Plan Review Notes
Plan Review Notes For Permit 16090638
Permit Number 16090638
Review Stop B
Sequence Number 2
Notes
Date Text
2016-12-09 11:46:12****CORRECTIONS****
  
 SAMANTHA HILL
 BUILDING PLANS EXAMINER
 [email protected]
 561-805-6724
  
 FBC 5TH EDITION, BUILDING
  
 PLEASE SEE PREVIOUS PLAN REVIEW. THE RESPONSE LETTER
 ADDRESSES ONLY THE FIRST TWO, THEN THE NFIP REVIEW.
 THEREFORE, AS IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW THESE ITEMS WERE
 ADDRESSED, OR IF THEY WERE ADDRESSED, SOME OF THE SAME
 COMMENTS REMAIN:
  
 1-4. OK
  
 5. SEE IMPACT FEE REVIEW. IMPACT FEE ASSESSMENT BY PALM
 BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO PERMIT ISSUANCE.
 PLEASE CONTACT THEM DIRECTLY TO COORDINATE.
  
 6. OK
  
 7. ALS1.1, PLAN STATES THAT THIS IS BUILDING TYPE VB
 AND IIB. BUILDING AREA HAS NOT BEEN REVIEWED AS IT IS
 NOT CLEAR WHICH ONE APPLIES TO THIS PROJECT, FBC 503.1,
 FBC EXISTING BUILDING 1012.5.
  
 8. ALS1.1, LIFE SAFETY PLAN, COMPLIANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF FBC CHAPTER 10 NOT CLEAR.
  
 FOR INSTANCE, LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS PROVIDES AN
 OVERALL SQUARE FOOT AREA WITH ONE OCCUPANT LOAD FOR THE
 MERCANTILE AREA, BUT ALL OF THE MERCANTILE OCCUPANTS
 ARE DISTRIBUTED THROUGHOUT DIFFERENT AREAS AND DO NOT
 USE THE SAME EXITS AS THEY ARE IN DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF
 THE BUILDING.
  
 FOR INSTANCE, THREE DIFFERENT AREAS UTILIZE ONE MEANS
 OF EGRESS COMPONENT (RAMP) BUT IT IS NOT CLEAR HOW MANY
 OCCUPANTS WILL USE THIS COMPONENT.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:
  
 SQUARE FOOT AREA OF EACH SPACE
 MEANS OF EGRESS WIDTH FOR EACH COMPONENT
  
 9. PROVIDE AN OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION, OCCUPANT LOAD,
 SQUARE FOOT AREA FOR THE FRONT PATIO, ENTRY DECK, REAR
 PATIO, FBC 1004.
  
 10. FBC 303.4, A3 OCCUPANCY INCLUDES GYMNASIUMS, PLAN
 PROPOSES BUSINESS FOR THE SPIN AREAS. EXPLAIN RATIONALE
 OR REVISE PLAN. IF PLAN IS NOT REVISED TO A3, PLEASE
 EMAIL RATIONALE PRIOR TO RESUBMITTING.
  
 11. PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING THE USE OF THE FRONT
 PATIO AREA FOR SEATING, VENDING, AND EXIT DISCHARGE. IT
 IS NOT CLEAR HOW MANY OCCUPANTS WILL BE SEATED IN THIS
 AREA, HOW MANY OCCUPANTS WILL BE FORCED TO TRAVEL
 THROUGH THIS AREA AS A REQUIRED EXIT DISCHARGE. HOW
 WILL THE REQUIRED EXIT PATH BE KEPT CLEAR? NO SEATING
 PLAN WAS SHOWN, BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THIS AREA
 WILL BE USED FOR DINING AND EVENTS. FBC 107.
  
 12. AN OCCUPANT LOAD OF 30 SF PER PERSON FOR MERCANTILE
 DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A REASONABLE OCCUPANT LOAD
  
 13. FBC 303.1.2, IT APPEARS THAT THE FOOD AND DRINK
 VENDORS SHOULD BE CLASSIFIED AS BUSINESS OCCUPANCY OR
 A2 RATHER THAN MERCANTILE. REVISE OR PROVIDE
 CLARIFICATION.
  
 14. CLARIFY DESIGN INTENT REGARDING HARDWARE FOR EXIT
 DOORS A1.1.1. HARDWARE SET 1 IS SPECIFIED FOR THE EXIT
 DOORS AND INCLUDE A PUSH BAR. IS THE "PUSH BAR" A PANIC
 DEVICE OR FIRE EXIT HARDWARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 FBC1008.1.10?
  
 IT APPEARS THAT THE FOOD AND DRINK VENDING AREAS WITH
 THEIR SHARED SEATING AREA (REAR PATIO) WILL HAVE AN
 OCCUPANT LOAD WHICH EXCEEDS 50, SO PANIC BARS WOULD BE
 REQUIRED, FBC 1008.1.10 (IF ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY). IT
 APPEARS THAT THIS IS DESIGNER?S INTENT. REVISE PLAN TO
 SPECIFY PANIC BARS FOR HARDWARE SET 1 OR CONTACT ME TO
 DISCUSS.
  
 NOTE THAT 30 SF PER PERSON FOR MERCANTILE IS FOR USES
 OF MERCANTILE TYPE SPACES; STORES WITH DISPLAYS AND ONE
 OR TWO CHECK OUT AREAS. THE SPACE PROPOSED INCLUDES
 ONLY THE CONCENTRATED CHECK OUT AREA TYPE OF SPACE, SO
 30 SF PER PERSON DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A NUMBER
 CONSISTENT WITH THE USE.
  
 NOTE ALSO THAT, WITH PANIC DEVICES, SPACE COMPLIES WITH
 A2 OCCUPANCY FOR FBC BUILDING.
  
 15. FBC 107, MINIMUM 1/8 INCH SCALE REQUIRED, ALS1.1,
 A1.1.1.
  
 16. SHOW THE EXIT DISCHARGE FROM THE REAR STAIRS TO THE
 PUBLIC WAY, FBC 1027.
  
 17. E6 DOES NOT SHOW AN EXIT SIGN AT THE REAR EXIT, FBC
 1011.1.
  
 18. ALS1.1, BUILDING DIAGONAL TO SHOW THAT TWO REQUIRED
 EXITS ARE REMOTELY LOCATED SHOULD MEASURE SPACE WHICH
 IS SERVED BY THE TWO EXITS. THE DIAGONAL INCLUDES A
 LARGE SPACE WHICH HAS A SEPARATE EXIT. THE DIMENSION
 BETWEEN THE TWO EXITS SHOULD MEASURE THE TWO EXITS
 WHICH SERVE THE SPACE REQUIRING TWO EXITS, FBC
 1015.2.1. THE DIMENSION SHOWN MEASURES TWO EXITS
 SERVING TWO DIFFERENT PORTIONS OF THE BUILDING.
  
 19. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH FBC 1006, MEANS
 OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION, REAR EXIT AND, IF APPLICABLE,
 THE SECOND EXIT FOR ROOM 134. E6.0, PHM1, DO NOT SHOW
 ANY LIGHTING FOR THE REAR EXIT AND EXIT DISCHARGE TO
 THE PUBLIC WAY.
  
 20. REQUIRED FIRE RATED WALLS ARE NOT SHOWN. AT LEAST
 TWO SIDES OF THE BUILDING LIKELY HAVE FIRE RATING
 REQUIREMENTS AS THEY SIT IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE
 PROPERTY LINE. REVISE PLAN TO SHOW ALL FIRE RATED
 WALLS, FBC TABLE 705.8, FBC EXISTING BUILDING 1012.6.
  
 21. FBC ACCESSIBILITY 207.1, REVISE PLAN TO INDICATE
 WHICH METHOD OF COMPLIANCE IS ELECTED.
  
 22. THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED IS FOR 1401 CLARE AVENUE,
 BUT THE PARCEL ID AND SITE ARE CONSISTENT WITH 1301
 CLARE AVENUE PER PROPERTY APPRAISER. REVISE PLAN AND
 APPLICATION OR CLARIFY. IF APPLICANT WOULD LIKE THE
 ADDRESS CHANGED TO 1401 CLARE AVENUE, PLEASE ADVISE. AT
 THIS TIME IT APPEARS THAT THE LEGAL ADDRESS FOR THIS
 PARCEL IS 1301 CLARE AVENUE.
  
