| Date |
Text |
| 2017-01-26 11:01:01 | 2ND REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #16120091 |
| | 1/26/17 |
| | |
| | MANY OF THE 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS STILL EXIST OR HAVE NOT |
| | BEEN ADDRESSED ENTIRELY. PLEASE NOTE THAT A 4X PLAN |
| | REVIEW FEE MAY APPLY IF THE PLAN IS DISAPPROVED A THIRD |
| | TIME FOR THE SAME CODE VIOLATIONS- SECTION 553.80 |
| | FLORIDA STATUTES. |
| | |
| | 1) 2ND REQUEST FOR AC COOLING AND HEATING CALCULATIONS |
| | (1ST REVIEW COMMENT #2). |
| | |
| | 2) 2ND REQUEST FOR DOCUMENTATION OF FLORIDA ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION CODE COMPLIANCE (COMMENT #3). |
| | |
| | 3) 2ND REQUEST FOR COMPLIANT O/A CALCULATIONS. PLEASE |
| | SEE SHEET1.4A AND ADJUST THE BREWERY AREA CALCULATION |
| | USING THE 14 PERSON OCCUPANT LOAD (COMMENT #4). |
| | |
| | 3A) THE CORRECTED O/A CALCULATION FOR AHU-1 INDICATES |
| | THAT AN ERV IS REQUIRED FOR THE SYSTEM- SEE SECTION AND |
| | TABLE C403.2.6 FBC-14 ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 4) 2ND REQUEST TO HOW THE C02 SENSOR AND LABEL THE AHU |
| | ON SHEET 3.3M (COMMENTS # 5 & 11). |
| | |
| | 5) 2ND REQUEST FOR THE BOILER EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE TO BE |
| | PLACED ON THE PLAN- PLEASE NOTE THE SUBMITTED CUT |
| | SHEETS SHOW MULTIPLE MODELS OF VARYING CAPACITIES |
| | (COMMENT #7). |
| | |
| | 6) 2ND REQUEST FOR COMPLIANT COMBUSTION AIR DUCT |
| | DRAWINGS. PLEASE SEE SECTION 304.11(4) DBC-14 FUEL GAS: |
| | SEPARATE DUCTS ARE REQUIRED IF USING THE TWO-OPENING |
| | METHOD IN THE BOILER ROOM (COMMENT #9). |
| | |
| | 7) 2ND REQUEST FOR A EXHAUST VENTILATION CALCULATION |
| | FOR EF-2 (COMMENT #13). |
| | |
| | 8) 2ND REQUEST FOR AN EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE FOR THE NEW |
| | O/A MOTORIZED DAMPER- SEE C402.4.5.2 (COMMENT #14). |
| | |
| | 9) 2ND REQUEST FOR MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS OR |
| | "CUT SHEETS" FOR THE BREWERY TANKS AND KETTLES (COMMENT |
| | #16). |
| | |
| | 10) 2ND REQUEST TO ENLAREGE THE PRINT UNDER THE TANKS |
| | ON SHEET 1.5A ( COMMENT #17). |
| | |
| | 11) 2ND REQUEST TO [PROVIDE WORKING CLEARANCE |
| | DIMENSIONS AROUND THE TANKS AND KETTLES ( COMMENT #18). |
| | |
| | 12) 2ND REQUEST TO PROVIDE CODE-COMPLIANT GUARDS AT THE |
| | ROOF EDGES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REVISED PLAN SHOWS 36" |
| | HIGH GUARDS HOWEVER 42" GUARDS ARE REQUIRED PER SECTION |
| | 304.11- PLEASE CORRECT (COMMENT #22). |
| | |
| | 13) 2ND REQUEST FOR THE WIND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR |
| | ROOFTOP MECHANICAL INSTALLATIONS. PLEASE PLACE THE |
| | CRITERIA ( COMMENT #23). |
| | |
| | 14) 2ND REQUEST FOR THE ROOF STAND NOA (COMMENT #23). |
| | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ROOF STAND DOCUMENT SUBMITTED IS |
| | NOT VALID UNLESS IT IS AN APPROVED MIAMI-DADE NOA OR |
| | FL. PRODUCT APPROVAL. NO COVER SHEET WAS SUBMITTED TO |
| | VALIDATE THE DOCUMENT, AND THE SHEETS ALL HAVE COPIED |
| | ENGINEER'S SIGNATURES AND SEALS. THE CORRECT SUBMITTAL |
| | MUST ALSO BE MARKED UP BY THE EOR AS PREVIOUSLY |
| | REQUESTED. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
