| Date |
Text |
| 2017-05-17 18:47:17 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ALTERATION, FOURTH BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | I TRY TO APPROVE PLANS WITH PROVISO WHEN THERE ARE |
| | PENDING ITEMS THAT CAN BE SUBMITTED LATER AFTER THE |
| | PERMIT IS ISSUED BUT IN THIS CASE I CAN NOT ISSUE THE |
| | PERMIT WITH THE PROVISO BECAUSE THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS |
| | NEED TO BE MET. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | ARCHITECT TO PAY FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) FOR MULTIPLE |
| | PLAN REVIEW REJECTIONS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- SIZE OF WINDOWS SPECIFIED FOR BEDROOM #3 DON'T SEEM |
| | TO COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. R310 |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). REVISE SIZE OF |
| | WINDOWS OR PROVIDE PROOF THAT SPECIFIED SIZE WILL |
| | COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES "EGRESS REQUIREMENTS ARE 20"X24" MINIMUM + |
| | MINIMUM 5.7 SF. THE OPENING SIZE IS 23 1/2" X 48" |
| | OPENING (WITH 7.6 SF OPENING) ALL SIZES LABELED ON THE |
| | WINDOW SCHEDULE (NO CHANGE TO DRAWINGS). |
| | NONE OF THE SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS SPECIFIED ON THE WINDOW |
| | SCHEDULE COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. |
| | R310 FBC-RESIDENTIAL, 5TH EDITION (2014). SEC. R310.1.2 |
| | REQUIRES A MIN. OPENING HEIGHT OF 24 INCHES. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO COMPLY. |
| | ARCHITECT TO PAY FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) FOR MULTIPLE |
| | PLAN REVIEW REJECTIONS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- PLANS WERE REVISED AND NOW THEY SHOW REPLACEMENT OF |
| | ALL EXISTING WINDOWS AND DOORS. CLEARLY SPECIFY TYPE |
| | AND SIZE OF EXISTING BEDROOM WINDOWS TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS OF SEC. 704 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES THAT " ALL EGRESS WINDOWS ARE LABELED AS SUCH ON |
| | THE SCHEDULE & THE ELEVATIONS (NO CHANGE TO DRAWINGS). |
| | EGRESS WINDOWS INDICATED ON THE WINDOW SCHEDULE DON'T |
| | COMPLY WITH EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. NEED WINDOWS THAT |
| | COMPLY WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS (COORDINATE WITH |
| | ITEM #1 ABOVE) OR NEED TO PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION |
| | SHOWING THAT THE PROPOSED WINDOWS FOR EXISTING BEDROOMS |
| | WILL COMPLY AT LEAST WITH WITH THE EXCEPTION OF SEC 704 |
| | OF THE EXISTING BUILDING CODE. |
| | ARCHITECT TO PAY FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) FOR MULTIPLE |
| | PLAN REVIEW REJECTIONS. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | EXISTING GARAGE EXTERIOR WALLS AND CEILING SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE INSULATION REQUIREMENTS SHOWN ON |
| | THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. ARCHITECT'S RESPONSE LETTER |
| | STATES THAT "INSULATION CALLED OUT ON THE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS COVER SHEET (NEW 9" FIBERGLASS R=30). |
| | SPECIFICATIONS ON THE COVER SHEET ARE MISSING THE |
| | SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE INSULATION ON THE GARAGE DOORS. |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION. COORDINATE WITH THE THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED. |
| | ARCHITECT TO PAY FOUR TIMES THE PLAN REVIEW FEE AS |
| | REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) FOR MULTIPLE |
| | PLAN REVIEW REJECTIONS. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) NEW COMMENT BASED ON ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND |
| | ARCHITECT'S REVISIONS FOR ROOF VENTILATION. NEED |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR NEW ROOF VENTS AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. NOTE: MAKE SURE VENTS ARE DESIGNED FOR CONCRETE |
| | ROOF TILE. |
| | |
| | B) ORIGINAL COMMENT: CONCRETE ROOF TILE. ONLY ONE COPY |
| | WAS SUBMITTED. NEED TO PROVIDE 2 COPIES. |
| | RESPONSE: THE COVER PAGE AND THE REST OF THE PAGES OF |
| | THE SECOND COPY SUBMITTED DON'T MATCH. OVER PAGE |
| | SUBMITTED IS FOR NOA 16-0711.05 BUT THE FOLLOWING PAGE |
| | ARE FOR NOA 12-0222.03. PROVIDE COMPLETE AND CORRECT |
| | NOA'S (2 COPIES). |
| | |
| | C) ORIGINAL COMMENT: ROOF TILE ADHESIVE AS SPECIFIED BY |
| | THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD ON COVER PAGE OF NOA SUBMITTED. |
| | SEE NOA FOR LISTED ADHESIVES. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | 5- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | PLANS WILL NEED TO BE SEND FOR HISTORIC REVIEW ONCE THE |
| | EGRESS WINDOWS ARE REVISED ON PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ****PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
