| Date |
Text |
| 2018-05-11 14:17:24 | 3RD REVIEW FBC-2014 MECHANICAL |
| | PERMIT #16100030 |
| | 5/11/18 |
| | |
| | PLAN REVIEW RESULTS: DENIED. |
| | |
| | 1) AS PREVIOUSLY NOTED, ALL OF THE SMOKE CONTROL FANS |
| | MUST BE EQUIPPED WITH A MINIMUM OF TWO BELTS PER |
| | SECTION 909.10.5. FBC-10, AND THE SMOKE CONTROL |
| | RATIONAL ANALYSIS FOR THE PROJECT BY JOSEPH E. HAUF P.E |
| | (SEE FANS- PAGE 21). THE LETTER FROM TOM BARROW COMPANY |
| | TO KAST CONSTRUCTION THAT WAS SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING |
| | DEPARTMENT STATES THAT ALL OF THE SMOKE CONTROL FANS |
| | |
| | ARE UL LISTED AND LABELED FOR SMOKE CONTROL, HOWEVER |
| | THIS IS NOT THE ISSUE IN DISPUTE. THE ISSUE IS THE |
| | LETTER ALSO STATES THAT THE SMOKE CONTROL FANS GEF-1-1, |
| | GEF-1-2, SEF-1-1, LPF-1-1, SPF-1-1, SPF-R-1, AND |
| | SPF-R-2 ARE EQUIPPED WITH 1 BELT ONLY, AND THEREFORE |
| | ARE NON-COMPLIANT. DUE TO THE FACT THAT THIS IS THE 3RD |
| | REVIEW OF THE PROJECT, THE ISSUE WAS REFERRED TO ROBERT |
| | BROWN |
| | |
| | BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR WPB. HIS JUDGEMENT IS THAT THE |
| | TWO-BELT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT WILLL BE ENFORCED. AS A |
| | RESULT THESE COMMENTS HAVE BEEN WRITTEN, AND A PHONE |
| | CALL WAS PLACED TO TWR ENGINEERS TO ALERT THEM. |
| | |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, IT IS HELPFUL TO PROVIDE A RESPONSE |
| | LETTER ADDRESSING EACH ITEM ALONG WITH THE CITY |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL FORM. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE INSERT |
| | CORRECTED PLAN SHEETS INTO THE SETS, REMOVE THE |
| | PREVIOUSLY REVIEWED SHEETS AND MARK VOID ON THEM, AND |
| | KEEP THEM WITH THE SUBMITTALS. |
| | |
| | CHRISTOPHER L. COLE |
| | MECHANICAL PLANS EXAMINER |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET |
| | WEST PALM BEACH FL 33401 |
| | 561-805-6719 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
