| Date |
Text |
| 2017-03-28 15:56:47 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1-2. OK |
| | |
| | 3. FROM PREVIOUS LIST: KAYKAN SOFFIT PRODUCT APPROVAL, |
| | INDICATE WHICH PRODUCT AND INSTALLATION METHOD IS |
| | PROPOSED (DRAWING PAGE 1 OF 15). |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THE DOCUMENT SUBMITTED IS NOT A PART OF THE |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL. IT APPEARS TO BE AN EVALUATION REPORT |
| | BUT DOES NOT INCLUDE A PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER. ONE |
| | ITEM IS CIRCLED, 20' MRH, BUT THE APARTMENT BUILDINGS |
| | ARE FOUR STORIES. |
| | |
| | THIS ITEM CAN BE A PROVISO UPON REQUEST - PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION, SUBMIT PRODUCT APPROVAL WITH INSTALLATION |
| | METHOD INDICATED. |
| | |
| | 4. OK |
| | |
| | 5. WHEN AVAILABLE, PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR |
| | THIS JOB, FBC 105. |
| | |
| | 6. TEST REPORTS FOR THE FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT WERE NOT |
| | PROVIDED. "BRAVO UNDERLAYMENT" SPEC SHEET WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | PROVIDE TEST REPORTS FOR THE FLOORING UNDERLAYMENT |
| | ACOUSTIC INSULATION: |
| | |
| | A. FBC B 1207.2, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES SEPARATING |
| | DWELLING UNITS FROM EACH OTHER OR FROM PUBLIC OR |
| | SERVICE AREAS SHALL HAVE A SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS |
| | (STC) OF NOT LESS THAN 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) FOR AIR |
| | BORNE NOISE WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 90. |
| | IF A SUSPENDED CEILING WAS USED AS A PART OF THE TEST, |
| | PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO HOW IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED |
| | THAT THIS CONDITION CURRENTLY EXISTS AND HOW IT CAN BE |
| | GUARANTEED THAT THE CONDITIONS IN THE UNIT BELOW WILL |
| | NOT BE ALTERED. |
| | |
| | B. FBC B 1207.3, FLOOR/CEILING ASSEMBLIES BETWEEN |
| | DWELLING UNITS OR BETWEEN A DWELLING UNIT AND A PUBLIC |
| | OR SERVICE AREA WITHIN THE STRUCTURE SHALL HAVE AN |
| | IMPACT INSULATION CLASS (IIC) RATING OF NOT LESS THAN |
| | 50 (45 IF FIELD TESTED) WHEN TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH |
| | ASTM E 492. IF A SUSPENDED CEILING WAS USED AS A PART |
| | OF THE TEST, PROVIDE INFORMATION AS TO HOW IT HAS BEEN |
| | DETERMINED THAT THIS CONDITION CURRENTLY EXISTS AND HOW |
| | IT CAN BE GUARANTEED THAT THE CONDITIONS IN THE UNIT |
| | BELOW WILL NOT BE ALTERED. |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TEST REPORT. |
| | |
| | C. FBC B 720.2 OR 603.1, PROVIDE TEST DATA IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM E 84 OR UL 723 (FLAME SPREAD). |
| | |
| | 7. BUILDING TYPE (SHEET G0.1) IS IIIB. REVISE PLAN TO |
| | INCLUDE THE FLOOR CEILING ASSEMBLY; THIS INFORMATION IS |
| | REQUIRED TO DETERMINE COMPLIANCE FOR THE FLOORING |
| | UNDERLAYMENT SELECTED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THAT THIS IS HOLLOW CORE PLANK, |
| | BUT THE PLAN WAS NOT REVISED. THIS CAN BE A PROVISO |
| | ITEM UPON REQUEST. RESPONSE LETTERS ARE HELPFUL FOR |
| | REVIEW BUT NOT SIGNED AND SEALED, ARE NOT RETAINED, ARE |
| | NOT A PART OF THE PERMIT RECORD. |
| | |
| | 8-10. OK |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | |
| | 11. FIRE RATED WINDOWS ARE SPECIFIED. THIS PERMIT WILL |
| | BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE WINDOW |
| | AND IMPACT PROTECTION TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION. INSTALLATION METHOD TO BE MARKED ON THE |
| | IMPACT PROTECTION PRODUCT APPROVAL. A SHUTTER |
| | INSTALLATION PLAN IS ALSO REQUIRED; WHO WILL DO THE |
| | INSTALLATION, WHERE THE IMPACT PROTECTION WILL BE |
| | STORED IF REMOVABLE IMPACT PROTECTION IS PROPOSED, HOW |
| | IT WILL BE INSTALLED ON A FOUR STORY BUILDING. |
| | |
| | WHEN A FIRE RATED WINDOW IS REQUIRED, RATED GLASS BLOCK |
| | IS OFTEN USED AS THERE IS NO IMPACT REQUIREMENT IN |
| | NON-HVHZ. |
| | |
| | |
