| Date |
Text |
| 2016-11-16 08:20:06 | RESIDENTIAL (R3) CHANGE OF USE/ALTERATION SECOND |
| | BUILDING REVIEW CHECKLIST. |
| | CODE: FBC 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 1- PROVIDE ENERGY CALCULATIONS (2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED |
| | BY SEC. R101.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | NOTE: NEED ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR EACH SEPARATE |
| | STRUCTURE. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | ONLY THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE MAIN HOUSE WERE |
| | SUBMITTED. THERE WERE NOT CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED FOR |
| | THE GARAGE THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE CONVERTED TO LIVING |
| | SPACE. NEED TO PROVIDE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE |
| | GARAGE CONVERSION. |
| | NOTE: AFTER LOOKING AT THE HISTORIC REVIEW COMMENTS, IT |
| | LOOKS LIKE THE MAIN HOUSE IS A CONTRIBUTING HISTORIC |
| | BUILDING. ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE NOT REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | MAIN HOUSE. THE GARAGE BUILDING IS NOT A HISTORIC |
| | CONTRIBUTING BUILDING. ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE REQUIRED |
| | FOR THE GARAGE BUILDING. PERMIT CAN NOT BE ISSUED |
| | WITHOUT THE COMPLETE ENERGY CALCULATIONS. SEC. |
| | R103.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION. |
| | |
| | 2- SINCE THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS FOR THE GARAGE |
| | BUILDING WERE NOT SUBMITTED, THEN CONTRACTOR MAY USE |
| | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS DONE FOR THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS |
| | SUBMITTED FOR THE MAIN HOUSE TO MAKE SURE GARAGE |
| | REQUIRED ENERGY CALCULATIONS ARE COMPLETE AND CORRECT. |
| | A) COMPLETE ALL THE INFORMATION ON TOP OF FORM |
| | INCLUDING OWNER NAME, BUILDER NAME, PERMIT OFFICE AND |
| | JURISDICTION NUMBER. SEC. R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | B) REVISE ITEM #1. THIS IS NOT NEW CONSTRUCTION. SEC. |
| | R101.5.1.1.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION |
| | (2014). |
| | |
| | C) ENERGY CALCULATIONS NEED TO BE DONE FOR THE ACTUAL |
| | ORIENTATION OF THE BUILDING. THEY CAN NOT BE DONE FOR |
| | THE WORST CASED SCENARIO. REVISE ITEM #5. SEC. R103.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | D) NEED TO PROVIDE PROOF OF THE WINDOWS AND DOORS |
| | U-FACTOR AND SHGC FACTOR SPECIFIED ON ITEM #7. SEC. |
| | R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | NOTE: THIS IS REQUIRED WHEN THE ENERGY CALCULATIONS USE |
| | FACTORS OTHER THAN THE DEFAULT FACTORS. |
| | |
| | E) NEED TO REVISE THE ROOF TYPE AND MATERIALS SHOWN ON |
| | PAGE 2 OF 4. THIS BUILDING HAS GABLE AND FLAT ROOFS |
| | (NOT HIP). SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | F) DOORS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 4 DOESN'T MATCH |
| | PLANS AND PRODUCT APPROVALS SUBMITTED. SEC. R103.2 |
| | FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | G) THE WINDOWS INFORMATION SHOWN ON PAGE 3 OF 4 DOESN'T |
| | MATCH PLANS. REVISE THE BUILDING ORIENTATION, TOTAL |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE AND OVERHANG DEPTH AND SEPARATION TO |
| | MATCH PLANS. SEC. R103.2 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH |
| | EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | H) BUILDER NEEDS TO COMPLETE THE EPL DISPLAY CARD. SEC. |
| | R405.4.3 FBC-ENERGY CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | I) BUILDER NEEDS TO COMPLETE THE INSPECTION CHECKLIST |
| | (TABLE 402.4.11 SUBMITTED). SEC. R405.4.2 FBC-ENERGY |
| | CONSERVATION, 5TH EDITION (2014). |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 3- VALUATION DECLARED IN THE PERMIT IS TOO LOW BASED ON |
| | THE SCOPE OF WORK SHOWN ON PLANS. VALUATION TO INCLUDE |
| | ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, CONTRACTOR'S OVERHEAD AND PROFIT |
| | AND ALL DESIGN PROFESSIONAL FEES AS REQUIRED BY SEC. |
| | 109.3 CITY AMENDMENTS. REVISE VALUATION AS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | 4- PROVIDE PRODUCT APPROVAL ( 2 COPIES) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | FAC 61G20-3.002(33) FOR: |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | A)ALL SIMPSON STRUCTURAL CONNECTORS SPECIFIED ON |
| | DETAILS SUBMITTED. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. PROVIDE THE FLORIDA |
| | PRODUCT APPROVAL COVER PAGE AND PAGE SHOWING THE |
| | SPECIFIED CONNECTOR OR DESIGN PROFESSIONAL TO LIST THE |
| | FLORIDA PRODUCT APPROVAL NUMBER NEXT TO EACH SPECIFIED |
| | CONNECTOR. |
| | |
| | ORIGINAL COMMENT: |
| | 5- ARCHITECT OF RECORD TO REVIEW AND APPROVE IN WRITING |
| | (NOT SIGNING AND SEALING) ALL PRODUCT APPROVALS |
| | (INCLUDING THE ONES ALREADY SUBMITTED) AS REQUIRED BY |
| | SEC. 107.3.4.1 CITY AMENDMENTS. |
| | |
| | RESPONSE: |
| | REPEAT COMMENT. NOT ADDRESSED. |
| | |
| | NEW COMMENT: |
| | 6- PLANS WERE REVISED. PLANS SHOW WINDOW HEATING AND |
| | COOLING UNIT INSTEAD OF SPLIT A/C UNIT. REMOVABLE |
| | WINDOW UNIT IS NOT ALLOWED TO PROVIDE HEATING AS |
| | REQUIRED BY SEC. R303.9 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. REVISE PLANS |
| | SHOWING THE HEATING AND COOLING UNIT IN A PERMANENT |
| | FRAMED SPACE. REVISE FLOOR PLAN AND EXTERIOR ELEVATION |
| | ACCORDINGLY. AND PROVIDE FRAMING DETAILS AND |
| | SPECIFICATIONS. SEC. R301.1 FBC-RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | ***PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSE LETTER ADDRESSING EACH |
| | COMMENT TO EXPEDITE THE REVIEW PROCESS. |
| | ***PLEASE INSERT ANY REVISED DRAWING AND REMOVE OLD |
| | DRAWING. DON'T STAPLE OLD DRAWINGS. SUBMIT OLD DRAWINGS |
| | FOR REFERENCE. |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT |
| | JULIO GOMEZ |
| | COMMERCIAL COMBINATION PLANS EXAMINER |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | (561)805-6712 |
| | [email protected] |
