| Date |
Text |
| 2016-11-17 14:51:41 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1. THIS APPEARS TO BE A CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY (FROM B TO |
| | I2). REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION. SEE FBC |
| | EB CHAPTER 10. (SHEET LS1.1 STATES THIS IS A CHANGE OF |
| | USE. ) |
| | |
| | 2. LS1.1 INCLUDES A STATEMENT THAT BUILDING IS TO BE |
| | FULLY SPRINKLERED, SEE FIRE SPRINKLER DRAWINGS UNDER |
| | SEPARATE SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | IS THE BUILDING CURRENTLY SPRINKLERED? NOTES ON THE |
| | PLAN APPEAR TO INDICATE THAT SPRINKLERS ARE PROPOSED. |
| | IT APPEARS THAT THIS IS A LEVEL 3 ALTERATION, AND FIRE |
| | SPRINKLERS APPEAR TO BE REQUIRED FBC 5TH EDITION |
| | EXISTING BUILDING 804.2.4. |
| | |
| | IF SPRINKLERS ARE PROPOSED, PROVIDE FIRE SPRINKLER |
| | DESIGN DOCUMENTS AS REQUIRED BY FBC 107.3.5 (5). IS THE |
| | EXISTING WATER SERVICE ADEQUATE FOR A NEW SPRINKLER |
| | SYSTEM, OR WILL A NEW UNDERGROUND LINE BE REQUIRED? |
| | |
| | 3. ENERGY CALC INPUT DATA LACKS DOORS, PLAN SHOWS A |
| | STEEL DOOR, PLEASE CORRELATE FBC 107. |
| | |
| | 4. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, |
| | INCLUDING A COST BREAKDOWN, FBC 109. |
| | |
| | 5. SEE ROOF REVIEW. THE INFORMATION REQUIRED TO OBTAIN |
| | A ROOF SUB PERMIT MAY BE DEFERRED UPON REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 6. SHEET A2.1 SPECS R19, 3.5 INCH INSULATION FOR THE |
| | ROOF. THE ENERGY CALCS SPEC 6 INCH INSULATION, R20. |
| | PLEASE CORRELATE. |
| | |
| | 7. SHEET S4 SHOWS EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN, LIGHTWEIGHT |
| | CONCRETE. THE ENERGY CALCS DO NOT INCLUDE TWO DIFFERENT |
| | ROOF ASSEMBLIES, CLARIFY. THE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED |
| | WITH PROVISO THAT THE EXISTING ROOF IS NOT INCLUDED IN |
| | THE SCOPE OF THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 8. THE FOLLOWING PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE SUBMITTED AND |
| | FOUND ACCEPTABLE: |
| | JOHNS MANVILLE BUILT UP ROOF OVER CONCRETE DECK |
| | PGT SS 3500 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM |
| | PGT SE 3550 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ENTRANCE DOOR |
| | |
| | THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO: PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS FOR COMPONENTS AND CLADDING WHICH ARE |
| | REQUIRED BUT NOT SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO PERMIT |
| | ISSUANCE (FOR INSTANCE, THE BILCO ROOF HATCH, THE STEEL |
| | EXTERIOR DOOR) ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED AND |
| | REVIEWED AS A REVISION PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. |
| | |
| | 9. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, SEPARATE |
| | PERMITS REQUIRED FOR SIGNS, MONUMENT SIGNS, DUMPSTER |
| | ENCLOSURE, FENCING, SITE LIGHTING, |
| | |
| | 10. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, SITE |
| | LIGHTING IS REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH FBC 1006 (MEANS OF |
| | EGRESS ILLUMINATION). |
| | |
| | 11. FBC 1004.1.2, CLARIFY OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE |
| | RESIDENTIAL AREA. THE OCCUPANT LOAD IS LESS THAN THE |
| | NUMBER OF BEDS SHOWN, AND SP1 STATES THERE ARE 46 BEDS. |
| | IT APPEARS THAT DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD IS HIGHER THAN THE |
| | TABLE, CLARIFY OR REVISE. |
| | |
| | 12. A1.1 NOTE 4 STATES THAT KITCHEN DESIGN AND |
| | EQUIPMENT ARE ATTACHED, UNABLE TO LOCATE INFORMATION. |
| | WHO WILL USE THE KITCHEN, RESIDENTS OR STAFF? IS THIS A |
| | WORK AREA, OR AN AMENITY? SEE ALSO FBC B 904.2.1, FBC |
| | ACCESSIBILITY. IT APPEARS THAT THIS WILL SERVE AS A |
