| Date |
Text |
| 2017-02-02 14:12:41 | FAILED |
| | |
| | PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES. |
| | |
| | 1) THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION OF THE WALL AND FENCES |
| | CHANGES THE APPROVED SITE PLAN AND THUS REQUIRES THE |
| | APPROVAL OF A MINOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PRIOR |
| | TO THE APPROVAL OF THIS PERMIT APPLICATION BY ZONING. |
| | PLEASE SUBMIT AN APPLICATION TO THE CITY'S PLANNING |
| | DIVISION. |
| | |
| | 2) THERE IS A PLANTING BED TO THE SOUTH OF THE BACKFLOW |
| | PREVENTER, WHICH APPEARS TO BE IN DIRECT CONFLICT WITH |
| | THE PROPOSED WALL LOCATION. YOU MAY NOT REDUCE THE |
| | AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE ON THE SITE. PROVIDE HOW THE |
| | LANDSCAPE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND MATERIAL WILL BE |
| | PRESERVED. |
| | |
| | 3) FLOOR PLAN KEY NOTE 5 ON SHEET A1.1 CALLS OUT AN 8 |
| | FOOT CMU WALL; HOWEVER, THE WALL IS SHOWN AT 6 FEET IN |
| | HEIGHT ON SHEET A1.2. |
| | |
| | 4) THE PROPOSED CMU WALL (AT EITHER SIX OR EIGHT FEET) |
| | WILL BLOCK THE REQUIRED PEDESTRIAN AHEAD SIGN. PROVIDE |
| | HOW THIS WARNING NOTICE WILL BE RETAINED IN A LOCATION |
| | WHICH NOTIFIES DRIVERS OF THE UPCOMING PEDESTRIAN |
| | WALKWAY AND CROSSING? |
| | |
| | 5) THE PROPOSED CMU WALL WILL OBSTRUCT DRIVERS FROM |
| | SEEING PEOPLE EXITING THE STAIRWELL IN THE CASE OF A |
| | EMERGENCY. |
| | |
| | 6) THE NEW CYPRESS WOOD SCREEN WALL WILL CREATE AN |
| | UNSAFE SITUATION BETWEEN VEHICLES ENTERING THE SITE AND |
| | THOSE EXITING THE LOADING BAYS BY BLOCKING THE |
| | VISIBILITY AT THE INTERSECTION. |
| | |
| | 7) DRAWING L5 ON SHEET A1.2 SHOWS VALET ENTRANCES ON |
| | EITHER SIDE OF THE WALL THAT IS BEING TREATED WITH THE |
| | VENEER PANELS. PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS NOTE. |
| | |
| | CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| 2017-01-26 14:15:07 | ROUTED TO ERIC SCHNEIDER |
