| Date |
Text |
| 2016-12-02 19:07:22 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) FBC-R315.1 CARBON MONOXIDE PROTECTION. EVERY |
| | SEPARATE BUILDING OR AN ADDITION TO AN EXISTING |
| | BUILDING FOR WHICH A PERMIT FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION IS |
| | ISSUED AND HAVING A FOSSIL-FUEL-BURNING HEATER OR |
| | APPLIANCE, A FIREPLACE, AN ATTACHED GARAGE, OR OTHER |
| | FEATURE, FIXTURE, OR ELEMENT THAT EMITS CARBON MONOXIDE |
| | AS A BYPRODUCT OF COMBUSTION SHALL HAVE AN OPERATIONAL |
| | CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM INSTALLED WITHIN 10 FEET OF EACH |
| | ROOM USED FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES. |
| | |
| | 2) THE PLANS HAVE SEVERAL REFERENCES TO THE 2010 FBC. |
| | THE FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) WENT INTO EFFECT ON JUNE |
| | 30, 2015. ALL NEW PERMITS APPLIED FOR ON OR AFTER THAT |
| | DATE ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH AND REFERENCE THE FBC |
| | FIFTH EDITION. FOR EXAMPLE THE GENERAL NOTE ON SHEET |
| | S-4. |
| | |
| | 3) THE FOOTING NOTES ON S-3 FOR WALL SECTION 2 ARE NOT |
| | CONSITENT WITH THE FOUNDATION SCHEDULE ON S-1. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. FBC-R404.1.6 HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. |
| | CONCRETE AND MASONRY FOUNDATION WALLS SHALL EXTEND |
| | ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE ADJACENT TO THE FOUNDATION AT |
| | ALL POINTS A MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES (102 MM) WHERE MASONRY |
| | VENEER IS USED AND A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES (152 MM) |
| | ELSEWHERE. FOOTINGS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE REQUIRED TO |
| | BE 12 INCHES BELOW GRADE PER FBC R403.1.4. |
| | |
| | 4) FBC R301.2.1 WIND DESIGN CRITERIA. SPECIFY THE |
| | EXPOSURE CATEGORY AND THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING |
| | PRESSURES ON THE PLANS. |
| | |
| | 5) THE KITCHEN WINDOW IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SOUTH |
| | ELEVATION ON SHEET A-2 OR ON SHEETS S-1, S-2, M-1, E-1 |
| | OR WP-1. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 6) THE WINDOW AND DOOR ID TAG LETTERS AND NUMBERS ON |
| | THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT MATCH THE SCHEDULES ON SHEETS A-1 |
| | AND A-2. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 7) THE WOOD BEAM FOR THE FRONT PORCH IS SPECIFIED AS |
| | (3) 2 X 8S ON S-2 AND (2) 2 X 8S ON S-3. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 8) THE ROOF FASTENING SPECIFIED ON S-2 IS NOT |
| | CONSISTENT WITH THE NOTE ON WALL SECTION 2 ON S-3. FBC |
| | 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 9) ON SHEET S-2 THE LINTEL ID TAGS PC 1, PC 2, ETC. DO |
| | NOT HAVE A CORRESPONDING LINTEL SCHEDULE. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 10) SOME OF THE OPENINGS ARE MISSING THE LINTEL ID |
| | TAGS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 11) THE DOOR SCHEDULE SPECIFIES THE EXTERIOR DOORS AS |
| | WOOD AND THE PRODUCT APPROVALS THAT WERE SUBMITTED ARE |
| | FOR METAL DOORS. DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | |
| | 12) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF |
| | THE ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES AND THE SLIDING GLASS DOORS. |
| | |
| | 13) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
