| Date |
Text |
| 2016-11-21 18:38:29 | NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE (R3), SECOND BUILDING |
| | REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | 1- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- SHEET A1: GARAGE DOOR DESIGN PRESSURES SHOWN ON THE |
| | DATA & DESIGN PRESSURE SCHEDULE ARE TOO LOW BASED ON |
| | THE ADJUSTMENT COEFFICIENT (1.36) AND TABLE R301.2(4) |
| | FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE AS REQUIRED OR PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REVISED DESIGN PRESSURES ARE TOO LOW. CLARIFY WHY USING |
| | 1.21 ADJUSTMENT COEFFICIENT IF DESIGN CRITERIA ON SAME |
| | PAGE SPECIFIES 1.36 BASED ON THE BUILDING HEIGHT OF THE |
| | BUILDING. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 2- ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAIL AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE |
| | STUCCO SOFFIT SPECIFIED ON DETAIL 1/S4 SHOWING |
| | COMPLIANCE WITH SEC. R703.1.3 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | EXPANDED 3/8 IN. RIB LATH REQUIRES 1-3/4 IN. MINIMUM |
| | PENETRATION INTO HORIZONTAL WOOD FRAMING MEMBERS AS |
| | REQUIRED BY ASTM C1063 SEC. 7.10.2.3. REVISE AS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3- ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | MAIN HOUSE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | (A) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, INCLUDING |
| | OWNER'S NAME AND JURISDICTION #. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OWNER INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | (B) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | CLEARLY PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE INDIVIDUAL COMPLETING |
| | THE COMPLIANCE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. ONLY THE |
| | SIGNATURE WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | (C) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | CLARIFY WHY THERE ARE 18 OCCUPANTS SPECIFIED ON PAGE 2 |
| | OF 5. TYPICALLY, 18 PEOPLE IS NOT AN USUAL NUMBER OF |
| | PEOPLE FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. WHAT'S THE |
| | PROPOSED USE OF THIS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. PROVIDE |
| | DOCUMENTATION THAT VERIFIES THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE |
| | SPECIFIED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| | 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. THIS NUMBER OF |
| | PEOPLE IS NOT TYPICAL FOR A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. |
| | PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT SUPPORTS WHY THIS HOUSE IS |
| | GOING TO BE OCCUPIED WITH 18 PEOPLE. CLEARLY DEFINE THE |
| | PROPOSED USE OF THIS RESIDENCE. SINCE THIS IS AN |
| | UNUSUAL SITUATION PLANS WITH PROPOSED NUMBER OF PEOPLE |
| | WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR REVIEW |
| | AND APPROVAL. ALSO, INCREASING OR DECREASING THE NUMBER |
| | OF PEOPLE IN A BUILDING MAY AFFECT THE SIZING OF THE |
| | HVAC EQUIPMENT. FACTOR THAT MAY AFFECT THE PROPER |
| | SIZING OF EQUIPMENT IS NOT ALLOWED. SEC. R403.6.1 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | NOTE: |
| | PERSON PREPARING THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS TO COORDINATE |
| | WITH ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO AVOID MORE |
| | CONFLICTS/DELAYS. SEE ITEM #4 BELOW. |
| | |
| | (D) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | INSULATION R-VALUE AND TYPE SHOWN ON THE CEILING |
| | INFORMATION ON PAGE 3 OF 5 DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN ON ITEM #10 OF PAGE 1 AND PLANS SUBMITTED. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | (E) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | DOORS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 5 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | INFORMATION SHOWN ON PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | SUBMITTED. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, |
| | 5TH EDITION (2014). NOTE: DOOR WITH GLAZING NEEDS TO BE |
| | INCLUDED IN THE WINDOWS AREA. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. |
| | |
| | |
| | CABANA ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | |
| | (A) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | PROVIDE COMPLETE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM, INCLUDING |
| | OWNER'S NAME AND JURISDICTION #. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | OWNER INFORMATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | (B) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | CLEARLY PROVIDE THE NAME OF THE INDIVIDUAL COMPLETING |
