| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-06 10:54:18 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 17010911 (HOTEL FOUNDATION) |
| | ADD: 3200 N. CONGRESS AVE. (ADDRESS TO BE ASSIGNED) |
| | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS |
| | TEL: 561-689-8880 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST: |
| | |
| | 1. SEE THRESHOLD REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 3. SOIL BEARING VALUES; 2014 FBC-B 1803.3 |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE A CURRENT REPORT. |
| | HAVE SEOR INCORPORATE A SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE |
| | UPDATED SOILS REPORT ON THE PLAN, OR PROVIDE A SHOP |
| | DRAWING REVIEW OF THE SOILS REPORT. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER STATES "SEE ATTACHED FROM |
| | UNIVERSAL ENGINEERS." IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS COMMENT |
| | HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. SEE SHEET S0.00, |
| | 310000-FOUNDATIONS, REVISE TO INCORPORATE GEOTECHNICAL |
| | REPORT (CURRENTLY "XXXX"). |
| | |
| | 4. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5. 2ND REVIEW, SET BACK/ SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING TO PROPERTY LINE(S) AND TO ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINES IS REQUIRED, FBC B 705.3. DEPENDING ON THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINES AND/OR ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINES, INFORMATION REGARDING AFFECTED BUILDINGS OR |
| | PROPOSED BUILDINGS MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | A NOTE ON THE PLANS (A0.0.02) STATES THAT THIS BUILDING |
| | IS OVER 30 FEET FROM OTHER BUILDINGS AND/OR LOT LINES. |
| | IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE THE PROPERTY LINES ARE LOCATED. |
| | DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS NOT CLEAR (FOR INSTANCE - |
| | PROPOSED HOTEL TO BUILDING 11 ON SHEET C2, PROPOSED |
| | HOTEL TO PARKING GARAGE, HOTEL TO CLUBHOUSE), LOCATION |
| | OF ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE(S) NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, RESPONSE LETTER HAS NO RESPONSE FOR THIS |
| | ITEM. IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THIS ITEM HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | FOR INSTANCE - A NOTE ON THE PLAN STATES "EXTERIOR |
| | OPENING PROTECTION: BUILDING SEPARATION >/=20' NO |
| | LIMIT." ALTHOUGH THE NOTE STATES THAT THE BUILDING IS |
| | OVER 30' FROM OTHER BUILDINGS AND/OR LOT LINES, IT IS |
| | NOT CLEAR WHERE THE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE, OR THE |
| | PROPERTY LINE IS LOCATED. SEE ALSO 107.3.5.1.1(1),SET |
| | BACK/SEPARATION (ASSUMED PROPERTY LINES). |
| | |
| | 6. OK |
| | |
| | 7. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 8. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 9. OK |
| | |
| | 10. FS471, FS481, ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS HAVE |
| | REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE A TITLE BLOCK ON EACH SHEET WHICH |
| | INCLUDES THE PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER, COMPANY |
| | LICENSE NUMBER (AS WELL AS OTHER INFORMATION). |
| | |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD HAS A COMPLIANT TITLE |
| | BLOCK ON ALL S SHEETS. HOWEVER, REGARDING THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS, IT NOT CLEAR WHO IS SEALING THESE |
| | SHEETS. THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS LACK A TITLE BLOCK. |
| | THERE IS A BAR WITH ALL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS. |
| | THE ENGINEER'S NAME IS IN THE "SEAL" BLOCK. REVISE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS TO INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED BY FAC61G16, FS481. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW: ENGINEER'S NAME WAS REMOVED FROM THE |
| | SHEETS, ARCHITECT'S NAME DID NOT REPLACE ENGINEER'S |
| | NAME. FOR EXAMPLE, SEE SHEET A0.0.02; THIS SHEET IS |
| | REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED AS IT IS REQUIRED TO |
| | DEMONSTRATE CODE COMPLIANCE. SEE FS481, A TITLE BLOCK |
| | FOR THE ARCHITECT IS REQUIRED, INCLUDING THE |
| | ARCHITECT'S PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER, ARCHITECT |
| | BUSINESS LICENSE NUMBER. THIS COMMENT APPLIES TO OTHER |
| | (POSSIBLY ALL) A SHEETS. |
| | |
| | SEE SHEET A0.0.02; "APPLICABLE CODES" INCLUDES A |
| | REFERENCE TO THE BROWARD COUNTY AMENDMENTS TO THE FFPC, |
| | REVISE. |
| | |
| | THRESHOLD STATEMENT FOR A SHEETS LACK A REFERENCE TO |
| | THE BUILDING CODE; REVISE. |
| | |
| | 11. OK |
| | |
| | 12. FROM FIRST REVIEW: IF CIVIL SHEETS ARE USED TO SHOW |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, THE ADVANCED |
| | BUILDING CODE COURSE IS REQUIRED FOR THE ENGINEER, |
| | FS471.0195. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT CLEAR IF THIS IS REQUIRED AS COMMENT #5 |
| | WAS NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | FROM FIRST REVIEW: THE DBPR WEBSITE |
| | (WWW.MYFLORIDALICENSE.COM) DOES NOT SHOW THAT JORGE |
| | REYES, PE HAS TAKEN THE ADVANCED BUILDING CODE COURSE, |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT CLEAR HOW THIS WAS ADDRESSED. AN EMAIL |
| | WAS SENT TO MR. REYES ON 6/6. |
| | |
| | 13. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISOS: |
| | |
| | A. COMPLIANCE WITH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE |
| | 78-123 REQUIRED: MS. SYBILLE WELTER, 561-822-1515, |
| | [email protected]. MS. WELTER WILL ADVISE VIA EMAIL WHEN |
| | THIS IS COMPLETE. |
| | |
| | B. FBC 110.3.7.4.3 SHORING AND RESHORE ENGINEERING TO |
| | BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | FAILURE TO SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING TIMELY |
| | WILL RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. AN ENGINEERED |
| | GUARDRAIL DETAIL (CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS) IS ALSO |
| | REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | C. FBC 105.13 PHASED PERMIT APPROVAL. AFTER SUBMITTAL |
| | OF THE APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATIONS OR ANY OTHER PART OF A |
| | BUILDING OR STRUCTURE BEFORE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | FOR THE WHOLE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. THE HOLDER OF SUCH PERMIT FOR THE FOUNDATION |
| | OR OTHER PARTS OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL PROCEED |
| | AT THE HOLDER?S OWN RISK WITH THE BUILDING OPERATION |
| | AND WITHOUT ASSURANCE THAT A PERMIT FOR THE ENTIRE |
| | STRUCTURE WILL BE GRANTED. CORRECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED |
| | TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TECHNICAL CODES. THIS |
| | PROVISION IS ONLY FOR THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ALL |
| | OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION MUST |
| | BE SECURED PRIOR TO THIS PROVISION BEING APPLIED. |
| | |
| | D. THE LIFE SAFETY SHEETS WERE NOT THOROUGHLY REVIEWED. |
| | THIS WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THE BUILDING PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION; FOUNDATION PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED AT |
| | APPLICANT'S RISK. |
| | |
| | E. ENERGY CALCS WERE NOT THOROUGHLY REVIEWED. WHEN |
| | RESUBMITTING THE BUILDING, ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING: |
| | WATER HEATER COMPLIANCE IS BLANK |
| | NO DOORS SHOWN |
| | CHECK ALL |
| | |
