| Date |
Text |
| 2017-02-01 18:49:38 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) ADDITION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | OLD SETS WERE VOIDED. SHEETS 03 AND E-1 WERE REVISED |
| | BUT THEY WERE NOT REPLACED BY THE OLD ONES. ONE OF THE |
| | VOIDED SETS DON'T HAVE THE ARCHITECT'S SEAL AND |
| | SIGNATURE. PLEASE PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE SETS SIGNED AND |
| | SEALED FOR PROPER PROCESSING. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1- BRING PLANS TO PALM BEACH COUNTY (2300 N. JOG RD.) |
| | FOR IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT. BRING BACK COUNTY STAMPED |
| | PLANS AND COPY OF PAID RECEIPT IF FEES ARE DUE. COUNTY |
| | IMPACT FEE ORDINANCE OF THE UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT |
| | CODE. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | 2- REVISE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | A) OWNER OR LEGALLY DESIGNATED AGENT NEED TO CERTIFY AT |
| | THE BOTTOM OF THE FORM AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R103.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). NOTE: |
| | PERMIT CAN NOT BE ISSUED WITHOUT THE OWNER'S |
| | CERTIFICATION. |
| | |
| | B) ITEM #1 IS INCORRECT. THIS IS NOT NEW CONSTRUCTION. |
| | THE CALCULATIONS ARE DONE FOR THE ENTIRE HOUSE., THIS |
| | IS AN EXISTING CONSTRUCTION PLUS THE ADDITION. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | C) ITEM # 6 IS INCORRECT. ACCORDING TO PLANS (SHEET 01) |
| | THE EXISTING LIVING AREA IS 1945 S.F. AND THE LIVING |
| | ROOM EXTENSION IS 351 S.F. THEREFORE, THE TOTAL AREA IS |
| | 2296 S.F. NOT 1967 S.F.. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | D) ITEM #8 IS INCORRECT. ACCORDING TO PLANS THERE IS NO |
| | CRAWLSPACE. REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | E) PROVIDE THE NAME (NOT JUST THE SIGNATURE) OF THE |
| | PERSON WHO PREPARED THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R405.4.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | F) ROOF MATERIAL SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 OF 4 IS INCORRECT. |
| | THERE ARE NOT SHINGLES ON THIS HOUSE. SEE PLANS AND |
| | REVISE AS REQUIRED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | LABEL FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR AND |
| | SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS WILL |
| | BE REQUIRED, WHEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT USING THE |
| | DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | A) SLIDING GLASS WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | B) WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | C) SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTOR H10S AS SPECIFIED ON |
| | PLANS. NOTE: FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL "F25" SPECIFIED |
| | ON SHEET 03 IS NOT A VALID FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | NUMBER. REVISE AS REQUIRED. ALSO, FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS LISTED ON SHEET D-1 ARE NO CURRENT. UPDATE TO |
| | THE CURRENT 2014 CODE. |
| | NOTE: JAX APEX TECHNOLOGY COVER PAGE OF REPORT NO |
| | SIM201501 SUBMITTED IS NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT APPROVAL |
| | AND IT DOESN'T LIST SPECIFIED CONNECTORS. PROVIDE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL (OR MIAMI-DADE) COVER PAGE AND |
| | PAGE SHOWING THE SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD TO LIST EACH FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER |
| | NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | 4- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | ABOVE PRODUCT APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED: |
| | A) ENGINEER TO PROVIDE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE (NOT COPY) AS |
| | REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTE. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SUBMITTED SAME |
| | SHEETS AGAIN. |
| | |
| | B) COVER PAGE IS MISSING THE INFORMATION OF THE DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD. FAC SEC. 61G15-31.003. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SUBMITTED SAME |
| | SHEETS AGAIN. |
| | |
| | C) NEED THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE TRUSS ENGINEER ON EACH |
| | DRAWING AS REQUIRED BY FAC SEC. 61G15-31.003. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SUBMITTED SAME |
| | SHEETS AGAIN. |
| | |
| | D) DESIGN PROFESSIONAL OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE |
| | ALL TRUSS DRAWINGS AS REQUIRED BY FAC SEC. |
| | 61G15-31.003. |
| | RESPONSE: REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. SUBMITTED SAME |
| | SHEETS AGAIN. |
| | |
| | 6- NEW COMMENT: CLARIFY WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF |
| | SUBMITTING LETTER FOR "EQUIVALENCE OF PUBLISHED |
| | VERSIONS OF ASTM D1761 AND ASTM D7147."? |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.. |
| | ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMITT OLD |
| | DRAWINGS FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
