| Date |
Text |
| 2018-04-02 17:04:19 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 17010911 (HOTEL FOUNDATION) |
| | ADD: 3200 N. CONGRESS AVE. (ADDRESS TO BE ASSIGNED) |
| | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS |
| | TEL: 561-689-8880 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. SEE THRESHOLD REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 3. SOIL BEARING VALUES; 2014 FBC-B 1803.3 |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE A CURRENT REPORT. |
| | HAVE SEOR INCORPORATE A SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE |
| | UPDATED SOILS REPORT ON THE PLAN, OR PROVIDE A SHOP |
| | DRAWING REVIEW OF THE SOILS REPORT. |
| | 3RD REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES "SEE ATTACHED FROM |
| | UNIVERSAL ENGINEERS." IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS COMMENT |
| | HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. SEE SHEET S0.00, |
| | 310000-FOUNDATIONS, REVISE TO INCORPORATE GEOTECHNICAL |
| | REPORT (CURRENTLY "XXXX"). |
| | 4TH REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | 5TH REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. ALL STRUCTURAL SHEETS WERE |
| | UPLOADED ON 12/20/2017; NO NEW SHEETS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | 4. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| | 5TH REVIEW, THE STRUCTURAL SHEETS ARE NOT DIGITALLY |
| | SIGNED AND SEALED. FS471, UPLOAD DIGITALLY SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED STRUCTURAL SHEETS. |
| | |
| | 5. 2ND REVIEW, SET BACK/ SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING TO PROPERTY LINE(S) AND TO ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINES IS REQUIRED, FBC B 705.3. DEPENDING ON THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINES AND/OR ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINES, INFORMATION REGARDING AFFECTED BUILDINGS OR |
| | PROPOSED BUILDINGS MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED. |
| | PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING, PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE SITE |
| | PLAN WHICH WILL BE REVIEWED NEXT CYCLE INCLUDES NEW |
| | PROPERTY LINES (REPLAT). AS SHEETS WERE NOT CHANGED, |
| | THIS WAS NOT REVIEWED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 5TH REVIEW - NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 6. OK |
| | |
| | 7. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 8. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 9-12. OK |
| | |
| | 13. WHEN RESUBMITTING, A TRANSMITTAL LETTER EXPLAINING |
| | ALL CHANGES IS REQUIRED FBC 107. THIS IS NOT REQUIRED |
| | WHEN CHANGES ARE OBVIOUS. THIS RESUBMITTAL INCLUDES A |
| | NEW SET OF STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS, BUT STRUCTURAL COMMENT |
| | NOT ADDRESSED, AND NO NEW ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS SO IT IS |
| | NOT CLEAR IF ARCHITECT DISAGREES WITH THE COMMENT, |
| | FEELS THE COMMENT WAS ADDRESSED, OR IF SHEETS WERE |
| | INADVERTENTY NOT UPLOADED FOR REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 14. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISOS: |
| | |
| | A. COMPLIANCE WITH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE |
| | 78-123 REQUIRED: MS. SYBILLE WELTER, 561-822-1515, |
| | [email protected]. MS. WELTER WILL ADVISE VIA EMAIL WHEN |
| | THIS IS COMPLETE. |
| | |
| | B. FBC 110.3.7.4.3 SHORING AND RESHORE ENGINEERING TO |
| | BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | FAILURE TO SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING TIMELY |
| | WILL RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. AN ENGINEERED |
| | GUARDRAIL DETAIL (CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS) IS ALSO |
| | REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | C. FBC 105.13 PHASED PERMIT APPROVAL. AFTER SUBMITTAL |
| | OF THE APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATIONS OR ANY OTHER PART OF A |
| | BUILDING OR STRUCTURE BEFORE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | FOR THE WHOLE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. THE HOLDER OF SUCH PERMIT FOR THE FOUNDATION |
| | OR OTHER PARTS OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL PROCEED |
| | AT THE HOLDER?S OWN RISK WITH THE BUILDING OPERATION |
| | AND WITHOUT ASSURANCE THAT A PERMIT FOR THE ENTIRE |
| | STRUCTURE WILL BE GRANTED. CORRECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED |
| | TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TECHNICAL CODES. THIS |
| | PROVISION IS ONLY FOR THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ALL |
| | OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION MUST |
| | BE SECURED PRIOR TO THIS PROVISION BEING APPLIED. |
| | |
| | D. THE LIFE SAFETY SHEETS WERE NOT THOROUGHLY REVIEWED. |
| | THIS WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THE BUILDING PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION; FOUNDATION PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED AT |
| | APPLICANT'S RISK. |
| | |
| | E. ENERGY CALCS WERE NOT THOROUGHLY REVIEWED. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING THE BUILDING, ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: |
| | WATER HEATER COMPLIANCE IS BLANK |
| | NO DOORS SHOWN |
| | CHECK ALL |
| | |
| | 15. NEW COMMENT - FS553, A 4X PLAN REVIEW FEE IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE ASSESSED IF THE SAME PLAN REVIEW COMMENT |
| | HAS BEEN MADE A THIRD TIME. NOTE THAT COMMENT #5 HAS |
| | NOT BEEN ADDRESSED, 5TH REVIEW. WE HAD A MEETING |
| | REGARDING THIS ISSUE. NOTE THAT PLAN REVIEW FEE IS |
| | $6178. |
| | |
| | |
