| Date |
Text |
| 2018-02-05 08:55:19 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | REVISED 2/21/18 |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | 1. SEE COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS LISTS, ITEM #16: REVISE |
| | PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 705, TABLES 602, |
| | 705.8. |
| | |
| | 3RD REVIEW, SHEET A004 WAS PRELIMINARILY REVIEWED AND |
| | AGREED UPON IN A MEETING - A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT IS TO |
| | BE FILED TO LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ON THE ADJACENT LOT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE TIMELINE FOR THE RECORDING OF THE |
| | RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND THE REPLAT. SEE ALSO NEW |
| | COMMENT #2. |
| | |
| | 2. A004 DOES NOT MATCH A005 AND OTHER SHEETS. SHEET |
| | A005 AND OTHER PAGES (SUCH AS A201) DEPICT THE CORNER |
| | OF THE ROOF OVERHANG EXTENDING OVER THE ADJACENT |
| | PROPERTY. ALTHOUGH A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT ADDRESSING |
| | THE PROPOSED NONCOMPLIANT CONDITION AT THIS LOCATION, I |
| | DO NOT RECALL EXTENSION OVER THE PROPERTY LINE. AS THE |
| | TWO PLANS CONFLICT, CLARIFY WHAT IS PROPOSED. |
| | |
| | 2/21/18 PER BUILDING OFFICIAL, OK FOR OVERHANG TO |
| | ENCROACH PROPERTY LINE INTO THE AREA COVERED BY THE |
| | RESTRICTIVE COVENANT. |
| | |
| | 3. SOME OF THE STRUCTURAL PAGES HAVE A DIGITAL |
| | SIGNATURE WHICH DO NOT COMPLY WITH FAC61G15-23 (STATES |
| | THE DOCUMENT WAS SIGNED BY "DOCUSIGN" RATHER THAN |
| | C.TIEDGE,PE. THIS HAS BEEN DISCUSSED WITH ENGINEER AND |
| | SENT TO FBPE TO ANSWER HER QUESTIONS. FOR THE STRUCTURE |
| | PERMIT, ENGINEER HAD ADDRESSED THE ISSUE BY UTILIZING A |
| | DIGITAL SEAL FROM A DIFFERENT VENDOR. |
| | |
| | SHEETS WHICH NEED A NEW DIGITAL SIGNATURE (SIGNED BY |
| | "DOCUSIGN" RATHER THAN ENGINEER): S001, S002, S003, |
| | S200, S302, S303, S304, S305 |
| | |
| | S201, S300 (MESSAGE: SIGNED AND ALL SIGNATURES ARE |
| | VALID, BUT WITH UNSIGNED CHANGES AFTER THE LAST |
| | SIGNATURE), |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 4. HOLLOWCORE SHOP DRAWINGS ARE NOT SIGNED AND SEALED |
| | AND ARE NOT REVIEWED BY SEOR, FAC61G15-30.005. THIS WAS |
| | ALSO NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE STRUCTURE PERMIT. WHAT IS |
| | THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION DATE? ALL DELEGATED |
| | ENGINEERING IS TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED, AND APPROVED |
| | PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. THIS MAY BE A PROVISO ITEM UPON |
| | REQUEST, REQUIRED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, IF THERE IS |
| | ADEQUATE TIME TO DO SO (ALLOW AT LEAST 30 DAYS AFTER |
| | PERMIT ISSUANCE BEFORE SETTING OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT |
| | FOR SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW OF REQUIRED DOCUMENTS). |
| | |
| | 5. MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ANCHOR INFORMATION WAS |
| | PROVIDED. THIS WAS NOT REVIEWED BY DOR, AND DOES NOT |
| | INDICATE THE METHOD OF FASTENING PROPOSED, FBC B 1609, |
| | FBC 107. AS A STRUCTURE PERMIT HAS ALREADY BEEN ISSUED, |
| | PROVIDE PROPOSED INSTALLATION DATE. THIS MAY BE A |
| | PROVISO ITEM UPON REQUEST, REQUIRED PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION, IF THERE IS ADEQUATE TIME TO DO SO (ALLOW |
| | AT LEAST 30 DAYS AFTER PERMIT ISSUANCE BEFORE SETTING |
| | OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW OF |
| | REQUIRED DOCUMENTS). |
| | |
| | 6. A202, A203, BLUE DOTS WERE ADDED TO THE PLAN. THIS |
| | APPEARS TO BE RELATED TO PLUMBING. CLARIFY WHY THIS |
| | INFORMATION WAS ADED TO THE PLAN FOR THIS REVIEW; THIS |
| | INFORMATION IS NOT TYPICALLY SHOWN ON THIS PAGE. EITHER |
| | REMOVE OR PROVIDE A LEGEND. ADDITIONAL REVIEW BY |
| | PLUMBING MAY BE REQUIRED, FBC 107. CHECK ALL PAGES. |
| | |
| | 7. NA |
| | |
| | 8. THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING |
| | PROVISOS: |
| | |
| | A. PRODUCT APPROVALS WERE NOT SUBMMITTED. ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTALM, FBC B 1609. |
| | |
| | B. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE ROOF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL INDICATING THE ASSEMBLY PROPOSED AND |
| | ENGINEERING, IF APPLICABLE, IS TO BE SUBMITTED. THE |
| | ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL IS TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED PRIOR |
| | TO ROOF WORK COMMENCEMENT. |
| | |
| | C. MOVEABLE (NONFIXED) SEATING WAS NOT REVIEWED. |
| | |
| | D. REPLAT REQUIRED PRIOR TO CO. A COPY OF THE RECORDED |
| | REPLAT IS TO BE PROVIDED VIA EMAIL. |
| | |
| | E. RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REQUIRED PRIOR TO C.O. A COPY |
| | OF THE RECORDED DOCUMENT IS TO BE PROVIDED VIA EMAIL. |
| | |
| | F. SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED; ONLY BUILDING, |
| | MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING ARE INCLUDED IN THIS |
| | REVIEW. SEPARATE PERMITS, FEES AND PLANS ARE REQUIRED |
| | FOR FIRE ALARM, FIRE SPRINKLER, FIRE UNDERGROUND LINE, |
| | PARKING LOT, GAS, LOW VOLTAGE, LANDSCAPING, AND OTHER |
| | SUCH ITEMS. |
| | |
| | G. THIS PROJECT HAS A SEPARATE ENGINEERING PERMIT; |
| | THERE MAY BE CONFLICTS BETWEEN THESE CIVIL SHEETS AND |
| | THE ISSUED ENGINEERING PERMIT. ISSUED AT CONTRACTOR'S |
| | RISK. APPLICANT IS TO REVISE ANY SHIEETS WHICH AFFECT |
| | BUILDING OR FIRE CODE COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