| | THE COMPLIANCE REPORT AS REQUIRED BY SEC. R405.4.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED AT ALL. ONLY THE |
| | SIGNATURE WAS PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | (C) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | INSULATION R-VALUE AND TYPE SHOWN ON THE CEILING |
| | INFORMATION ON PAGE 2 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH INFORMATION |
| | SHOWN ON ITEM #10 OF PAGE 1 AND ON PLANS SUBMITTED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | (D) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | THERE IS NO KITCHEN IN THE CABANA. REVISE AS REQUIRED. |
| | SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NOTE: LABEL FOR DOORS AND WINDOWS SHOWING THE U-FACTOR |
| | AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | WILL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT |
| | USING THE SOFTWARE DEFAULT FACTOR FOR GLAZING. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT BASED ON THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED: |
| | 4- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO CLARIFY THE USE AND NUMBER OF |
| | PEOPLE FOR WHICH THIS HOUSE IS DESIGNED FOR. ACCORDING |
| | THE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED, THIS HOUSE IS TO |
| | BE OCCUPIED BY 18 PEOPLE. SEE ITEM #3(C) FOR THE MAIN |
| | HOUSE ABOVE. THIS IS NOT A TYPICAL NUMBER OF PEOPLE FOR |
| | A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE. IT IS NOT CLEAR WHAT IS |
| | GOING TO BE THE USE AND OCCUPANCY OF THIS BUILDING. |
| | CLEARLY SPECIFY ON PLANS NUMBER OF PEOPLE AND USE OF |
| | THIS BUILDING FOR PROPER PLAN REVIEW. SINCE THIS IS AN |
| | UNUSUAL SITUATION PLANS WITH PROPOSED NUMBER OF PEOPLE |
| | WILL BE FORWARDED TO THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FOR REVIEW |
| | AND APPROVAL. SEC. 102.2 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 5- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | (A) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | BALCONIES UNDERLAYMENT THAT IS DESIGNED TO RECEIVE TILE |
| | OR MARBLE AS SPECIFIED ON THE FINISH SCHEDULE ON SHEET |
| | A7. NOTE: CLEARLY IDENTIFY ON PRODUCT APPROVAL SPECIFIC |
| | ASSEMBLY TO BE INSTALLED TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE |
| | DESIGN PRESSURES OF SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | SELECTED SYSTEM NO C-36 FROM HYDROSTOP FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL20663 SUBMITTED IS NOT A DESIGNED |
| | UNDERLAYMENT TO RECEIVE TILE/MARBLE. SEE ROOF COVER |
| | NOTES 13 AND 14 AS REQUIRED BY SYSTEM NO C-36. NEED TO |
| | PROVIDE A PRODUCT APPROVAL THAT IS DESIGNED TO RECEIVE |
| | TILE/MARBLE. |
| | |
| | (B) GARAGE DOORS. NOTE: GARAGE DOORS FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL FL 16546.30 SUBMITTED WILL BE REVIEWED WHEN |
| | THE GARAGE DOOR DESIGN PRESSURES ARE CLARIFIED. SEE |
| | ITEM #1 ABOVE. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENTS: |
| | (C) PEEL AND STICK UNDERLAYMENT FOR METAL ROOF AS |
| | SPECIFIED ON PLANS. LEAKBARRIER FAST 90 OF FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL FL 10450-R8 SUBMITTED CAN NOT BE USED |
| | FOR METAL ROOF. SEE TABLE 1 OF FL10450-R8. |
| | |
| | (D) JAMES HARDIE CEMENT SIDING. PROVIDE COMPLETE |
| | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL FOR THE PROPOSED INSTALLATION |
| | (WOOD FRAME AND CONCRETE BLOCK AS SHOWN ON PLANS). |
| | INFORMATION SUBMITTED DOESN'T HAVE A FLORIDA PRODUCT |
| | APPROVAL OR MIAMI-DADE NOA. IF THERE IS NOT A CURRENT |
| | APPROVED PRODUCT APPROVAL, THEN MANUFACTURER MAY APPLY |
| | FOR LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. CONTACT ME FOR MORE |
| | INFORMATION ABOUT LOCAL PRODUCT APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 6- DESIGNER OF RECORD TO APPROVE ABOVE PRODUCT |
| | APPROVALS AS REQUIRED BY SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY |
| | AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | 7- TRUSS PACKAGE SUBMITTED: (NOTE: THERE IS NO NEED TO |
| | RE-SUBMIT THE TRUSS PACKAGE. THE TRUSS PACKAGE MAY BE |
| | DELIVERED (AFTER REQUIRED INFORMATION IS PROVIDED) TO |
| | THE BUILDING INSPECTOR AT TIME OF FRAMING INSPECTION). |
| | |
| | A) ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | EACH OF THE DRAWINGS OF THE TRUSS PACKAGE NEED TO HAVE |
| | THE TITLE BLOCK OF THE TRUSS ENGINEER AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G15-31.003. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | ****PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE TO EXPEDITE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |