| Date |
Text |
| 2016-09-30 16:12:10 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET C 8 - THE PROPOSED INDICATED FDC CONFIGURATION |
| | IS NOT COMPLIANT. THE FDC SHAL NOT BE IN A POSITION TO |
| | PROVIDE PRESSURE TO THE FIRE LINE SUPPLY SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | |
| | PER NFPA 13 |
| | |
| | 8.17.2.4* ARRANGEMENT. SEE FIGURE 8.17.2.1. |
| | 8.17.2.4.1* THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE ON |
| | THESYSTEM SIDE OF THE WATER SUPPLY CHECK VALVE. |
| | |
| | 8.17.2.4.2 FOR SINGLE SYSTEMS, THE FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| | CONNECTION SHALL BE INSTALLED AS FOLLOWS: |
| | (1) WET SYSTEM?ON THE SYSTEM SIDE OF SYSTEM CONTROL, |
| | CHECK, AND ALARM VALVES (SEE FIGURE A.8.16.1.1) |
| | |
| | |
| | A.8.17.2.4 THE CHECK VALVE SHOULD BE LOCATED TO |
| | MAXIMIZE ACCESSIBILITY AND MINIMIZE FREEZING POTENTIAL. |
| | IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CHECK VALVE BE LOCATED TO |
| | REDUCE THE LENGTH OF NONPRESSURIZED PIPE IN THE FIRE |
| | DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SUPPLY LINE. |
| | A.8.17.2.4.1 THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHOULD BE |
| | CONNECTED TO THE SYSTEM RISER. FOR SINGLE SYSTEMS, IT |
| | IS AN ACCEPTABLE ARRANGEMENT TO ATTACH THE FIRE |
| | DEPARTMENT CONNECTION TO ANY POINT IN THE SYSTEM, |
| | PROVIDED THE PIPE SIZE MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | 8.17.2.3. |
| | |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET C 8 - THE LOCATION OF THE FDC AND HYDRANT IS |
| | RECOMENDED TO BE PLACED CLOSER TO THE BUILDING, OR THE |
| | FDC ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING, CLOSER TO THE AREA OF FD |
| | ACCESS. THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY STATED DURING PPRC |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET LS 100 - THERE ARE INCORRECT REFERENCES AND |
| | EDITIONS TO THE FIRE CODES. |
| | |
| | THE PROPOSED PROJECT SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE |
| | 5TH EDITION OF FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE INCLUDING |
| | THE 2012 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101 AND ALL OTHER |
| | APPLICABLE CODES OR STANDARDS. |
| | FIRE SPRINKLER WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF NFPA 13, 2010 EDITION. |
| | FIRE ALARM WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | NFPA 72, 2010 EDITION. |
| | CONSTRUCTION WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF |
| | NFPA 241, 2009 EDITION. |
| | FIRE EXTINGUISHERS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS |
| | OF NFPA 10, 2010 EDITION. |
| | ELECTRIC WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, 2011 EDITION. |
| | CLEAN AGENT SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 2001, 2012 |
| | EDITION. |
| | EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH |
| | NFPA 110, 2013 EDITION. |
| | |
| | |
| | 4) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
