| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-23 18:09:46 | RESIDENTIAL (?) ALTERATION, SECOND BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CHECKLIST FOR MAIN BUILDING. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | DESIGN PROFESSIONAL MAY BE CHARGED FOUR TIMES THE PLAN |
| | REVIEW FEES AS REQUIRED BY FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B) |
| | FOR FUTURE SUBMITTALS WHEN THEY ARE DENIED 3 OR MORE |
| | TIMES. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- PROPOSED USE OF THESE BUILDINGS IS NOT CLEAR. |
| | PROPOSED SITE PLAN SHOWS TWO EXISTING BUILDINGS WITH |
| | PARKING FOR 5 CARS, INCLUDING PARKING FOR A HANDICAPPED |
| | PERSON. THIS PARKING LAYOUT IS TYPICAL FOR COMMERCIAL |
| | USE. FLOOR PLANS SUBMITTED SHOW A LAYOUT FOR A SINGLE |
| | FAMILY RESIDENCE. CLEARLY IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED USED OF |
| | EACH BUILDING. NOTE: THE EXISTING USE IS A SINGLE |
| | FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH A DETACHED GARAGE. IDENTIFY THE |
| | USE OF EACH BUILDING FOR PROPER PLAN REVIEW. SEC. 102.2 |
| | CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. CLEARLY IDENTIFY TYPE OF RESIDENTIAL |
| | USE. SEE SEC. 310 FBC -BUILDING, 5TH EDITION AND REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. THE PROPOSED USE OF THE MAIN BUILDING IS |
| | NOT CLEAR. IS IT A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE OR BUSINESS. |
| | ACCORDING TO ZONING, COMMERCIAL USE IS NOT ALLOWED. |
| | NEED ZONING APPROVAL FOR PROPOSED USE. BUILDING REVIEW |
| | CAN NOT BE PERFORMED IF SPECIFIC USE IS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | REVISE INFORMATION IN SHEET 2 OF 9. COORDINATE WITH |
| | ZONING. IF BUSINESS IS ALLOWED, THEN CLEARLY SPECIFY |
| | TYPE OF BUSINESS FOR PROPER BUILDING REVIEW. NOTE: |
| | PARKING LAYOUT AND ACCESSIBILITY DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS ARE NO REVIEWED BECAUSE THEY DON'T APPLY |
| | TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES. THESE WILL BE REVIEWED FOR |
| | COMPLIANCE IF ZONING APPROVES A COMMERCIAL USE FOR HIS |
| | PROPERTY AND THE PLANS ARE CLEAR ON THE PROPOSED USE. |
| | ALSO, IF THERE IS A CHANGE OF USE FROM RESIDENTIAL TO |
| | COMMERCIAL, THEN ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY IMPACT FEES ASSESSMENT WILL BE REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 2- ACCORDING TO THE WEBSITE STREET VIEW OF THIS HOUSE, |
| | THE WINDOWS AND DOORS LOOK NEW OR FAIRLY NEW. THERE ARE |
| | NO CITY RECORDS FOR PERMITS TO REPLACE THE WINDOWS. |
| | THIS SCOPE OF WORK NEEDS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PLANS |
| | AND PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTED. SPECIFY THE TYPE AND |
| | SIZE OF ORIGINAL WINDOWS AND TYPE AND SIZE OF PROPOSED |
| | WINDOWS. NOTE: SHEET 5 OF 7 SPECIFIES THAT 24SH ARE |
| | BEDROOM EGRESS WINDOWS. TYPICALLY 24SH SINGLE HUNG |
| | WINDOWS DON'T COMPLY WITH THE HEIGHT EGRESS |
| | REQUIREMENTS. PROVIDE MANUFACTURER'S SPECS SHOWING THE |
| | CLEAR OPENING DIMENSIONS OF THE 24SH WINDOWS TO VERIFY |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH THE EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. SEC. 704 |
| | FBC-EXISTING BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SIZE OF PROPOSED WINDOWS IS NOT CLEAR. FLOOR PLAN ON |
| | SHEET 5 OF 9 SPECIFIES NEW (2)25 SH WINDOWS, WHILE |
| | FLOOR PLAN ON SHEET 6 OF 9 SPECIFIES (2)24 SH WINDOWS |
| | EGRESS. ALSO, SCOPE OF WORK FOR BEDROOM #1 AND BEDROOM |
| | #2 ON SHEET 6 OF 9 SPECIFIES (2) 25 WINDOWS. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED TO MATCH. NOTE: TYPICALLY 24SH WINDOWS DON'T |
| | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIRED EGRESS HEIGHT. |
| | |
