| Date |
Text |
| 2017-06-30 07:15:43 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | FBC = FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, 5TH EDITION (2014) |
| | FBC B = FBC BUILDING |
| | FBC EB = FBC EXISTING BUILDING |
| | FBC A = FBC ACCESSIBILITY |
| | FBC EC = FBC ENERGY CONSERVATION |
| | |
| | STRUCTURE PERMIT IS TO BE ISSUED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF |
| | THIS PERMIT. IF STRUCTURE PERMIT IS NOT ISSUED, VALUE |
| | IS TO BE ADJUSTED. |
| | |
| | 1-15. OK |
| | |
| | 16. FROM PREVIOUS LIST: REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE |
| | WITH FBC B 705, TABLES 602, 705.8. DISTANCE TO ASSUMED |
| | PROPERTY LINE OR PROPERTY LINE NOT CLEAR, COMPLIANCE |
| | NOT CLEAR. PROVIDE A SITE PLAN, OR REVISE THE SITE |
| | PLAN, TO INCLUDE THE PROPERTY LINES, ASSUMED PROPERTY |
| | LINES, AND DIMENSIONS OF THIS BUILDING TO THE PROPERTY |
| | LINES, DIMENSION OF ADJACENT BUILDING (OR FUTURE |
| | ADJACENT BUILDING) TO THE ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE OR |
| | PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, A004, A SITE PLAN SHOWING POD LINES WAS |
| | PROVIDED. THE EAST DISTANCE TO PROPERTY LINE IS SHOWN |
| | AS 14'2 1/8", BUT THIS IS SHOWN TO A POINT WHICH IS NOT |
| | WORST CASE. THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING |
| | APPEARS TO TOUCH THE PROPERTY LINE ON AN ANGLE. THE |
| | OVERHAND APPEARS TO EXTEND OVER THE POD BOUNDARY LINE. |
| | THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING APPEARS TO SHOW A |
| | TRELLIS WHICH EXTENS TO "PBA #4 BOUNDARY LINE". |
| | |
| | REVISE AND SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC B 705, TABLES 602, |
| | 705.8, 705.2 (PROJECTIONS). |
| | |
| | REVISE PLAN TO CLARIFY, WHAT IS "POD BOUNDARY LINE"? IS |
| | THIS PROPERTY UNDERGOING A REPLAT? IS THIS THE PROPOSED |
| | PROPERTY LINE? IF THIS IS NOT THE PROPOSED NEW PROPERTY |
| | LINE (AFTER REPLAT), REVISE PLAN TO SHOW PROPOSED NEW |
| | PROPERTY LINES (AFTER REPLAT). |
| | |
| | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ME TO DISCUSS RESOLUTIONS TO BE |
| | APPROVED PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | 17-27. OK |
| | |
| | 28. FBC A 226, 902, DINING SURFACES, REVISE PLAN TO |
| | SHOW COMPLIANCE. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, BANYAN GRILL DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE AN |
| | ACCESSIBLE SECTION. PLEASE EXPLAIN RATIONALE. |
| | |
| | 29-49. OK |
| | |
| | THIS PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED WITH THE FOLLOWING PROVISOS: |
| | |
| | A. PRODUCT APPROVALS NOT SUBMMITTED. ALL PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED PRIOR TO |
| | INSTALLATION. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. |
| | |
| | B. A SEPARATE ROOF PERMIT IS REQUIRED. THE ROOF PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL INDICATING THE ASSEMBLY PROPOSED AND |
| | ENGINEERING, IF APPLICABLE, IS TO BE SUBMITTED. THE |
| | ROOF PRODUCT APPROVAL IS TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF |
| | RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL. ROOF PERMIT REQUIRED PRIOR |
| | TO ROOF WORK COMMENCEMENT. |
| | |
| | C.PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE HORIZONTAL 1 HOUR ASSEMBLY, |
| | EITHER TESTED ASSEMBLY OR CALCULATED, FBC B 703.2. |
| | REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE DAMPERS REQUIRED, OR REVISE PLAN |
| | TO INCLUDE EXCEPTION. |
| | |
| | |
