| Date |
Text |
| 2016-10-28 17:41:33 | ****CORRECTIONS**** |
| | |
| | SAMANTHA HILL |
| | BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER |
| | [email protected] |
| | 561-805-6724 |
| | |
| | 1. A4.3, DETAIL 2, GRAB BAR TO BE MEASURED TO THE TOP |
| | OF THE BAR, FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY 609.4. |
| | |
| | COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED, SAME SHEET SUBMITTED. RESPONSE |
| | LETTER STATES THAT THE DETAIL WAS REVISED, BUT NO |
| | REVISION WERE MADE TO THIS SHEET. |
| | |
| | 2. A4.3, PLANS REFER TO OUTDATED CODE SECTIONS (FOR |
| | INSTANCE, 11.4.22.2). UPDATE ALL REFERENCES. PLAN |
| | REFERS TO ADAAG; FLORIDA BUILDING CODE IS APPLICABLE. |
| | |
| | COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED, SAME SHEET SUBMITTED. RESPONSE |
| | LETTER STATES SHEET A4.3 WAS REMOVED FROM PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. THE SAME SHEET IS IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 3. A4.3, SEE FBC 5TH EDITION ACCESSIBILITY 604.4, SEAT |
| | HEIGHT OF WATER CLOSET IS TO BE 17 IN MINIMUM AND 19 |
| | INCHES MAXIMUM. DETAIL 2 SHOWS THE MEASUREMENT TO THE |
| | TOP OF THE LID. REVISE AND CHECK ALL |
| | GRAPHICS/DIMENSIONS. |
| | |
| | COMMENT NOT ADDRESSED, SAME SHEET SUBMITTED. RESPONSE |
| | LETTER STATES SHEET A4.3 WAS REMOVED FROM PERMIT |
| | APPLICATION. THE SAME SHEET IS IN THE PLAN. |
| | |
| | 4. FUNCTION OF THE LIVE KITCHEN IS NOT CLEAR. THE FLOOR |
| | PLAN DOES NOT SHOW SEATS WHICH ARE SHOWN ON A5.3. |
| | ACCESSIBILE SEATING IS NOT SHOWN. PROVIDE MORE |
| | INFORMATION FBC 107. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE LETTER STATES THIS IS A FUNCTIONAL KITCHEN. |
| | ACCESSIBLE SEATING NOT SHOWN. FUNCTION OF SPACE IS |
| | STILL NOT ENTIRELY CLEAR (SALES DEMO, CLASSES, PARTY?), |
| | SO IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE A CODE REFERENCE. |
| | HOWEVER, ACCESSIBLE SEATING IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5. A1.0, "OFFICE GROUP M MERCANTILE WHAREHOUSE" |
| | (S.I.C.); REVISE TO WHAT APPEARS TO BE CORRECT |
| | CLASSIFICATION, MERCANTILE. OFFICE IS BUSINESS, |
| | WAREHOUSE IS S1 OR S2. |
| | |
| | 2ND REVIEW, THIS HAS NOW BEEN CHANGED TO "MAJOR |
| | MERCANTILE." PLEASE EXPLAIN, THIS CLASSIFICATION IS NOT |
| | IN THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. REVISE, SEE FBC CHAPTER |
| | 3. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE HAVE ARCHITECT EXPLAIN INCONSISTENCY IN |
| | ARCHITECT'S SIGNATURE BETWEEN 9/16 AND 10/14, ORIGINAL |
| | SHEETS AND REVISED SHEETS A1.0 AND A4.2. |
| | |
| | WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE SUBMIT A COMPLETE SET (A |
| | SHEETS) IN ADDITION TO THE SHEETS WHICH WILL BE REVISED |
| | AS A SET IS BEING RETAINED. |
| | |
| | 7. SEE FLORIDA STATUTE 553.80(2)(B): |
| | |
| | WITH RESPECT TO EVALUATION OF DESIGN PROFESSIONALS' |
| | DOCUMENTS, IF A LOCAL GOVERNMENT FINDS IT NECESSARY, IN |
| | ORDER TO ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | CODE AND ISSUE A PERMIT, TO REJECT DESIGN DOCUMENTS |
| | REQUIRED BY THE CODE THREE OR MORE TIMES FOR FAILURE TO |
| | CORRECT A CODE VIOLATION SPECIFICALLY AND CONTINUOUSLY |
| | NOTED IN EACH REJECTION, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, |
| | EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION, STRUCTURAL STABILITY, ENERGY, |
| | ACCESSIBILITY, LIGHTING, VENTILATION, ELECTRICAL, |
| | MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND GAS SYSTEMS, OR OTHER |
| | REQUIREMENTS IDENTIFIED BY RULE OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING |
| | COMMISSION ADOPTED PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 120, THE LOCAL |
| | GOVERNMENT SHALL IMPOSE, EACH TIME AFTER THE THIRD SUCH |
| | REVIEW THE PLANS ARE REJECTED FOR THAT CODE VIOLATION, |
| | A FEE OF FOUR TIMES THE AMOUNT OF THE PROPORTION OF THE |
| | PERMIT FEE ATTRIBUTED TO PLANS REVIEW. |
| | |
| | NOTE THAT THE STATUTE STATES "SHALL IMPOSE," NOT "MAY |
| | IMPOSE." |
| | |
| | DUE TO THE MANNER IN WHICH THE COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED, |
| | PLEASE HAVE ARCHITECT PROVIDE A RESPONSE LETTER (RATHER |
| | THAN THE "PROJECT MANAGER"). PLEASE HAVE ARCHITECT |
| | CONTACT ME IF HE OBJECTS TO THIS REQUEST. |
| | |
| | 8. THE TITLE BLOCK IS TO INCLUDE THE ARCHITECT BUSINESS |
| | NUMBER, FS481, FAC61G1. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