| | COMMERCIAL KITCHEN (STAFF ONLY); REVISE PLAN TO |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 13. A7.3, DETAIL 5 IS FOR A SMOKE BARRIER, CLARIFY. |
| | OTHER SHEETS REFER TO A SMOKE PARTION WHICH IS REQUIRED |
| | BY FBC 407.3. IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO EXCEED CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE BUT, IF IT IS CALLED A SMOKE BARRIER, THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF A SMOKE BARRIER ARE APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | 14. DOOR SCHEDULE, A7.1, REVISE TO INCLUDE REQUIREMENTS |
| | FOR DOORS, FBC 407.3.1. |
| | |
| | 15. A6.1, OR OTHER APPLICABLE SHEET, REVISE PLAN TO |
| | INCLUDE REQUIREMENT THAT THE CEILING IS TO BE INSTALLED |
| | IN A MANNER TO LIMIT THE TRANSFER OF SMOKE, FBC 7F10.4. |
| | |
| | 16. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH PROVISO, A SEPARATE |
| | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE GENERATOR REFERENCED ON |
| | E4.0. |
| | |
| | 17. A NOTE ON SHEET LS1.1 STATES THAT THE FIRE ALARM IS |
| | EXISTING AND FULLY FUNCTIONAL. A FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IN |
| | ACCORDANCE WITH FBC B 907.2.6 IS REQUIRED. SINCE THE |
| | ENTIRE SPACE IS BEING RECONFIGURED, IT APPEARS THAT AN |
| | ALTERATION OF THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED. |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH OTHER REQUIREMENTS, SUCH AS OCCUPANT |
| | NOTIFICATION SYSTEM, IS NOT CLEAR AS THIS WAS NOT |
| | REQUIRED FOR THE BUSINESS OCCUPANCY. ARE OCCUPANT |
| | NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS THE SAME FOR BUSINESS AS |
| | SLEEPING AREAS? REVISE PLAN TO NOTE BASIC DESIGN |
| | REQUIREMENTS. A SEPARATE PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | FIRE ALARM AND A COMPLETE REVIEW WILL BE DONE AT THAT |
| | TIME. |
| | |
| | 18. A8.1, DETAILS 2, 5 GRAB BAR IS TOO HIGH, SEE FBC A |
| | 609.9, TOP CANNOT EXCEED 36 IN. |
| | |
| | 19. PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE SHOWERS, FBC A 608. |
| | |
| | 20. A8.1, THE BOTTOM OF THE REFLECTIVE SURFACE IS TO BE |
| | 40IN ABOVE THE FINISHED FLOOR, FBC A 603.3. |
| | |
| | 19. PROVIDE A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT, FBC 1803.2. |
| | STRUCTURAL ENGINEER IS TO REVIEW THE REPORT PRIOR TO |
| | RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 20. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SURVEY FOR THIS PROPERTY, FBC |
| | 107. THE SURVEY SHOULD INCLUDE ALL GRADE LEVEL |
| | MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 21. THIS PARCEL IS LOCATED IN A SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD |
| | AREA (120229 0015B, FLOOD ZONE A8, BFE 16'). REVISE THE |
| | PLAN TO SHOW THE EXISTING FLOOR ELEVATION, PROPOSED |
| | FLOOR ELEVATION, AND ELEVATION OF ALL PROPOSED |
| | EQUIPMENT. THE MINIMUM DFE REQUIRED (BFE 16' + 1' |
| | FREEBOARD CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE 94-541 |
| | THROUGH 94-547). SEE ALSO NFIP REVIEW. |
| | |
| | 22. INFORMATION REGARDING THE TOTAL VALUE OF THE |
| | PROJECT IS REQUIRED AT THIS TIME. IF IT IS AGREED THAT |
| | ITEMS SUCH AS FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM MAY BE |
| | SUBMITTED LATER, THE VALUE OF SUCH ITEMS IS REQUIRED AT |
| | THIS TIME SO THAT A SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT |
| | DETERMINATION CAN BE MADE, FBC 1612. |
| | |
| | 23. A COMPLETE REVIEW CANNOT BE DONE AT THIS TIME UNTIL |
| | THE INFORMATION REGARDING VALUE AND EXISTING BUILDING |
| | ELEVATION IS PROVIDED. PLEASE PROVIDE THIS INFORMATION |
| | VIA EMAIL. IF AN ELEVATION CERTIFICATE IS AVAILABLE, |
| | SEND VIA EMAIL. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
