| Date |
Text |
| 2016-10-28 18:15:29 | PLAN |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS |
| | |
| | 1ST REVIEW: FBC FIFTH EDITION (2014) |
| | ROBERT MCDOUGAL, CBO |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | (561) 805-6714 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | DENIED BY BUILDING |
| | PLEASE ADDRESS THE ITEMS NOTED BELOW: |
| | |
| | 1) THE PROPERTY IS CLOSE TO THE LINE THAT DIVIDES THE |
| | A5 FLOOD ZONE AND THE C FLOOD ZONE BASED ON THE FIRM |
| | FOR THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, COMMUNITY NUMBER |
| | 120229, PANEL NUMBER 0020 B, EFFECTIVE DATE MARCH 1, |
| | 1979. THE BORDER LINE OF A5 FLOOD ZONE WHICH IS A |
| | SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA (SFHA) DOES NOT TOUCH THE |
| | EXISTING STRUCTURE OR THE PROPOSED ADDITION. THEREFORE, |
| | THE STRUCTURE IS NOT LOCATED IN A SFHA AND AN ELEVATION |
| | CERTIFICATE IS NOT REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2) THE VALUE FOR THE WORK SPECIFIED ON THE APPLICATION |
| | OF $39,050.00 IS LOW AND HAS BEEN ADJUSTED TO |
| | $107,259.00 BASED ON THE LATEST ICC VALUATION DATA. FBC |
| | 109.3 BUILDING PERMIT VALUATION. FOR PERMITTING |
| | PURPOSES, VALUATION OF BUILDINGS AND SYSTEMS SHALL BE |
| | TOTAL REPLACEMENT VALUE TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL, |
| | ELECTRIC, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, INTERIOR FINISH, |
| | RELATIVE SITE WORK, ARCHITECTURAL AND DESIGN FEES, |
| | MARKETING COSTS, OVERHEAD AND PROFIT; EXCLUDING ONLY |
| | LAND VALUE. VALUATION REFERENCES MAY INCLUDE THE LATEST |
| | PUBLISHED DATA OF NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION COST ANALYSIS |
| | SERVICES (MARSHALL-SWIFT, MEANS, ETC.), AS PUBLISHED BY |
| | INTERNATIONAL CODE CONGRESS. FINAL BUILDING PERMIT |
| | VALUATION SHALL BE SET BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL. |
| | |
| | 3) EXPOSURE CATEGORY D IS SPECIFIED ON SHEET 02 AND |
| | EXPOSURE C IS SPECIFIED ON SHEETS D-1 AND T-1. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. FBC 107.2.1 |
| | |
| | 4) THE DESIGN PRESSURES THAT ARE SPECIFIED ON THE FRONT |
| | ELEVATION ON SHEET 02 FOR THE DOOR FROM THE CARPORT TO |
| | THE RESIDENCE ARE TOO LOW FOR EXPOSURE D. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. FBC-R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 5) SHOW HOW THE ADDITION WILL COMPLY WITH FBC-R807.1 |
| | ATTIC ACCESS. BUILDINGS WITH COMBUSTIBLE CEILING OR |
| | ROOF CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE AN ATTIC ACCESS OPENING TO |
| | ATTIC AREAS THAT EXCEED 30 SQUARE FEET (2.8 M2) AND |
| | HAVE A VERTICAL HEIGHT OF 30 INCHES (762 MM) OR |
| | GREATER. THE VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE |
| | TOP OF THE CEILING FRAMING MEMBERS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF |
| | THE ROOF FRAMING MEMBERS. |
| | THE ROUGH-FRAMED OPENING SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 22 |
| | INCHES BY 30 INCHES (559 MM BY 762 MM) AND SHALL BE |
| | LOCATED IN A HALLWAY OR OTHER READILY ACCESSIBLE |
| | LOCATION. WHEN LOCATED IN A WALL, THE OPENING SHALL BE |
| | A MINIMUM OF 22 INCHES WIDE BY 30 INCHES HIGH. WHEN THE |
| | ACCESS IS LOCATED IN A CEILING, MINIMUM UNOBSTRUCTED |
| | HEADROOM IN THE ATTIC SPACE SHALL BE |
| | AT SOME POINT 30 INCHES (762 MM ABOVE THE ACCESS |
| | MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE BOTTOM OF CEILING FRAMING |
| | MEMBERS. SEE SECTION M1305.1.3 FOR ACCESS REQUIREMENTS |
| | WHERE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED IN ATTICS. |
| | |
| | 6) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO SETS OF PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | FOR THOSE PRODUCTS WHICH ARE REGULATED BY DCA RULE 9N-3 |
| | THAT HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE |
| | DESIGNER OF RECORD. |
| | |
| | 7) FBC 107.3.4 - PROVIDE TWO COMPLETE PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | WITH FL OR NOA NUMBERS INCLUDING INSTALLATION |
| | INSTRUCTIONS AND MAXIMUM DESIGN PRESSURES FOR EACH OF |
| | THE DIFFERENT ROOFING MATERIALS (SLOPED AND FLAT) AND |
| | STRUCTURAL WINDOW MULLIONS. |
| | |
| | 8) FBC 107.2.1.2 FOR ROOF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED BY THE |
| | CODE, THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS SHALL ILLUSTRATE, |
| | DESCRIBE AND DELINEATE THE TYPE OF ROOFING SYSTEM, |
| | MATERIALS, FASTENING REQUIREMENTS, FLASHING |
| | REQUIREMENTS AND WIND RESISTANCE RATING THAT ARE |
| | REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED. PRODUCT EVALUATION AND |
| | INSTALLATION SHALL INDICATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE WIND |
| | CRITERIA REQUIRED FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE OR A STATEMENT |
| | BY AN ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER FOR THE SPECIFIC SITE MUST |
| | BE SUBMITTED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. |
| | |
| | 9) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT WAS SUBMITTED FOR THE |
| | SLIDING GLASS DOOR IS NOT RATED FOR LARGE MISSILE |
| | IMPACT WHICH IS REQUIRED BY FBC-R301.2.1.2. PLEASE |
| | CLARIFY. |
| | |
| | 10) THE COMPONENT AND CLADDING PRESSURES LISTED ON THE |
| | THE FRONT ELEVATION FOR THE DOOR FROM THE CARPORT TO |
| | THE RESIDENCE ARE TO LOW FOR EXPOSURE D. FBC 301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 11) THE MAXIMUM DESIGN NEGATIVE DESIGN PRESSURE FOR THE |
| | OUTSWING STEEL DOOR ( -47.8 PSF ) DOES NOT MEET THE |
| | REQUIRED PRESSURES FOR EXPOSURE "D" IN A 170MPH VULT |
| | WINDSPEED WITH A 15 FOOT MEAN ROOF HEIGHT. FBC R301.2.1 |
| | |
| | 12) THE PRODUCT APPROVAL DRAWINGS THAT WERE SUBMITTED |
| | ARE TOO SMALL TO READ CLEARLY. THEY SHOULD BE PRINTED |
| | IN LANDSCAPE FORMAT SO THAT THE DRAWING COVERS THE |
| | ENTIRE 8-1/2" X 11" PAPER. FBC 107.2.1.4 |
| | |
| | 13) IN ORDER TO REDUCE PLAN REVIEW TIME, PLEASE SUBMIT |
| | A RESPONSE LETTER INDICATING HOW EACH OF THE REVIEW |
| | COMMENTS HAS BEEN ADDRESSED. |
