| Date |
Text |
| 2016-09-02 09:52:01 | THIS PLAN WAS REVIEWED AND FAILED BY PETER LEDUC, FIRE |
| | MARSHAL, WITH THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1) SHEET LS 1.0 ? THERE IS AN INCORRECT CODE REFERENCE |
| | UNDER THE HEADING OF CODE INFORMATION; PALM BEACH |
| | COUNTY LOCAL FIRE CODE AMENDMENTS IS NOT UNDER THE |
| | JURISDICTION OR ENFORCED BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | FIRE DEPARTMENT. |
| | |
| | 2) SHEET LS 1.1 ? THERE IS AN INDICATION, ES ? |
| | ELECTRONIC DOOR SECURITY RELEASE BUTTON, ON SEVERAL |
| | EXIT DOORS. ANY SECURITY DEVICE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101, CHAPTER 7, MEANS |
| | OF EGRESS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A CONFIRMATION NOTE. |
| | |
| | ANY INSTALLATION OF ELECTRONIC SECURITY DEVICES SHALL |
| | BE SUBMITTED UNDER SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS WITH |
| | APPLICABLE MANUFACTURER?S SPECIFICATION SHEETS AND |
| | FUNCTIONALITY STEPS. |
| | |
| | 3) SHEET A 4.2 ? DOORS # 3 ARE INDICATED AS BEING 20 |
| | MIN FIRE RATING IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A6.2. |
| | SHEET LS 1.1 INDICATES DOORS # 3 AS 45 MIN FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND CORRECT TO THE PROPER FIRE |
| | RATING. |
| | |
| | 4) SHEET A 4.2 ? DOORS # 5 ARE INDICATED AS BEING 20 |
| | MIN FIRE RATING IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A6.2. |
| | SHEET LS 1.1 INDICATES DOORS # 5 AS 45 MIN FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND CORRECT TO THE PROPER FIRE |
| | RATING. |
| | |
| | 5) SHEET A 4.1 ? DOORS # 5 ARE INDICATED AS BEING 20 |
| | MIN FIRE RATING IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A6.2. |
| | SHEET LS 1.1 INDICATES DOORS # 5 AS 45 MIN FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND CORRECT TO THE PROPER FIRE |
| | RATING. |
| | |
| | 6) SHEET A 4.1 ? DOOR # 8 IS INDICATED AS BEING 20 MIN |
| | FIRE RATING ON SHEET LS 1.1. IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON |
| | SHEET A6.2 THERE IS NO INDICATION OF A FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND CORRECT TO THE PROPER FIRE |
| | RATING. |
| | |
| | 7) SHEET A 4.2 ? DOOR # 13 IS INDICATED AS BEING 20 MIN |
| | FIRE RATING IN THE DOOR SCHEDULE ON SHEET A6.2. SHEET |
| | LS 1.1 INDICATES DOORS # 5 AS 45 MIN FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND CORRECT TO THE PROPER FIRE |
| | RATING. |
| | |
| | 8) SHEET A 4.3 ? DOORS # 3 TO THE STORAGE ROOMS ARE |
| | INDICATED AS BEING 20 MIN FIRE RATING IN THE DOOR |
| | SCHEDULE ON SHEET A6.2. SHEET LS 1.1 INDICATES DOORS # |
| | 3 AS 45 MIN FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND CORRECT TO THE PROPER FIRE |
| | RATING FOR A STORAGE ROOM. |
| | |
| | 9) SHEET A 4.1 ? THE NORTH AREA 1 HOUR WALL SEPARATION |
| | INDICATES WALL DESIGN P7C. SHEET A 6.1 INDICATES ONLY A |
| | P7. |
| | |
| | PLEASE CONFIRM THIS WALL DESIGN, POSSIBLE CONFLICT |
| | NOTED BELOW. |
| | |
| | 10) SHEET A 4.3 INDICATES THE CORRIDOR WALLS AS P7. |
| | SHEET A 6.1 INDICATES THE P7 RATING AS GOING ONLY TO A |
| | RATED CEILING. THERE IS NO RATED CEILING CALL OUT |
| | INDICATION IN THE CORRIDOR AREA. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND CORRECT TO AN APPLICABLE |
| | CALL OUT FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | 11) SHEET A 4.2 ? THERE IS SEPARATION WALL IN THE |
| | CENTER AREA THAT IS INDICATED AS P7C. THERE IS NO P7C |
| | INDICATED ON SHEET A 6.1. |
| | |
| | HOWEVER, SHEET LS 1.1 INDICATES THIS CENTER WALL AS A |
| | SOLID LINE 1 HOUR FIRE RATING GOING TO THE BOTTOM SIDE |
| | OF THE ROOF DECK. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND CORRECT TO AN APPLICABLE |
| | CALL OUT FIRE RATING. |
| | |
| | 12) SHEET A 3.1 ? BUILDING SECTION 3 INDICATES A |
| | CEILING FIRE RATING ULP522. THERE IS NO UL DESIGN CALL |
| | OUT DETAIL THAT CAN BE IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN SHEETS. |
| | |
| | ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE NO INDICATIONS OR DESIGN |
| | LIMITATIONS OR BOUNDARIES FOR ANY FIRE RATING CEILING |
| | ASSEMBLY AREAS. |
| | |
| | PLEASE REVIEW, CLARIFY AND PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC AREA |
| | BOUNDARIES OF ANY FIRE RATED CEILING AREAS. |
| | |
| | 13) SHEET H 1.0 ? A HOOD SYSTEM IS INDICATED. ANY HOOD |
| | SYSTEM OR SUPPRESSION SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 96 AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER A |
| | SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | THE HOOD SYSTEM AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEM IS NOT APPROVED |
| | UNDER THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE OF CONFIRMATION WITH THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 14) REPEATED COMMENT - SHEET E 3.0 - A HOOD SYSTEM IS |
| | INDICATED. ANY HOOD SYSTEM OR SUPPRESSION SYSTEM SHALL |
| | COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 96 AND SHALL BE |
| | SUBMITTED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT AND SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | THE HOOD SYSTEM AND SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ARE NOT APPROVED |
| | UNDER THIS PERMIT. |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A NOTE OF CONFIRMATION WITH THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | 15) SHEET E 5.0 ? A GENERATOR IS INDICATED. THE |
| | GENERATOR INSTALLATION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE |
| | REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 110, STANDARD FOR EMERGENCY AND |
| | STANDBY POWER SYSTEMS. |
| | |
| | THE GENERATOR INSTALLATION IS NOT APPROVED UNDER THIS |
| | PERMIT. |
| | THE GENERATOR INSTALLATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED UNDER |
| | SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS. |
| | |
| | 16) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE PROVIDED ON THE |
| | RE-SUBMITTAL OF THE ABOVE. |
| | |
| | PETER LEDUC |
| | FIRE MARSHAL |
| | 561-804-4709 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