 23. PRODUCT APPROVALS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY DESIGNER OF
 RECORD PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL, FBC 107. THE PRODUCT
 APPROVALS SUBMITTED WERE REVIEWED BY SOMEONE OTHER THAN
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD. PER BUILDING OFFICIAL, A DESIGN
 PROFESSIONAL OTHER THAN THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD BUT
 FROM THE SAME OFFICE MAY REVIEW ON BEHALF OF THE
 ARCHITECT OF RECORD. THAT LICENSED INDIVIDUAL IS TO
 INCLUDE THEIR FULL NAME AND LICENSE NUMBER ON THE
 REVIEW STAMP.
  
 THE 3100 RESISTOR STOREFRONT IS REFERENCED ON SHEET
 A1.1.1, BUT I WAS UNABLE TO LOCATE A REFERENCE TO THE
 DOOR. EITHER HAVE ARCHITECT SIGN THE SHOP DRAWING
 REVIEW STAMP FOR THE DOOR, OR INCORPORATE A REFERENCE
 IN THE PLAN. FYI, IF ARCHITECT?S REVIEW IS DONE VIA A
 REFERENCE IN THE PLAN, A CHANGE OF PRODUCT WOULD
 REQUIRE A REVISION TO THE PLAN AS WELL AS A NEW PRODUCT
 APPROVAL TO BE SUBMITTED.
  
 24. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE RAMP WHICH SHOWS
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC ACCESSIBILITY 405.7, LANDINGS AT
 THE TOP AND BOTTOM OF THE RAMP.
  
 25. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE RAMP WHICH SHOWS
 COMPLIANCE WITH FBC ACCESSIBILITY 405.6, RAMP RISE NOT
 TO EXCEED 30 INCHES. A SECTION IS SUGGESTED.
  
 26. A2.01, DETAIL A, SHOWS A RAIN LEADER AND HOSE BIBB
 AT THE BOTTOM OF THE RAMP. EITHER REVISE TO A DIFFERENT
 LOCATION OR PROVIDE A DETAIL TO SHOW HOW THIS WILL NOT
 AFFECT THE WALKING SURFACE STABILITY FBC ACCESSIBILITY
 302.1 AND HOW THIS WILL NOT PROTRUDE INTO THE MEANS OF
 EGRESS.
  
 27. A2.02, COUNTERTOP HEIGHT NOT CLEAR. DETAIL A SHOWS
 A DIMENSION OF 2 FT FOR COUNTER BAR TOP, BUT THE NOTE
 SPECS 42 INCHES.
  
 REVISE PLAN TO SHOW SEATING AREAS AND SHOW COMPLIANCE
 WITH FBC ACCESSIBILITY 902.
  
 28. FBC ACCESSIBILITY, REVISE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATION OF
 CHECK OUT AISLES, SALES AND SERVICE COUNTERS, FBC
 ACCESSIBILITY 904.
 . A2.02 DETAIL 5 DEPICTS A WALL WITH WINDOWS AND DOORS,
 CLARIFY LOCATION.
  
 29. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE MEANS OF EGRESS STAIR FROM
 THE FRONT PATIO TO REAR OF BUILDING, FBC 107. S2.0
 APPEARS TO SHOW THIS AS EXISTING, A1.1.1 SPECS STEEL
 STAIRS.
  
 30. WHEN A CONTRACTOR IS ASSIGNED, PROVIDE A COPY OF
 THE CONTRACT FOR THIS JOB, FBC 109. THE VALUE ON THE
 PERMIT APPLICATION IS TO INCLUDE LABOR, MATERIALS,
 OVERHEAD, PROFIT, EVEN IF PROVIDED BY OTHERS.
  
 THIS ITEM SHOULD NOT DELAY RESUBMITTAL (MAY BE DEALT
 WITH AT A LATER DATE, PRIOR TO ISSUANCE).
  
 NEW COMMENT:
  
 ANY COMMENTS MADE BY OTHER TRADES WHICH ARE ALSO
 REQUIRED BY THE FBC B ARE APPLICABLE FOR BUILDING
 REVIEW (ROOF EQUIPMENT GUARDRAIL AND ACCESS, FIRE
 SPRINKLERS, PLUMBING COMMENTS REGARDING ACCESSIBLITY,
 ZONING COMMENT RE LOADING ZONE).
  
 REGARDING THE LOADING ZONE, WHEN ADDRESSING ZONING'S
 COMMENT, PLEASE CLARIFY WHETHER THIS IS A PASSENGER
 LOADING ZONE (AND SUBJECT TO ACCESSIBILITY).


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved