| Date |
Text |
| 2017-01-04 19:00:26 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN 600 FEET OF THE INLAND |
| | WATERWAY. THEREFORE, IT IS EXPOSURE CATEGORY D RATHER |
| | THAN C. FBC-R301.2.1.4.3 NOTE: THE EXTERIOR DOOR AND |
| | WINDOW PRESSURES WILL NEED TO BE REVISED FOR EXPOSURE |
| | D. |
| | |
| | 2) SPECIFY ON THE PLANS THAT THIS IS A LEVEL 2 |
| | ALTERATION PER FBC EXISTING BUILDING SECTION 504. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PLANS REFERENCE THE 2010 EDITION OF THE FLORIDA |
| | PLUMBING CODE ON SHEET A.01. THE 2014 IS THE EDITION |
| | THAT WOULD APPLY. |
| | |
| | 4) SPECIFY THE SIZE OF THE POWDER ROOM DOOR ON THE |
| | PLANS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) ON SHEET S.01 UNDER STRUCTURAL DESIGN CRITERIA, THE |
| | PARAPET HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE IS SPECIFIED AS 50 FEET. THE |
| | ELEVATIONS ON THE PLANS SHOW A TWO STOREY BUILDING WITH |
| | A SLOPED ROOF. THE MEAN ROOF HEIGHT (THE DISTANCE FROM |
| | GRADE TO THE AVERAGE OF THE ROOF EAVE HEIGHT AND THE |
| | HEIGHT TO THE HIGHEST POINT ON THE ROOF SURFACE) WHICH |
| | IS USED TO DETERMINE THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING |
| | PRESSURES LOOKS TO BE AROUND 21 FEET. FBC-R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) THE EXTERIOR DOOR AND WINDOW PRESSURES ARE |
| | INCORRECT. THE POSITIVE PRESSURES WILL ALWAYS BE LESS |
| | THAN THE NEGATIVE PRESSURES. THIS BUILDING LOCATED IN |
| | EXPOSURE D WITH A 25 FT. MRH WILL HAVE WORST CASE |
| | PRESSURES OF +50.4, -67.5 PSF FOR A 10SQFT AREA IN WALL |
| | ZONE 5 (CORNERS). FBC-R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DBPR RULE |
| | 61G20-3.001 THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING |
| | INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES |
| | FOR THE METAL ROOFING MATERIALS AND NEW EXTERIOR DOOR. |
| | |
| | 8) THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS WERE NOT REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN |
| | WRITING BY THE DESIGNER OF RECORD. FBC 107.3.4 |
| | |
| | 9) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT A |
| | RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
