYSTEM TYPE, |
| | DENSITIES, DEVICE TEMPERATURE RATING, AND SPACING FOR |
| | EACH SEPARATE 42 HAZARD OCCUPANCY. |
| | (E) CHARACTERISTICS OF WATER SUPPLY TO BE USED, SUCH AS |
| | MAIN SIZE AND LOCATION, WHETHER IT IS DEAD-END OR |
| | CIRCULATING; AND IF DEAD-END, THE DISTANCE TO THE |
| | NEAREST CIRCULATING MAIN, AS WELL AS ITS MINIMUM |
| | DURATION AND RELIABILITY FOR THE MOST HYDRAULICALLY |
| | DEMANDING DESIGN AREA. |
| | (F) WHEN PRIVATE OR PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES ARE USED, THE |
| | FLOW TEST DATA, INCLUDING DATE AND TIME OF TEST, WHO |
| | CONDUCTED TEST OR SUPPLIED INFORMATION, TEST ELEVATION, |
| | STATIC GAUGE PRESSURE AT NO FLOW, FLOW RATE WITH |
| | RESIDUAL GAUGE PRESSURE, HYDRANT BUTT COEFFICIENT, AND |
| | LOCATION OF TEST IN RELATION TO THE HYDRAULIC POINT OF |
| | SERVICE. |
| | (G) VALVING AND ALARM REQUIREMENTS TO MINIMIZE |
| | POTENTIAL FOR IMPAIRMENTS AND UNRECOGNIZED FLOW OF |
| | WATER. |
| | (H) MICROBIAL INDUCED CORROSION (MIC). THE ENGINEER OF |
| | RECORD SHALL MAKE REASONABLE EFFORTS TO IDENTIFY WATER |
| | SUPPLIES THAT COULD LEAD TO MICROBIAL INDUCED CORROSION |
| | (MIC). SUCH EFFORTS MAY CONSIST OF DISCUSSIONS WITH THE |
| | LOCAL WATER PURVEYOR AND/OR FIRE OFFICIAL, FAMILIARITY |
| | WITH CONDITIONS IN THE LOCAL AREA, OR LABORATORY |
| | TESTING OF WATER SUPPLIES. WHEN CONDITIONS ARE FOUND |
| | THAT MAY RESULT IN MIC CONTAMINATION OF THE FIRE |
| | PROTECTION PIPING, THE ENGINEER SHALL DESIGN CORRECTIVE |
| | MEASURES. |
| | (I) BACKFLOW PREVENTION AND METERING SPECIFICATIONS AND |
| | DETAILS TO MEET LOCAL WATER PURVEYOR REQUIREMENTS |
| | INCLUDING MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE PRESSURE DROP. |
| | (J) QUALITY AND PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS OF ALL YARD |
| | AND INTERIOR FIRE PROTECTION COMPONENTS. |
| | (3) CONTRACTOR SUBMITTALS WHICH DEVIATE FROM THE ABOVE |
| | MINIMUM DESIGN PARAMETERS SHALL BE CONSIDERED MATERIAL |
| | DEVIATIONS AND REQUIRE SUPPLEMENTAL ENGINEERING |
| | APPROVAL AND DOCUMENTATION. |
| | (4) IN THE EVENT THE ENGINEER OF RECORD PROVIDES MORE |
| | INFORMATION AND DIRECTION THAN IS ESTABLISHED ABOVE, HE |
| | OR SHE SHALL BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THE TECHNICAL |
| | ACCURACY OF THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE |
| | CODES, STANDARDS, AND SOUND ENGINEERING PRINCIPLES. |
| | SPECIFIC AUTHORITY 471.008, 471.033(2), FS |
| | LAW IMPLEMENTED 471.005(7), 471.033(2), FS |
| | HISTORY?NEW 5-19-93, FORMERLY 21H-32.004, AMENDED |
| | 4-2-2000, 6-26-01, 7-12-05 |
| | |
| | |
| | THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THIS PERMIT IN |
| | PLAN DRAWINGS OR IN NARRATIVE FORM SIGNED AND SEALED BY |
| | THE APPLICABLE QUALIFIED ENGINEER. THE SHOP DRAWINGS |
| | SHALL THEN BE DESIGNED AND SUBMITTED UNDER THOSE |
| | CRITERIA AND SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE PER THE REQUIREMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A1 - THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE REAR STAIR ARE NOT |
| | INDICATED, INCLUDING HAND RAILS, LANDINGS, TREADS, AND |
| | RISERS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE THEM AND ENSURE THE MEET THE REQUIRMENTS |
| | OF THE CODE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET E1 - ON THE FIRST FLOOR, THERE IS AN EXIT SIGN |
| | INDICATED AT THE 1ST REAR EXIT DOOR THAT IS INBETWEEN |
| | TWO DOORS. PLEASE RELOCATE THIS EXIT DOOR TO THE CENTER |
| | OF THE EXIT DOOR TO AVOID CONFUSION WITH THE ADJACENT |
| | DOOR. IF THIS CAN'T BE ACCOMPLISHED, A SIGN WOULD BE |
| | REQUIRED ON THE ADJACENT DOOR INDICATING "THIS IS NOT |
| | AN EXIT". |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW AND PROVIDE REMEDY. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 5) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET |
| | REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE |
| | ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 6) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |