| Date |
Text |
| 2017-04-13 09:24:54 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | W. P. B. PERMIT: 17010911 (HOTEL FOUNDATION) |
| | ADD: 3200 N. CONGRESS AVE. (ADDRESS TO BE ASSIGNED) |
| | CONT: HEDRICK BROTHERS |
| | TEL: 561-689-8880 |
| | E-MAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | FROM PREVIOUS LIST (RENUMBERED): |
| | |
| | 1. 109.3.6.1 THRESHOLD INSPECTION PLAN. THE ENFORCING |
| | AGENCY SHALL REQUIRE A (WRITTEN/ TYPED) SPECIAL |
| | INSPECTOR TO PERFORM STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS ON A |
| | THRESHOLD BUILDING PURSUANT TO A STRUCTURAL INSPECTION |
| | PLAN PREPARED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THE STRUCTURAL |
| | INSPECTION PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENFORCING |
| | AGENCY PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT FOR |
| | THE CONSTRUCTION OF A THRESHOLD BUILDING. THE PURPOSE |
| | OF THE STRUCTURAL INSPECTION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE |
| | SPECIFIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES SO THAT |
| | THE BUILDING CAN BE ADEQUATELY INSPECTED FOR COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH THE PERMITTED DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, UNABLE TO LOCATE. |
| | |
| | 2. THRESHOLD BLDG., REQUIRED STATEMENT: FS553.79(7)(D), |
| | W.P.B. AMENDMENT 110.3.7.4.4 ALL PLANS FOR THE BUILDING |
| | WHICH ARE REQUIRED TO BE SIGNED AND SEALED BY THE |
| | ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER OF RECORD CONTAIN A STATEMENT |
| | THAT, TO THE BEST OF THE ARCHITECT?S OR ENGINEER?S |
| | KNOWLEDGE, THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS COMPLY WITH THE |
| | APPLICABLE MINIMUM BUILDING CODES AND THE APPLICABLE |
| | FIRESAFETY STANDARDS AS DETERMINED BY THE LOCAL |
| | AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS CHAPTER AND CHAPTER |
| | 633. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE THIS STATEMENT ON |
| | THE ENGINEER'S PLANS. |
| | STATEMENT WAS ON AN A SHEET BUT NOT CLEAR WHO IS |
| | SIGNING THAT SHEET (SEE OTHER COMMENT REGARDING TITLE |
| | BLOCK), STATEMENT NOT CONSISTENT WITH FLORIDA STATUTE |
| | (LACKS REFERENCE TO BUILDING CODES). |
| | |
| | SEE ALSO THRESHOLD REVIEW FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS |
| | (SI AGREEMENT, RESUMES, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 3. SOIL BEARING VALUES. THE TEST BY UNIVERSAL |
| | ENGINEERING SCIENCES REFERENCES THE TEST IS PRELIMINARY |
| | GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT BANYAN CAY- HOTEL |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE BORING SAMPLES TAKEN CH-1 AND CH-2 ARE |
| | SHOWN FOR THE CLUBHOUSE, THIS SOILS REPORT HAS NO |
| | BORINGS SHOWN IN THE REPORT FOR THE HOTEL. NOTE FOR THE |
| | TENNIS CLUB CENTER UP TO 6 FEET OF MUCK WAS ENCOUNTERED |
| | WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. PLEASE COMPLY WITH: 2014 |
| | FBC-B 1803.3 BASIS OF INVESTIGATION. |
| | SOIL CLASSIFICATION SHALL BE BASED ON OBSERVATION AND |
| | ANY NECESSARY TESTS OF THE MATERIALS DISCLOSED BY |
| | BORINGS, TEST PITS OR OTHER SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION MADE |
| | IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS. ADDITIONAL STUDIES SHALL BE |
| | MADE AS NECESSARY TO EVALUATE SLOPE STABILITY, SOIL |
| | STRENGTH, POSITION AND ADEQUACY OF LOAD-BEARING SOILS, |
| | THE EFFECT OF MOISTURE VARIATION ON SOIL-BEARING |
| | CAPACITY, COMPRESSIBILITY, LIQUEFACTION AND |
| | EXPANSIVENESS. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE A CURRENT REPORT. |
| | HAVE SEOR INCORPORATE A SPECIFIC REFERENCE TO THE |
| | UPDATED SOILS REPORT ON THE PLAN, OR PROVIDE A SHOP |
| | DRAWING REVIEW OF THE SOILS REPORT. |
| | |
| | 4. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 5. 2ND REVIEW, SET BACK/ SEPARATION FROM PROPOSED |
| | BUILDING TO PROPERTY LINE(S) AND TO ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINES IS REQUIRED, FBC B 705.3. DEPENDING ON THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINES AND/OR ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINES, INFORMATION REGARDING AFFECTED BUILDINGS OR |
| | PROPOSED BUILDINGS MAY ALSO BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | A NOTE ON THE PLANS STATES THAT THIS BUILDING IS OVER |
| | 30 FEET FROM OTHER BUILDINGS AND/OR LOT LINES. IT IS |
| | NOT CLEAR WHERE THE PROPERTY LINES ARE LOCATED. |
| | DISTANCE BETWEEN BUILDINGS NOT CLEAR (FOR INSTANCE - |
| | PROPOSED HOTEL TO BUILDING 11 ON SHEET C2, PROPOSED |
| | HOTEL TO PARKING GARAGE, HOTEL TO CLUBHOUSE), LOCATION |
| | OF ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE(S) NOT CLEAR. |
| | |
| | 6. FROM PREVIOUS LIST: SHEET 019-S-4.06 THE PLANS |
| | INDICATE PRESSURES FOR THE ROOF ZONES 1-3 AND OVERHANGS |
| | ZONES 6&7. PRESSURES APPEAR TO BE LOW, UNKNOWNS, SLOPE |
| | AND MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. TABLE 1609.7(2) ADJUSTMENT |
| | FACTORS FOR HEIGHT & EXPOSURE. PROVIDE THE MEAN ROOF |
| | HEIGHT FOR THE BUILDING. THE SAME ISSUE FOR THE WINDOW |
| | AND DOOR SIZES AND ASSOCIATED PRESSURES (ZONES 4 & 5). |
| | |
| | COMMENT NOT ENTIRELY ADDRESSED. SLOPE WAS PROVIDED AS |
| | 4:12 MANSARD. THE ROOF PLAN ON S4.06 APPEARS TO SHOW |
| | BOTH PITCHED ROOF AND FLAT ROOF AREAS. THE C&C WIND |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES ON THE TWO CHARTS ARE TOO LOW, EVEN |
| | FOR THE PITCHED ROOFS. ENGINEER'S INTENT NOT CLEAR; ARE |
| | ALL ROOFS C&C TO MEET THE SAME DESIGN PRESSURES FOR |
| | FLAT, MANSARD, AND PITCHED? IF THIS IS THE CASE, C&C |
| | ROOF PRESSURES TO BE "WORST CASE" CRITERIA (FLAT). |
| | |
| | SOME OF THE WALL C&C DESIGN PRESSURES SPECIFIED ALSO |
| | APPEAR TOO LOW (SEE 1ST REVIEW). EITHER CORRECT DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES OR INCORPORATE THE CALCULATIONS FOR THE C&C |
| | DPS INTO THE PLAN. IF THE PRESSURES ARE NOT INCREASED, |
| | SEND THE CALCULATIONS VIA EMAIL PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL |
| | FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW. IF THE PRESSURES ARE REVISED TO |
| | BE CONSISTENT WITH THE TABLES IN FBC CHAPTER 16 OR |
| | ASCE7-10, CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7. SEE SIGNATURE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 8. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 9. S0.01, A LINE OF TEXT (BETWEEN LINTELS AND ROOF |
| | DECK) IS NOT LEGIBLE, FBC 107, PROVIDE LEGIBLE TEXT. |
| | |
| | 10. FS471, FS481, ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS HAVE |
| | REQUIREMENTS TO HAVE A TITLE BLOCK ON EACH SHEET WHICH |
| | INCLUDES THE PRINTED NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER, COMPANY |
| | LICENSE NUMBER (AS WELL AS OTHER INFORMATION). |
| | |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER OF RECORD HAS A COMPLIANT TITLE |
| | BLOCK ON ALL S SHEETS. HOWEVER, REGARDING THE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS, IT NOT CLEAR WHO IS SEALING THESE |
| | SHEETS. THE ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS LACK A TITLE BLOCK. |
| | THERE IS A BAR WITH ALL OF THE DESIGN PROFESSIONALS. |
| | THE ENGINEER'S NAME IS IN THE "SEAL" BLOCK. REVISE |
| | ARCHITECTURAL SHEETS TO INCLUDE ALL INFORMATION |
| | REQUIRED BY FAC61G16, FS481. |
| | |
| | 11. CIVIL SHEETS USE NGVD29 VERTICAL DATUM. A0.0.02 |
| | PROPOSES A FINISHED FLOOR OF 22'0' NAVD88. THERE IS A |
| | CONFLICT OF APPROXIMATELY 18"; REVISE TO BE CONSISTENT. |
| | NGVD29 IS RECOMMENDED AT THIS TIME. |
| | |
| | 12. IF CIVIL SHEETS ARE USED TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, THE ADVANCED BUILDING CODE |
| | COURSE IS REQUIRED FOR THE ENGINEER, FS471.0195. |
| | |
| | THE DBPR WEBSITE (WWW.MYFLORIDALICENSE.COM) DOES NOT |
| | SHOW THAT JORGE REYES, PE HAS TAKEN THE ADVANCED |
| | BUILDING CODE COURSE, PLEASE ADDRESS. |
| | |
| | 13. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISOS: |
| | |
| | A. COMPLIANCE WITH ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE |
| | 78-123 REQUIRED: MS. SYBILLE WELTER, 561-822-1515, |
| | [email protected]. MS. WELTER WILL ADVISE VIA EMAIL WHEN |
| | THIS IS COMPLETE. |
| | |
| | B. FBC 110.3.7.4.3 SHORING AND RESHORE ENGINEERING TO |
| | BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | FAILURE TO SUBMIT SHORING/RESHORE ENGINEERING TIMELY |
| | WILL RESULT IN A STOP WORK ORDER. AN ENGINEERED |
| | GUARDRAIL DETAIL (CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS) IS ALSO |
| | REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | C. FBC 105.13 PHASED PERMIT APPROVAL. AFTER SUBMITTAL |
| | OF THE APPROPRIATE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, THE BUILDING |
| | OFFICIAL IS AUTHORIZED TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THE |
| | CONSTRUCTION OF FOUNDATIONS OR ANY OTHER PART OF A |
| | BUILDING OR STRUCTURE BEFORE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS |
| | FOR THE WHOLE BUILDING OR STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN |
| | SUBMITTED. THE HOLDER OF SUCH PERMIT FOR THE FOUNDATION |
| | OR OTHER PARTS OF A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE SHALL PROCEED |
| | AT THE HOLDER?S OWN RISK WITH THE BUILDING OPERATION |
| | AND WITHOUT ASSURANCE THAT A PERMIT FOR THE ENTIRE |
| | STRUCTURE WILL BE GRANTED. CORRECTIONS MAY BE REQUIRED |
| | TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE TECHNICAL CODES. THIS |
| | PROVISION IS ONLY FOR THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, ALL |
| | OTHER AGENCY APPROVALS NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION MUST |
| | BE SECURED PRIOR TO THIS PROVISION BEING APPLIED. |
| | |
| | D. THE LIFE SAFETY SHEETS WERE NOT THOROUGHLY REVIEWED. |
| | THIS WILL BE REVIEWED UNDER THE BUILDING PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION; FOUNDATION PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED AT |
| | APPLICANT'S RISK. |
| | |
