| Date |
Text |
| 2017-04-06 12:14:45 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1. SCOPE NOT CLEAR. THE APPLICATION IS TO "MODIFY |
| | EXISTING PARKING LOT WITH NEW PAVEMENT, CONCRETE, |
| | HARDSCAPE, STRIPING & SIGNAGE." AN 11X17 PAGE WITH |
| | COLORED HATCH MARKS WAS PROVIDED - ALL CURBS, ISLANDS, |
| | EXTERIOR SIGNAGE (TRAFFIC), SIDEWALKS, PAVEERS, AND |
| | STRIPING". VALUE ON APPLICATION IS $4,880. |
| | |
| | FBC 109, PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB. |
| | THIS SHOULD BE ITEMIZED AND INCLUDE SQUARE FOOT AREAS. |
| | THE VALUE OF PREVIOUSLY ISSUED RELATED BUILDING PERMITS |
| | DID NOT INCLUDE THE WORK PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | PLANS SUBMITTED ARE CIVIL PAGES WHICH INCLUDE DRAINAGE |
| | AND OTHER INFORMATION WHICH DO NOT APPEAR TO BE |
| | INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF THIS APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | FBC 107, PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH SHOWS SCOPE AND NATURE OF |
| | WORK. |
| | |
| | 2. STRIPING OF THE EXISTING SURFACE PARKING LOT APPEARS |
| | TO BE INCLUDED IN THE SCOPE OF THIS APPLICATION. FOR |
| | RE-STRIPE PERMITS, THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS |
| | REQUIRED: |
| | |
| | A. A PLAN WHICH SHOWS THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES |
| | NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES |
| | LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCES |
| | LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ACCESS AISLES |
| | SHOW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM PUBLIC WAY |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM ACCESSIBLE SPACE TO ACCESSIBLE |
| | ENTRANCE |
| | |
| | SEE FBC 2014 ACCESSIBLITY 202.3 (ALTERATIONS), 208.2 |
| | (PARKING SPACES), 502 (PARKING SPACES), 206 (ACCESSIBLE |
| | ROUTE). |
| | |
| | YOU MAY FIND THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT USEFUL, |
| | PARTICULARLY THE INTRODUCTION: "WHEN A BUSINESS |
| | RESTRIPES A PARKING LOT, IT MUST PROVIDE ACCESSIBLE |
| | PARKING SPACES AS REQUIRED BY THE ADA STANDARDS FOR |
| | ACCESSIBLE DESIGN." |
| | |
| | HTTP://WWW.ADA.GOV/RESTRIPE.HTM |
| | |
| | B. FBC 2014 ACCESSIBILITY ADVISORY 502.3, WHERE THE |
| | ACCESSIBLE ROUTE MUST CROSS VEHICULAR TRAFFIC LANES, |
| | MARKED CROSSINGS ENHANCE PEDESTRIAN SAFETY; PLEASE |
| | INDICATE LOCATION ON PLAN. |
| | |
| | C. FOR ANY PLANS WHICH ARE NOT PREPARED BY A DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL (AND THEREFORE SIGNED AND SEALED), THE |
| | INDIVIDUAL TAKING RESPONSIBILITY SHALL PROVIDE THEIR |
| | PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE ON THE PLAN, FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 3. FBC 107, WHEN RESUBMITTING APPLICANT IS TO PREPARE |
| | TWO IDENTICAL COLLATED SETS OF PERMIT DOCUMENTS FOR |
| | PERMIT ISSUANCE. |
| | |
| | OLD SHEETS ARE TO BE RETAINED IN THE SUBMITTAL, REMOVED |
| | FROM THE TWO PERMIT ISSUE SETS, AND THOSE DOCUMENTS |
| | SHOULD BE MARKED "VOID" OR "OLD SHEETS". |
| | |
| | THE TWO COLLATED PERMIT SETS ARE TO INCLUDE ANY |
| | DOCUMENTS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED AS WELL AS |
| | THE NEW DOCUMENTS WHICH SHOULD ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | ALL OLD VOIDED SHEETS SHOULD BE MARKED "VOID" AND |
| | RETAINED IN THE SUBMITTAL. IT IS STRONGLY RECOMMENDED |
| | THAT ALL VOIDED SHEETS BE RETAINED - DO NOT DISCARD |
| | VOIDED SHEETS TO LEAVE ONLY ONE COPY OF EACH VOIDED |
| | PAGE. FAILURE TO RETAIN ALL DOCUMENTS IN THE SUBMITTAL |
| | PACKAGE MAY RESULT IN PLAN REVIEW DELAYS. |
| | |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER STATING HOW EACH ITEM WAS ADDRESSED |
| | WILL HELP TO EXPEDITE YOUR PLAN REVIEW. |
| | |
| | DO NOT REMOVE ANY SHEETS FROM THE PACKAGE. THIS |
| | PREVIOUSLY PASSED BUILDING, BUT THERE ARE NO PLANS |
| | STAMPED BY BUILDING SO IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT WAS |
| | REVIEWED AND APPROVED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
