Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 16111261
Permit Number 16111261
Review Stop FIRE
Sequence Number 1
Notes
Date Text
2016-12-14 16:02:51THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE
 MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
  
  
 1)SHEET A1.1A - CANOPY'S ARE NOTED ON THE EXTERIOR OF
 THE STAIRWELL EXITS. THOSE CANOPYS ARE TO BE FIRE
 RETARDENT MATERIAL AND UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT WITH THE
 CANOPY STRUCTURE WITH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE INDICATING ACKNOWLEDGEMENT WITH
 THE ABOVE.
  
  
 2) SHEET A2.0 - UNDER THE "C" DRAWING A HORIZONTAL
 SLIDER WINDOW IS INDICATED WITH THE STAIRWELL WALL. THE
 WALL IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A RATING. ANY OPENING IN THE
 RATING WALL SHALL CONTAIN THE SAME RATING REQUIRMENT.
  
 7.2.2.5 ENCLOSURE AND PROTECTION OF STAIRS.
 7.2.2.5.1 ENCLOSURES.
 7.2.2.5.1.1 ALL INSIDE STAIRS SERVING AS AN EXIT OR
 EXIT COMPONENT SHALL BE ENCLOSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 7.1.3.2.
  
 7.1.3.2 EXITS.
 7.1.3.2.1 WHERE THIS CODE REQUIRES AN EXIT TO BE
 SEPARATED FROM OTHER PARTS OF THE BUILDING, THE
 SEPARATING CONSTRUCTION SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 SECTION 8.2 AND THE FOLLOWING:
 (1)* THE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING WHERE THE EXIT CONNECTS THREE OR
 FEWER STORIES.
 (2) THE SEPARATION SPECIFIED IN 7.1.3.2.1(1), OTHER
 THAN AN EXISTING SEPARATION, SHALL BE SUPPORTED BY
 CONSTRUCTION HAVING NOT LESS THAN A 1-HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING.
 (3)* THE SEPARATION SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 2-HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING WHERE THE EXIT CONNECTS FOUR OR MORE
 STORIES, UNLESS ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS EXISTS:
 (A) IN EXISTING NON-HIGH-RISE BUILDINGS, EXISTING EXIT
 STAIR ENCLOSURES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE
 RESISTANCE RATING.
 (B) IN EXISTING BUILDINGS PROTECTED THROUGHOUT BY AN
 APPROVED, SUPERVISED AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.7, EXISTING EXIT STAIR
 ENCLOSURES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 1-HOUR FIRE RESISTANCE
 RATING.
 (C) THE MINIMUM 1-HOUR ENCLOSURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 28.2.2.1.2, 29.2.2.1.2, 30.2.2.1.2, AND 31.2.2.1.2
 SHALL BE PERMITTED AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE REQUIREMENT
 OF 7.1.3.2.1(3).
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE RATING OF THE SLIDER WINDOW.
  
  
 3) SHEET G0.1 - THERE IS NO INDICATIONS OF ANY EXISTING
 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND/OR THAT ANY SPRINKLER WORK
 SHALL BE DONE UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWING BY A
 QUALIFIED LIFE SAFETY CONTRACTOR.
  
 2014 FL BLDG CODE
  
 105.3.1.2
 NO PERMIT MAY BE ISSUED FOR ANY BUILDING CONSTRUCTION,
 ERECTION, ALTERATION, MODIFICATION, REPAIR, OR ADDITION
 UNLESS THE APPLICANT FOR SUCH PERMIT PROVIDES TO THE
 ENFORCING AGENCY WHICH ISSUES THE PERMIT ANY OF THE
 FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS WHICH APPLY TO THE CONSTRUCTION FOR
 WHICH THE PERMIT IS TO BE ISSUED AND WHICH SHALL BE
 PREPARED BY OR UNDER THE DIRECTION OF AN ENGINEER
 REGISTERED UNDER CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES:
  
 2. FIRE SPRINKLER DOCUMENTS FOR ANY NEW BUILDING OR
 ADDITION WHICH INCLUDES A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM WHICH
 CONTAINS 50 OR MORE SPRINKLER HEADS. PERSONNEL AS
 AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 633 FLORIDA STATUTES, MAY DESIGN
 A FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM OF 49 OR FEWER HEADS AND MAY
 DESIGN THE ALTERATION OF AN EXISTING FIRE SPRINKLER
 SYSTEM IF THE ALTERATION CONSISTS OF THE RELOCATION,
 ADDITION OR DELETION OF NOT MORE THAN 49 HEADS,
 NOTWITHSTANDING THE SIZE OF THE EXISTING FIRE SPRINKLER
 SYSTEM.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE THE APPLICABLE INFORMATION/DOCUMENTATION
 INDICATING COMPLAINCE WITH THE ABOVE NOTED INFORMATION.
  
  
  
 4) WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE PLAN SHEET
 REVISION CLOUDS OR NUMBERED NARRATIVE RESPONSES TO THE
 ABOVE.
  
  
  
 5) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE
 RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved