| Date |
Text |
| 2016-12-06 19:03:11 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) ON SHEETS A-3 AND A-4 THERE ARE ID TAGS FOR ROOF TO |
| | WALL CONNECTORS MARKED 1/A4 AND 2/A4, HOWEVER, THERE |
| | ARE NO CORRESPONDING DETAILS FOR THEM ON SHEET A-4. |
| | PLEASE CLARIFY. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 2) THE ENERGY FORM 405 IS NOT COMPLETE AND IS NOT |
| | ACCURATE. THE ADDRESS OR OTHER IDENTIFICATION OF THE |
| | RESIDENCE IS MISSING. THE OWNER'S NAME AND BUILDER'S |
| | NAMES ARE MISSING. THE NAME OF THE PREPARER IS NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. FBC ENERGY R101.5.1.1.2 AND R103.2 |
| | |
| | 3) THE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS FOR THE RESIDENCE IS |
| | SPECIFIED AS 4 (MAIN) AND 8 (BEDROOMS) FOR A TOTAL OF |
| | 12 ON THE ENERGY FORM 405. IN THE EQUIPMENT SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS THE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS ARE SPECIFIED AS 6 |
| | (MAIN) AND 8 (BEDROOMS) FOR A TOTAL OF 14. EXPLAIN HOW |
| | YOU ARE DETERMINING THE NUMBER OF OCCUPANTS AND WHY |
| | THEY ARE DIFFERENT OF FORM 405 AND THE SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) THIS PERMIT IS FOR A SPECIFIC RESIDENCE THAT WILL BE |
| | BUILT ON A SPECIFIED LOT. IT IS NOT THE MASTER FOR A |
| | MODEL THAT WILL BE BUILT ON DIFFERENT LOTS WITH |
| | MULTIPLE ORIENTATIONS. THEREFORE, THE ENERGY |
| | CALCULATIONS ARE SITE SPECIFIC AND ARE NOT WORST CASE. |
| | USE THE ACTUAL DIRECTIONAL ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING |
| | IN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS AND EQUIPMENT SIZING |
| | CALCULATIONS. THERE SHOULD NOT BE ANY ROTATE ANGLE. FBC |
| | ENERGY R403.6.1 AND R405.4.2 |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