| | 3- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.001 FOR: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) EXTERIOR DOORS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) SINGLE HUNG WINDOWS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | C) FIXED WINDOW SIZE AS SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | D) WINDOW MULLIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. AND, CLEARLY |
| | IDENTIFY MULLION SIZE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | E) SHUTTERS, IF DOOR AND WINDOWS DON'T HAVE IMPACT |
| | GLAZING. AND PROVIDE COMPLETE INSTALLATION SCHEDULE. |
| | SEE CITY SAMPLE. |
| | NOTE: IF WINDOWS DON'T HAVE IMPACT GLAZING, THEN SAFETY |
| | GLASS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR WINDOWS LOCATED IN HAZARDOUS |
| | LOCATIONS. SEC. R308.4 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 4- ENGINEER OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION IS TOO |
| | LOW BASED ON ALL THE SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON PLANS. |
| | VALUATION TO INCLUDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S |
| | OVERHEAD AND PROFIT AND ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. REVISE |
| | VALUATION. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. THE VALUE OF $15,000 DECLARED IN THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM IS TOO LOW BASED ON ALL THE SCOPE OF |
| | WORK SHOWN ON PLANS AND THE FEES FOR TWO DESIGN |
| | PROFESSIONALS (ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER). REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 6- SHEET 3 OF 9 (2 OF 7 ON FIRST SUBMITTAL): |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A) CLEARLY SPECIFY THE OCCUPANCY USE/TYPE SPECIFIED ON |
| | THE WIND INFORMATION ON THE UPPER RIGHT SIDE OF SHEET 2 |
| | OF 7. CLEARLY DEFINE WHAT TYPE OF "RESIDENTIAL |
| | DWELLING" IS THE PROPOSED USE OF THIS BUILDING. IS THIS |
| | R3 RESIDENTIAL?. SEE SEC. 310 FBC-BUILDING, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. THIS ITEM NEEDS TO BE COORDINATED WITH |
| | ITEM #1 ABOVE. THE CORRECT USE AND OCCUPANCY NEEDS TO |
| | BE CLEARLY SPECIFIED FOR PROPER BUILDING REVIEW. REVISE |
| | AS REQUIRED. COORDINATE WITH ZONING ALSO. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | B) SPECIFY THE INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENT ON THE |
| | WIND INFORMATION. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | C) IF THIS IS A CHANGE OF USE FROM RESIDENTIAL (R3) TO |
| | COMMERCIAL, THEN THIS IS NOT LEVEL OF ALTERATION 2. |
| | THIS WILL BE CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY. SEC. 506 FBC-EXISTING |
| | BUILDING, 5TH EDITION (2014). REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | COORDINATE WITH ITEM #1 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | D) REVISE THE WINDOWS DESIGN PRESSURES TABLE SHOWN ON |
| | THE UPPER RIGHT CORNER. NEED TO SPECIFY THE DESIGN |
| | PRESSURES FOR THE EFFECTIVE WIND AREA OF EACH WINDOW AS |
| | REQUIRED BY TABLE R301.2(2) FBC-RESIDENTIAL. PROVIDE |
| | THE DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH WINDOW EVEN WHEN THE |
| | WINDOWS ARE MULLED TOGETHER. USE THE LOWEST EFFECTIVE |
| | AREA OF 10 S.F. AS SHOWN ON TABLE R301.2(2) FOR |
| | INDIVIDUAL WINDOWS THAT ARE 10 S.F. OR LESS (OR PROVIDE |
| | THE ACTUAL CALCULATIONS). ALSO, THE LAST WINDOW ON THE |
| | RIGHT HAND SIDE OF THE WEST ELEVATION AND THE NORTH |
| | ELEVATION ARE LOCATED IN THE END ZONE NOT INTERIOR |
| | ZONE. REVISE. AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 7- SHEET 6 OF 9: |
| | A) FLOOR PLAN CALL FOR DETAIL/SECTION 1/5. WHERE IS |
| | THIS DETAIL?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | B) FLOOR PLAN CALL FOR DETAIL/SECTION 2/5. WHERE IS |
| | THIS DETAIL?. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | C) FLOOR PLAN CALL FOR DETAIL/SECTION 3/5. WHERE IS |
| | THIS DETAIL. SEC. 107.2.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS.. |
| | ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | BUILDING DIVISION |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
