| Date |
Text |
| 2017-03-31 15:00:53 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- REVISED ENERGY CALCULATIONS FORM R405-2014 |
| | SUBMITTED: |
| | A) OWNER DIDN'T CERTIFIED CODE COMPLIANCE AT THE BOTTOM |
| | OF FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | NOTE: IT WAS DONE ON THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL BUT NOT ON |
| | THE REVISED ONE. PERMIT CAN NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT THE |
| | OWNER'S CERTIFICATION. |
| | |
| | B) BUILDER TO COMPLETE THE EPL DISPLAY CARD AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. EPL DISPLAY CARD WAS NOT |
| | COMPLETED BY THE BUILDER. BUILDER NEEDS TO FILL THIS |
| | FORM. SEE EPL DISPLAY CARD IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | PACKAGE. |
| | |
| | C) INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM SUBMITTED IS INCORRECT. |
| | PROVIDE THE CORRECT BUILDER'S NAME. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: BUILDER'S NAME IS INCORRECT AGAIN. |
| | |
| | 2- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION DIDN'T |
| | INCLUDE THE DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. VALUATION WAS UPDATED TO |
| | INCLUDE THE DESIGN FEES OF ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONALS. |
| | VALUATION WAS ROUNDED TO $50,000 +/- TO INCLUDE THE |
| | DESIGN FEES OF ALL ENGINEERS INVOLVED IN THIS PROJECT. |
| | THE PERMIT FEE BALANCE IS $1235.88. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
